个人中心
文章发布
退出
作者热门文章
- ubuntu12.04环境下使用kvm ioctl接口实现最简单的虚拟机
- Ubuntu 通过无线网络安装Ubuntu Server启动系统后连接无线网络的方法
- 在Ubuntu上搭建网桥的方法
- ubuntu 虚拟机上网方式及相关配置详解
24
4
CFSDN坚持开源创造价值，我们致力于搭建一个资源共享平台，让每一个IT人在这里找到属于你的精彩世界.
这篇CFSDN的博客文章java 中volatile和lock原理分析由作者收集整理，如果你对这篇文章有兴趣，记得点赞哟.
java 中volatile和lock原理分析 。
volatile和lock是Java中用于线程协同同步的两种机制.
Volatile 。
volatile是Java中的一个关键字，它的作用有 。
volatile在Java语言规范中规定的是 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
The Java programming language allows threads to access shared variables (§
17.1
). As a rule, to ensure
that shared variables are consistently and reliably updated, a thread should ensure that it
has exclusive use of such variables by obtaining a lock that, conventionally, enforces mutual
exclusion
for
those shared variables.
The Java programming language provides a second mechanism,
volatile
fields, that is more convenient
than locking
for
some purposes.
A field may be declared
volatile
, in which
case
the Java Memory Model ensures that all threads
see a consistent value
for
the variable .
It is a compile-time error
if
a
final
variable is also declared
volatile
.
|
Java内存模型中规定了volatile的happen-before效果，对volatile变量的写操作happen-before于后续的读。这样volatile变量能够确保一个线程的修改对其他线程可见。volatile因为不能保证原子性，所以不能在有约束或后验条件的场景下使用，如i++,常用的场景是stop变量保证系统停止对其他线程可见，double-check lock单例中防止重排序来保证安全发布等.
以下面这段代码为例 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
public
class
TestVolatile {
private
static
volatile
boolean
stop =
false
;
public
static
void
main(String[] args) {
stop =
true
;
boolean
b = stop;
}
}
|
stop字段声明为volatile类型后，编译后的字节码中其变量的access_flag中ACC_VOLATILE位置为1.
关键的字节码内容如下 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
public
static
void
main(java.lang.String[]);
descriptor: ([Ljava/lang/String;)V
flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=2, args_size=1
0: iconst_1
1: putstatic #2
// Field stop:Z
4: getstatic #2
// Field stop:Z
7: istore_1
8:
return
LineNumberTable:
line 14: 0
line 15: 4
line 16: 8
LocalVariableTable:
Start Length Slot Name Signature
0 9 0 args [Ljava/lang/String;
8 1 1 b Z
static
{};
descriptor: ()V
flags: ACC_STATIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=0, args_size=0
0: iconst_0
1: putstatic #2
// Field stop:Z
4:
return
LineNumberTable:
line 11: 0
}
|
通过hsdis查看虚拟机产生的汇编代码.
