gpt4 book ai didi

functional-programming - 在 OCaml 中实现 Okasaki 的自举堆,为什么不编译?

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-04 19:13:00 26 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

(可以在 https://gist.github.com/4044467 找到一个最小的非编译示例,请参阅下面的更多背景信息。)

我正在尝试实现冈崎的纯功能数据结构第 10 章中介绍的引导堆。以下是我的非编译代码的简化版本。

我们要实现一个具有以下签名的堆:

module type ORDERED =
sig
type t
val compare : t -> t -> int
end

module type HEAP =
sig
module Elem : ORDERED

type heap

val empty : heap
val insert : Elem.t -> heap -> heap
val find_min : heap -> Elem.t
val delete_min : heap -> heap
end

我们说一个数据结构是 自举当它的实现依赖于同一种数据结构的另一个实现时。所以我们有一个这样的堆(实际的实现并不重要):
module SomeHeap (Element : ORDERED) : (HEAP with module Elem = Element) =
struct
module Elem = Element

type heap

let empty = failwith "skipped"
let insert = failwith "skipped"
let find_min = failwith "skipped"
let delete_min = failwith "skipped"
end

然后,我们将要实现的引导堆,它可以依赖于任何堆实现,应该具有以下签名:
module BootstrappedHeap
(MakeH : functor (Element : ORDERED) -> HEAP with module Elem = Element)
(Element : ORDERED) : (HEAP with module Elem = Element)

所以我们可以这样使用它:
module StringHeap = BootstrappedHeap(SomeHeap)(String)

根据 Okasaki 的说法,BootstrappedHeap 的实现是这样的:
module BootstrappedHeap
(MakeH : functor (Element : ORDERED) -> HEAP with module Elem = Element)
(Element : ORDERED) : (HEAP with module Elem = Element) =
struct
module Elem = Element

module rec BootstrappedElem :
sig
type t =
| E
| H of Elem.t * PrimH.heap
val compare : t -> t -> int
end =
struct
type t =
| E
| H of Elem.t * PrimH.heap
let compare t1 t2 = match t1, t2 with
| H (x, _), H (y, _) -> Elem.compare x y
| _ -> failwith "unreachable"
end
and PrimH : (HEAP with module Elem = BootstrappedElem) =
MakeH(BootstrappedElem)

type heap

let empty = failwith "not implemented"
let insert = failwith "not implemented"
let find_min = failwith "not implemented"
let delete_min = failwith "not implemented"
end

但这不是编译!错误信息是:
File "ordered.ml", line 52, characters 15-55:
Error: In this `with' constraint, the new definition of Elem
does not match its original definition in the constrained signature:
Modules do not match:
sig type t = BootstrappedElem.t end
is not included in
ORDERED
The field `compare' is required but not provided

第52行是行
and PrimH : (HEAP with module Elem = BootstrappedElem) =

我认为 BootstrappedElem确实实现了 ORDERED因为它同时具有 tcompare ,但我看不出为什么编译器找不到 compare功能。

将 BootstrappedElem 的签名更改为
module rec BootstrappedElem : ORDERED

将使其编译,但这将隐藏类型构造函数 ETBootstrappedElem使后面的部分无法实现。

完整的非编译代码可以在 https://raw.github.com/gist/4044281/0ce0336c40b277e59cece43dbadb9b94ce6efdaf/ordered.ml 下载。

最佳答案

我相信这可能是类型检查器中的一个错误。我已将您的代码简化为以下示例:

module type ORDERED =
sig
type t
val compare : t -> t -> int
end


module type CARRY = sig
module M : ORDERED
end

(* works *)
module HigherOrderFunctor
(Make : functor (X : ORDERED) -> (CARRY with module M = X))
= struct
module rec Base
: (ORDERED with type t = string)
= String
and Other
: (CARRY with module M = Base)
= Make(Base)
end

(* does not work *)
module HigherOrderFunctor
(Make : functor (X : ORDERED) -> (CARRY with module M = X))
= struct
module rec Base
: sig
(* 'compare' seems dropped from this signature *)
type t = string
val compare : t -> t -> int
end
= String
and Other
: (CARRY with module M = (Base : sig type t = string val compare : t -> t -> int end))
= Make(Base)
end

我不明白为什么第一个代码有效而第二个(似乎等效)无效。我建议您稍等一下,看看专家是否有解释(安德烈亚斯?),然后考虑发送 a bug report .

在这种情况下,一种解决方案是首先绑定(bind)似乎处理不当的签名:
(* works again *)
module HigherOrderFunctor
(Make : functor (X : ORDERED) -> (CARRY with module M = X))
= struct
(* bind the problematic signature first *)
module type S = sig
type t = string
val compare : t -> t -> int
end

module rec Base : S = String
and Other : (CARRY with module M = Base) = Make(Base)
end

但是,这在您的设置中是不可能的,因为 BootstrappedElem 的签名与 BootstrappedHeap 相互递归.

一种解决方法是避免明显微妙的 with module ...构造并用简单的类型相等替换它 with type Elem.t = ... :
module BootstrappedHeap
(MakeH : functor (Element : ORDERED) -> HEAP with module Elem = Element)
(Element : ORDERED) : (HEAP with module Elem = Element) =
struct
module Elem = Element

module rec BootstrappedElem :
sig
type t =
| E
| H of Elem.t * PrimH.heap
val compare : t -> t -> int
end =
struct
type t =
| E
| H of Elem.t * PrimH.heap
let compare t1 t2 = match t1, t2 with
| H (x, _), H (y, _) -> Elem.compare x y
| _ -> failwith "unreachable"
end
and PrimH : (HEAP with type Elem.t = BootstrappedElem.t) =
MakeH(BootstrappedElem)

type heap

let empty = failwith "not implemented"
let insert = failwith "not implemented"
let find_min = failwith "not implemented"
let delete_min = failwith "not implemented"
end

您还可以避免相互递归并同时定义 BootstrappedElemBootstrappedHeap在一个递归结中,通过定义 BootstrappedElem递归内 BootstrappedHeap .
module BootstrappedHeap
(MakeH : functor (Element : ORDERED) -> HEAP with module Elem = Element)
(Element : ORDERED) : (HEAP with module Elem = Element) =
struct
module rec BootstrappedHeap : sig
module Elem : sig
type t = E | H of Element.t * BootstrappedHeap.heap
val compare : t -> t -> int
end
include (HEAP with module Elem := Elem)
end = struct
module Elem = struct
type t = E | H of Element.t * BootstrappedHeap.heap
let compare t1 t2 = match t1, t2 with
| H (x, _), H (y, _) -> Element.compare x y
| _ -> failwith "unreachable"
end
include (MakeH(Elem) : HEAP with module Elem := Elem)
end

module Elem = Element

type heap

let empty = failwith "not implemented"
let insert = failwith "not implemented"
let find_min = failwith "not implemented"
let delete_min = failwith "not implemented"
end

这种风格自然对应于您嵌入 Elem 的决定。在 HEAP签名和使用 with module ...为细化。另一种解决方案是定义 HEAP作为返回签名的仿函数,用作 HEAP(Elem).S ,我想可以选择不同的递归样式。并不是说这样会更好:我认为“抽象模块”样式更方便。

关于functional-programming - 在 OCaml 中实现 Okasaki 的自举堆,为什么不编译?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13304044/

26 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com