gpt4 book ai didi

neural-network - 当我在 tensorflow 中对神经网络进行批量评估而不是一一评估时,我得到了不同的结果,这是怎么回事?

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-04 16:06:26 25 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我基于this tutorial构建了一个回归卷积神经网络在 tensorflow 网站上。
当我一次评估多个图像的结果时,我得到的结果与我逐个评估这些图像时的结果不同。

更具体地说,对于三个相同的示例图像,我得到 [ 729027.5625 729027.5625 729027.5625]当我批量计算它们的输出时,我得到 [ 729026.4375] [ 729026.4375] [ 729026.4375]当我一一计算图像的输出时。

知道为什么会这样吗?我的神经网络的输入定义如下:

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 784])

在执行批量评估时,我输入了一个二维 numpy 图像数组 (shape = (100, 784))
编辑:请参阅下面的 MWE

mwe_db.npy
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data
mnist = input_data.read_data_sets('MNIST_data', one_hot=True)
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np

def weight_variable(shape):
initial = tf.truncated_normal(shape, stddev=0.1)
return tf.Variable(initial)

def bias_variable(shape):
initial = tf.constant(0.1, shape=shape)
return tf.Variable(initial)

def conv2d(x, W):
return tf.nn.conv2d(x, W, strides=[1, 1, 1, 1], padding='SAME')

def max_pool_2x2(x):
return tf.nn.max_pool(x, ksize=[1, 2, 2, 1], strides=[1, 2, 2, 1], padding='SAME')


sess = tf.Session()

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 784])
y_ = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 10])
x_image = tf.reshape(x, [-1,28,28,1])

W_conv1 = weight_variable([5, 5, 1, 32])
b_conv1 = bias_variable([32])
h_conv1 = tf.nn.relu(conv2d(x_image, W_conv1) + b_conv1)
h_pool1 = max_pool_2x2(h_conv1)

W_conv2 = weight_variable([5, 5, 32, 64])
b_conv2 = bias_variable([64])
h_conv2 = tf.nn.relu(conv2d(h_pool1, W_conv2) + b_conv2)
h_pool2 = max_pool_2x2(h_conv2)

W_fc1 = weight_variable([7 * 7 * 64, 1024])
b_fc1 = bias_variable([1024])
h_pool2_flat = tf.reshape(h_pool2, [-1, 7*7*64])
h_fc1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.matmul(h_pool2_flat, W_fc1) + b_fc1)

keep_prob = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
h_fc1_drop = tf.nn.dropout(h_fc1, keep_prob)

W_fc2 = weight_variable([1024, 10])
b_fc2 = bias_variable([10])
y_conv = tf.matmul(h_fc1_drop, W_fc2) + b_fc2

cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(y_conv, y_))
train_step = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(1e-4).minimize(cross_entropy)
correct_prediction = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_conv,1), tf.argmax(y_,1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_prediction, tf.float32))
sess.run(tf.initialize_all_variables())
for i in range(20000):
batch = mnist.train.next_batch(50)
if i%100 == 0:
train_accuracy = accuracy.eval(feed_dict={
x:batch[0], y_: batch[1], keep_prob: 1.0}, session=sess)
print("step %d, training accuracy %g"%(i, train_accuracy))
train_step.run(feed_dict={x: batch[0], y_: batch[1], keep_prob: 0.5}, session=sess)

print("test accuracy %g"%accuracy.eval(feed_dict={
x: mnist.test.images, y_: mnist.test.labels, keep_prob: 1.0}, session=sess))

####################
# THE ANOMALY
####################

print "----------------------"
print "THE ANOMALY"
print "----------------------"

mwe_db = np.load("mwe_db.npy")
num_rows = mwe_db.shape[0]

batch_y = y_conv.eval(feed_dict={x: mwe_db[0:2, :], keep_prob: 1.0}, session=sess)
print batch_y

print "----------------------"

for i in xrange(2):
single_y = y_conv.eval(feed_dict={x: mwe_db[i:i+1, :], keep_prob: 1.0}, session=sess)
print single_y

最佳答案

所以,我没有明确的答案,但 tf.matmul 是罪魁祸首。最小的工作示例:

import numpy as np
np.random.seed(123)
import tensorflow as tf

tf.set_random_seed(123)

# To enforce determinism
sess = tf.Session(config=tf.ConfigProto(
inter_op_parallelism_threads=1,
intra_op_parallelism_threads=1,
device_count={'GPU': 0}
))

init = np.random.rand(2,50)
x1=tf.Variable(init, dtype=tf.float32)
x2=tf.Variable(init[:1], dtype=tf.float32)

W=tf.Variable(np.random.rand(50,50), dtype=tf.float32)

sess.run(tf.initialize_all_variables())

r1 = tf.matmul(x1, W)
r2 = tf.matmul(x2, W)
v1, v2 = sess.run([r1, r2])
print(v1[0] - v2)

关于neural-network - 当我在 tensorflow 中对神经网络进行批量评估而不是一一评估时,我得到了不同的结果,这是怎么回事?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40060878/

25 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com