测试环境为java version “1.8.0_45”,MACOS10.12.1 i386:x86-64 。
在执行参数上添加 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
-XX:+LogCompilation
-XX:+PrintAssembly
-Xcomp
-XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,*TestVolatile.main
-XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,*TestVolatile.main
|
查看main方法的汇编指令结果 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
|
Decoding compiled method
0x000000010c732c50
:
Code:
[Disassembling
for
mach=
'i386:x86-64'
]
[Entry Point]
[Verified Entry Point]
[Constants]
# {method} {
0x000000012422a2c8
}
'main'
'([Ljava/lang/String;)V'
in
'com/concurrent/volatiles/TestVolatile'
# parm0: rsi:rsi =
'[Ljava/lang/String;'
# [sp+
0x40
] (sp of caller)
0x000000010c732da0
: mov %eax,-
0x14000
(%rsp)
0x000000010c732da7
: push %rbp
0x000000010c732da8
: sub $
0x30
,%rsp
0x000000010c732dac
: movabs $
0x12422a448
,%rdi ; {metadata(method data
for
{method} {
0x000000012422a2c8
}
'main'
'([Ljava/lang/String;)V'
in
'com/concurrent/volatiles/TestVolatile'
)}
0x000000010c732db6
: mov
0xdc
(%rdi),%ebx
0x000000010c732dbc
: add $
0x8
,%ebx
0x000000010c732dbf
: mov %ebx,
0xdc
(%rdi)
0x000000010c732dc5
: movabs $
0x12422a2c8
,%rdi ; {metadata({method} {
0x000000012422a2c8
}
'main'
'([Ljava/lang/String;)V'
in
'com/concurrent/volatiles/TestVolatile'
)}
0x000000010c732dcf
: and $
0x0
,%ebx
0x000000010c732dd2
: cmp $
0x0
,%ebx
0x000000010c732dd5
: je
0x000000010c732e03
;*iconst_1
; - com.concurrent.volatiles.TestVolatile::main
@0
(line
14
)
0x000000010c732ddb
: movabs $
0x76adce798
,%rsi ; {oop(a
'java/lang/Class'
=
'com/concurrent/volatiles/TestVolatile'
)}
0x000000010c732de5
: mov $
0x1
,%edi
0x000000010c732dea
: mov %dil,
0x68
(%rsi)
0x000000010c732dee
: lock addl $
0x0
,(%rsp) ;*putstatic stop
; - com.concurrent.volatiles.TestVolatile::main
@1
(line
14
)
0x000000010c732df3
: movsbl
0x68
(%rsi),%esi ;*getstatic stop
; - com.concurrent.volatiles.TestVolatile::main
@4
(line
15
)
0x000000010c732df7
: add $
0x30
,%rsp
0x000000010c732dfb
: pop %rbp
0x000000010c732dfc
: test %eax,-
0x3adbd02
(%rip) #
0x0000000108c57100
; {poll_return}
0x000000010c732e02
: retq
0x000000010c732e03
: mov %rdi,
0x8
(%rsp)
0x000000010c732e08
: movq $
0xffffffffffffffff
,(%rsp)
0x000000010c732e10
: callq
0x000000010c7267e0
; OopMap{rsi=Oop off=
117
}
;*synchronization entry
; - com.concurrent.volatiles.TestVolatile::main@-
1
(line
14
)
; {runtime_call}
0x000000010c732e15
: jmp
0x000000010c732ddb
0x000000010c732e17
: nop
0x000000010c732e18
: nop
0x000000010c732e19
: mov
0x2a8
(%r15),%rax
0x000000010c732e20
: movabs $
0x0
,%r10
0x000000010c732e2a
: mov %r10,
0x2a8
(%r15)
0x000000010c732e31
: movabs $
0x0
,%r10
0x000000010c732e3b
: mov %r10,
0x2b0
(%r15)
0x000000010c732e42
: add $
0x30
,%rsp
0x000000010c732e46
: pop %rbp
0x000000010c732e47
: jmpq
0x000000010c6940e0
; {runtime_call}
[Exception Handler]
|
可以看到在mov %dil,0x68(%rsi)给stop赋值后增加了lock addl $0x0,(%rsp) 。
IA32中对lock的说明是 。
|
1
2
3
|
The LOCK #
signal
is asserted during execution of the instruction following
the lock prefix. This
signal
can be used in a multiprocessor
system
to ensure
exclusive use of shared memory
while
LOCK # is asserted
|
lock用于在多处理器中执行指令时对共享内存的独占使用。它的副作用是能够将当前处理器对应缓存的内容刷新到内存，并使其他处理器对应的缓存失效。另外还提供了有序的指令无法越过这个内存屏障的作用.
Lock 。
Java中提供的锁的关键字是synchronized, 可以加在方法块上，也可以加在方法声明中.
synchronized关键字起到的作用是设置一个独占访问临界区，在进入这个临界区前要先获取对应的监视器锁，任何Java对象都可以成为监视器锁，声明在静态方法上时监视器锁是当前类的Class对象，实例方法上是当前实例。 synchronized提供了原子性、可见性和防止重排序的保证.
JMM中定义监视器锁的释放操作happen-before与后续的同一个监视器锁获取操作。再结合程序顺序规则就可以形成内存传递可见性保证.
