c# - 为什么 ArrayPool 上的分配比 Stack 上的分配快？

Question

我有以下基准测试，它使用堆栈分配、堆分配和 ArrayPool 分配从文件中读取字符串。

我希望堆栈分配是最快的，因为它只是堆栈指针增量，但根据基准 ArrayPool 稍微快一点。

怎么可能？

static void Main(string[] args)
{         
     BenchmarkRunner.Run<BenchmarkRead>();          
}

using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
using System;
using System.Buffers;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;

namespace RealTime.Benchmark
{
[MemoryDiagnoser]
public class BenchmarkRead
{
    const string TestFile = "TestFiles/animals.txt";

    public BenchmarkRead()
    {
        Directory.CreateDirectory(Path.GetDirectoryName(TestFile));
        // cca 100 KB of text
        string content = string.Concat(Enumerable.Repeat("dog,cat,spider,cat,bird,", 4000));
        File.WriteAllText(TestFile, content);
    }

    [Benchmark]
    public void ReadFileOnPool() => ReadFileOnPool(TestFile);

    [Benchmark]
    public void ReadFileOnHeap() => ReadFileOnHeap(TestFile);

    [Benchmark]
    public void ReadFileOnStack() => ReadFileOnStack(TestFile);

    public void ReadFileOnHeap(string filename)
    {
        string text = File.ReadAllText(filename);
        // ....call parse
    }

    public void ReadFileOnStack(string filename)
    {
        Span<byte> span = stackalloc byte[1024 * 200];
        using (var stream = File.OpenRead(filename))
        {
            int count = stream.Read(span);
            if (count == span.Length)
                throw new Exception($"Buffer size {span.Length} too small, use array pooling.");
            span = span.Slice(0, count);
            // ....call parse
        }
    }

    public void ReadFileOnPool(string filename)
    {
        ArrayPool<byte> pool = ArrayPool<byte>.Shared;
        using (var stream = File.OpenRead(filename))
        {
            long len = stream.Length;
            byte[] buffer = pool.Rent((int)len);
            try
            {
                int count = stream.Read(buffer, 0, (int)len);
                if (count != len)
                    throw new Exception($"{count} != {len}");

                Span<byte> span = new Span<byte>(buffer).Slice(0, count);
                // ....call parse
            }
            finally
            {
                pool.Return(buffer);
            }
        }
    }
}
}

结果:

|          Method |     Mean | Gen 0/1k Op | Gen 2/1k Op |Al. memory/Op|
|---------------- |---------:|------------:|------------:|------------:|
|  ReadFileOnPool | 109.9 us |      0.1221 |           - |       480 B |
|  ReadFileOnHeap | 506.0 us |     87.8906 |     58.5938 |    393440 B |
| ReadFileOnStack | 115.2 us |      0.1221 |           - |       480 B |

Answer 1

Span<byte> span = stackalloc byte[1024 * 200]由于 InitLocals 将被零初始化.

byte[] buffer = pool.Rent((int)len);根本不会被零初始化。

因此，您已经达到零初始化本地数组的成本比整个 Rent() 更昂贵的地步。常规。

几个月前，我实际上为此专门创建了一个 nuget 包 https://github.com/josetr/InitLocals但我们很快就会从微软那里得到类似的东西: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/29026 .