下面以一段代码查看各个层次的实现 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
public
class
TestSynchronize {
private
int
count;
private
void
inc() {
synchronized
(
this
) {
count++;
}
}
public
static
void
main(String[] args) {
new
TestSynchronize().inc();
}
}
|
编译后inc方法的字节码为 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
|
private
void
inc();
descriptor: ()V
flags: ACC_PRIVATE
Code:
stack=
3
, locals=
3
, args_size=
1
0
: aload_0
1
: dup
2
: astore_1
3
: monitorenter
4
: aload_0
5
: dup
6
: getfield #
2
// Field count:I
9
: iconst_1
10
: iadd
11
: putfield #
2
// Field count:I
14
: aload_1
15
: monitorexit
16
:
goto
24
19
: astore_2
20
: aload_1
21
: monitorexit
22
: aload_2
23
: athrow
24
:
return
Exception table:
from to target type
4
16
19
any
19
22
19
any
LineNumberTable:
line
14
:
0
line
15
:
4
|
在synchronized代码块前后增加的monitorenter和monitorexist两个JVM字节码指令,指令的参数是this引用.
hotspot中对于monitor_enter和monitor_exit的处理是 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
void
LIRGenerator::monitor_enter(LIR_Opr object, LIR_Opr lock, LIR_Opr hdr, LIR_Opr scratch,
int
monitor_no, CodeEmitInfo* info_for_exception, CodeEmitInfo* info) {
if
(!GenerateSynchronizationCode)
return
;
// for slow path, use debug info for state after successful locking
CodeStub* slow_path =
new
MonitorEnterStub(object, lock, info);
__ load_stack_address_monitor(monitor_no, lock);
// for handling NullPointerException, use debug info representing just the lock stack before this monitorenter
__ lock_object(hdr, object, lock, scratch, slow_path, info_for_exception);
}
void
LIRGenerator::monitor_exit(LIR_Opr object, LIR_Opr lock, LIR_Opr new_hdr, LIR_Opr scratch,
int
monitor_no) {
if
(!GenerateSynchronizationCode)
return
;
// setup registers
LIR_Opr hdr = lock;
lock = new_hdr;
CodeStub* slow_path =
new
MonitorExitStub(lock, UseFastLocking, monitor_no);
__ load_stack_address_monitor(monitor_no, lock);
__ unlock_object(hdr, object, lock, scratch, slow_path);
}
|
inc方法在本机上输出的汇编代码为 。
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
|
Decoding compiled method 0x0000000115be3e50:
Code:
[Entry Point]
[Constants]
# {method} {0x0000000113082328} 'inc' '()V' in 'com/concurrent/lock/TestSynchronize'
# [sp+0x50] (sp of caller)
0x0000000115be3fc0: mov 0x8(%rsi),%r10d
0x0000000115be3fc4: shl $0x3,%r10
0x0000000115be3fc8:
cmp
%rax,%r10
0x0000000115be3fcb: jne 0x0000000115b1de20 ; {runtime_call}
0x0000000115be3fd1: data32 data32 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0x0000000115be3fdc: data32 data32 xchg %ax,%ax
[Verified Entry Point]
0x0000000115be3fe0: mov %eax,-0x14000(%rsp)
0x0000000115be3fe7: push %rbp
0x0000000115be3fe8: sub $0x40,%rsp
0x0000000115be3fec: movabs $0x113082848,%rax ; {metadata(method data
for
{method} {0x0000000113082328}
'inc'
'()V'
in
'com/concurrent/lock/TestSynchronize'
)}
0x0000000115be3ff6: mov 0xdc(%rax),%edi
0x0000000115be3ffc: add $0x8,%edi
0x0000000115be3fff: mov %edi,0xdc(%rax)
0x0000000115be4005: movabs $0x113082328,%rax ; {metadata({method} {0x0000000113082328}
'inc'
'()V'
in
'com/concurrent/lock/TestSynchronize'
)}
0x0000000115be400f: and $0x0,%edi
0x0000000115be4012:
cmp
$0x0,%edi
0x0000000115be4015: je 0x0000000115be418d ;*aload_0
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@0 (line 14)
0x0000000115be401b: lea 0x20(%rsp),%rdi
0x0000000115be4020: mov %rsi,0x8(%rdi)
0x0000000115be4024: mov (%rsi),%rax
0x0000000115be4027: mov %rax,%rbx
0x0000000115be402a: and $0x7,%rbx
0x0000000115be402e:
cmp
$0x5,%rbx
0x0000000115be4032: jne 0x0000000115be40b9
0x0000000115be4038: mov 0x8(%rsi),%ebx
0x0000000115be403b: shl $0x3,%rbx
0x0000000115be403f: mov 0xa8(%rbx),%rbx
0x0000000115be4046: or %r15,%rbx
0x0000000115be4049: xor %rax,%rbx
0x0000000115be404c: and $0xffffffffffffff87,%rbx
0x0000000115be4050: je 0x0000000115be40e1
0x0000000115be4056:
test
$0x7,%rbx
0x0000000115be405d: jne 0x0000000115be40a6
0x0000000115be405f:
test
$0x300,%rbx
0x0000000115be4066: jne 0x0000000115be4085
0x0000000115be4068: and $0x37f,%rax
0x0000000115be406f: mov %rax,%rbx
0x0000000115be4072: or %r15,%rbx
0x0000000115be4075: lock cmpxchg %rbx,(%rsi)
0x0000000115be407a: jne 0x0000000115be41a4
0x0000000115be4080: jmpq 0x0000000115be40e1
0x0000000115be4085: mov 0x8(%rsi),%ebx
0x0000000115be4088: shl $0x3,%rbx
0x0000000115be408c: mov 0xa8(%rbx),%rbx
0x0000000115be4093: or %r15,%rbx
0x0000000115be4096: lock cmpxchg %rbx,(%rsi)
0x0000000115be409b: jne 0x0000000115be41a4
0x0000000115be40a1: jmpq 0x0000000115be40e1
0x0000000115be40a6: mov 0x8(%rsi),%ebx
0x0000000115be40a9: shl $0x3,%rbx
0x0000000115be40ad: mov 0xa8(%rbx),%rbx
0x0000000115be40b4: lock cmpxchg %rbx,(%rsi)
0x0000000115be40b9: mov (%rsi),%rax
0x0000000115be40bc: or $0x1,%rax
0x0000000115be40c0: mov %rax,(%rdi)
0x0000000115be40c3: lock cmpxchg %rdi,(%rsi)
0x0000000115be40c8: je 0x0000000115be40e1
0x0000000115be40ce: sub %rsp,%rax
0x0000000115be40d1: and $0xfffffffffffff007,%rax
0x0000000115be40d8: mov %rax,(%rdi)
0x0000000115be40db: jne 0x0000000115be41a4 ;*monitorenter
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@3 (line 14)
0x0000000115be40e1: mov 0xc(%rsi),%eax ;*getfield count
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@6 (line 15)
0x0000000115be40e4: inc %eax
0x0000000115be40e6: mov %eax,0xc(%rsi) ;*putfield count
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@11 (line 15)
0x0000000115be40e9: lea 0x20(%rsp),%rax
0x0000000115be40ee: mov 0x8(%rax),%rdi
0x0000000115be40f2: mov (%rdi),%rsi
0x0000000115be40f5: and $0x7,%rsi
0x0000000115be40f9:
cmp
$0x5,%rsi
0x0000000115be40fd: je 0x0000000115be411a
0x0000000115be4103: mov (%rax),%rsi
0x0000000115be4106:
test
%rsi,%rsi
0x0000000115be4109: je 0x0000000115be411a
0x0000000115be410f: lock cmpxchg %rsi,(%rdi)
0x0000000115be4114: jne 0x0000000115be41b7 ;*monitorexit
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@15 (line 16)
0x0000000115be411a: movabs $0x113082848,%rax ; {metadata(method data
for
{method} {0x0000000113082328}
'inc'
'()V'
in
'com/concurrent/lock/TestSynchronize'
)}
0x0000000115be4124: incl 0x108(%rax) ;*goto
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@16 (line 16)
0x0000000115be412a: add $0x40,%rsp
0x0000000115be412e: pop %rbp
0x0000000115be412f:
test
%eax,-0x684e035(%rip)
# 0x000000010f396100
; {poll_return}
0x0000000115be4135: retq ;*
return
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@24 (line 17)
0x0000000115be4136: mov 0x2a8(%r15),%rax
0x0000000115be413d: xor %r10,%r10
0x0000000115be4140: mov %r10,0x2a8(%r15)
0x0000000115be4147: xor %r10,%r10
0x0000000115be414a: mov %r10,0x2b0(%r15)
0x0000000115be4151: mov %rax,%rsi
0x0000000115be4154: lea 0x20(%rsp),%rax
0x0000000115be4159: mov 0x8(%rax),%rbx
0x0000000115be415d: mov (%rbx),%rdi
0x0000000115be4160: and $0x7,%rdi
0x0000000115be4164:
cmp
$0x5,%rdi
0x0000000115be4168: je 0x0000000115be4185
0x0000000115be416e: mov (%rax),%rdi
0x0000000115be4171:
test
%rdi,%rdi
0x0000000115be4174: je 0x0000000115be4185
0x0000000115be417a: lock cmpxchg %rdi,(%rbx)
0x0000000115be417f: jne 0x0000000115be41ca ;*monitorexit
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@21 (line 16)
0x0000000115be4185: mov %rsi,%rax
0x0000000115be4188: jmpq 0x0000000115be4205
0x0000000115be418d: mov %rax,0x8(%rsp)
0x0000000115be4192: movq $0xffffffffffffffff,(%rsp)
0x0000000115be419a: callq 0x0000000115bd5be0 ; OopMap{rsi=Oop off=479}
;*synchronization entry
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@-1 (line 14)
; {runtime_call}
0x0000000115be419f: jmpq 0x0000000115be401b
0x0000000115be41a4: mov %rsi,0x8(%rsp)
0x0000000115be41a9: mov %rdi,(%rsp)
0x0000000115be41ad: callq 0x0000000115bd4060 ; OopMap{rsi=Oop [40]=Oop off=498}
;*monitorenter
; - com.concurrent.lock.TestSynchronize::inc@3 (line 14)
; {runtime_call}
0x0000000115be41b2: jmpq 0x0000000115be40e1
0x0000000115be41b7: lea 0x20(%rsp),%rax
0x0000000115be41bc: mov %rax,(%rsp)
0x0000000115be41c0: callq 0x0000000115bd4420 ; {runtime_call}
0x0000000115be41c5: jmpq 0x0000000115be411a
0x0000000115be41ca: lea 0x20(%rsp),%rax
0x0000000115be41cf: mov %rax,(%rsp)
0x0000000115be41d3: callq 0x0000000115bd4420 ; {runtime_call}
0x0000000115be41d8: jmp 0x0000000115be4185
0x0000000115be41da: nop
0x0000000115be41db: nop
0x0000000115be41dc: mov 0x2a8(%r15),%rax
0x0000000115be41e3: movabs $0x0,%r10
0x0000000115be41ed: mov %r10,0x2a8(%r15)
0x0000000115be41f4: movabs $0x0,%r10
0x0000000115be41fe: mov %r10,0x2b0(%r15)
0x0000000115be4205: add $0x40,%rsp
0x0000000115be4209: pop %rbp
0x0000000115be420a: jmpq 0x0000000115b440e0 ; {runtime_call}
[Exception Handler]
|
其中lock cmpxchg为Compare And Exchange 。
|
1
2
3
4
|
CMPXCHG compares its destination (first) operand to the
value in AL, AX or EAX (depending on the size of the instruction).
If they are equal, it copies its source (second) operand into the destination
and sets the zero flag. Otherwise, it clears the zero flag and leaves the destination alone.
|
CMPXCHG is intended to be used for atomic operations in multitasking or multiprocessor environments. To safely update a value in shared memory, for example, you might load the value into EAX, load the updated value into EBX, and then execute the instruction lock cmpxchg [value],ebx. If value has not changed since being loaded, it is updated with your desired new value, and the zero flag is set to let you know it has worked. (The LOCK prefix prevents another processor doing anything in the middle of this operation: it guarantees atomicity.) However, if another processor has modified the value in between your load and your attempted store, the store does not happen, and you are notified of the failure by a cleared zero flag, so you can go round and try again. 。
感谢阅读，希望能帮助到大家，谢谢大家对本站的支持！ 。
原文链接：https://liuzhengyang.github.io/2017/03/28/volatileandlock/ 。
最后此篇关于java 中volatile和lock原理分析的文章就讲到这里了,如果你想了解更多关于java 中volatile和lock原理分析的内容请搜索CFSDN的文章或继续浏览相关文章，希望大家以后支持我的博客！ 。
24
4
0
这将是一篇很长的文章，为了将其上下文化并提供尽可能多的信息，我必须仔细浏览各种链接和引号——这通常是我们进入 C/C++ 标准兔子洞的唯一方法。如果您对这篇文章有更好的引用或任何其他改进，请告诉我。但
我想知道 volatile 关键字与 register、const 和 static 结合的不同用途关键词。我不确定有什么影响，所以我认为: register volatile int T=10; 建
让我们考虑以下 Java 代码 int x = 0; int who = 1 Thread #1: (1) x++; (2) who = 2; Thread #2 while(who
有一个函数“remove_cv”(http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/remove_cv)可以删除常量和 volatile 。 我的问题是为什么可以从“con
我正在尝试在下面的“MpscQueue.h”中的嵌入式目标上实现多个生产者(通过中断)、单个消费者(通过应用程序线程)队列。 我想知道我是否可以安全地删除一些 volatile下面的用法(见内联问
我的问题适用于最初为 null 的字段，然后初始化为非 null 值，然后不再更改。 由于该字段需要尽快可供所有线程使用，因此我需要使用 volatile 。 但是，如果我想尽可能避免 volatil
我以前见过几次类似 fld = fld 的东西，但在所有这些情况下，可以消除虚拟写入并获得更好的性能。 public class Tst{ public volatile int fld =
看完this question和 this (尤其是第二个答案)我对 volatile 及其与内存屏障有关的语义感到非常困惑。 在上面的例子中，我们写入了一个 volatile 变量，这会导致一个 m
如下所示，该程序有一个共享 var flag，但不带 volatile : public class T { public static void main(String[] args) {
我明白声明 int *volatile ptr; 表示指针本身是volatile int a=10; int *volatile ptr=&a; 现在 ptr 和 a 都在更新。会不会导致访问ptr时
最近我需要比较两个 uint 数组(一个是 volatile 数组，另一个是非 volatile 数组)，结果令人困惑，我一定是对 volatile 数组有一些误解。 我需要从输入设备读取一个数组并将
这两个 C 定义有什么区别？ volatile uint32_t *ptr1 = (volatile uint32_t *)0x20040000; volatile uint32_t *ptr1 =
// structure is like this, but not exact formation. class queue { volatile List worksWaiting; }
考虑以下这段代码: struct S{ int i; S(int); S(const volatile S&); }; struct S_bad{ int i; }; vola
在 Windows x64 上，考虑到一些额外的见解，何时允许编译器将 ABI 标记为 volatile 的寄存器视为非 volatile 寄存器？我有一个反汇编函数，其中 r11 用于在函数调用后恢
我对下面的代码段有疑问。结果可能有 [0, 1, 0] 的结果(这是用 JCStress 执行的测试)。那么这怎么会发生呢？我认为应该在写入 Actor2 (guard2 = 1) 中的 guard2
好吧，假设我有一堆变量，其中一个声明为 volatile: int a; int b; int c; volatile int v; 如果一个线程写入所有四个变量(最后写入 v)，而另一个线程读取所有
我试图理解为什么这个例子是一个正确同步的程序: a - volatile Thread1: x=a Thread2: a=5 因为存在冲突访问(存在对 a 的写入和读取)，所以在每个顺序一致性执行中，
我正在编写一个需要同时支持 volatile 和非 volatile 实例的类( volatile 实例使用原子操作，非 volatile 实例使用常规操作)，并且想知道我是否以正确的方式进行处理。到
我正在为 Cortex-M0 CPU 和 gcc 编写代码。我有以下结构: struct { volatile unsigned flag1: 1; unsigned flag2: 1
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀！