sql - MS SQL Server 功能性能问题

Question

希望有人可以帮助我解决 MS SQL 函数性能问题。
我有以下功能可以匹配同一个表中的用户。用户 A 正在搜索他可以匹配的用户。如果他发现用户 B 符合他的条件，则用户 B 会检查用户 A 是否符合他们的条件。如果它们已经匹配，则它们位于 ExcludedCandidates 表中。
我遇到的问题是查询花费的时间太长。
我尝试了很多东西，但没有更多关于如何改进它的想法。
也许对查询的一些索引或更改可能会有所帮助。
任何帮助都会得到认可。

create function [dbo].[FindUser](@UserId uniqueidentifier, @dis int, @gen int, @age datetime, @f int, @ti int, @s int, @La float, @Lo float)
returns @T table (UserId uniqueidentifier, Profile nvarchar(MAX), Filter nvarchar(MAX), F int, I bit, IsP bit)
as
BEGIN
    
    declare @Tmp table(UserId uniqueidentifier, a nvarchar(MAX), b nvarchar(MAX), c int, d bit, e bit)

    DECLARE @source geography
    select @source = geography::Point(@La, @Lo, 4326)

    insert into @Tmp
    SELECT TOP 10 U.UserId, U.Profile, U.F, @s as Fil, U.Ve, U.TT from Users AS U WITH (NOLOCK)
    WHERE ((@gen & U.Ge) != 0) AND
    (Sea = 1 OR Sea = 2) AND
    @s = U.Sear AND
    U.La is not null and U.Lon is not null AND
    @dis >= (@source.STDistance(geography::Point(U.La, U.Lon, 4326)) / 1000) AND
    (@f <= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age)) AND (@ti >= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age)) AND
    U.UserId != @UserId
    and not exists
    (select TOP 1 IC1.InitiatorUserId from ExcludedCandidates AS IC1 with (NOLOCK)
    where (IC1.InitiatorUserId = @UserId and IC1.PartnerUserId = U.UserId) OR
    (IC1.InitiatorUserId = U.UserId and IC1.PartnerUserId = @UserId)) 
    and exists(

        SELECT U.UserId from Users UserP with (NOLOCK)
        WHERE ((JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.gender') & U.Ge) != 0) AND
        (Sea = 1 OR Sea = 2) AND
        @s = Sea AND
        (JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.age.lo') <= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age)) AND (JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.age.up') >= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age)) AND
         JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.di') >= (geography::Point(UserP.La, UserP.Lon, 4326).STDistance(geography::Point(@La, @Lo, 4326)) / 1000) AND
        UserId = U.UserId

    )
    order by U.Sea DESC
    
    insert into @T
    select UserId, a, b, c, d, e from @Tmp


    return 
END

我们使用的索引

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [NonClusteredIndex_Users_Search] ON [dbo].[Users]
(
    [Sea] DESC
)WITH (STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF) ON [PRIMARY]
GO

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [NonClusteredIndex_Users_SearchSearchState] ON [dbo].[Users]
(
    [Sear] ASC,
    [Sea] ASC
)
INCLUDE (   [Filter],
    [La],
    [Lon]) WITH (STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF) ON [PRIMARY]
GO

Answer 1

您在这里拥有的是一个多行表值函数，众所周知，它的性能很差。您很可能会发现将其转换为内联表值函数将提供更好的性能。
由于没有其他对象的定义，我无法对此进行测试(因此没有检查任何语法错误)，但是，这是到内联表值函数的字面转换。但是，您可能在这里可以做更多的事情(例如 @dis >= (V.srv.STDistance(geography::Point(U.La, U.Lon, 4326)) / 1000) 不是 SARGable)，但是如果没有真正的目标，以及样本数据和预期结果，除了猜测之外，这将是不可能的:

CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[FindUser](@UserId uniqueidentifier, @dis int, @gen int, @age datetime, @f int, @ti int, @s int, @La float, @Lo float)
RETURNS table --@T table (UserId uniqueidentifier, Profile nvarchar(MAX), Filter nvarchar(MAX), F int, I bit, IsP bit)
AS RETURN

    
    --declare @Tmp table(UserId uniqueidentifier, a nvarchar(MAX), b nvarchar(MAX), c int, d bit, e bit)
    --
    --DECLARE @source geography
    --select @source = geography::Point(@La, @Lo, 4326)

    SELECT TOP (10)
           U.UserId,
           U.Profile,
           U.F,
           @s as Fil,
           U.Ve,
           U.TT
    FROM dbo.Users AS U-- WITH (NOLOCK) --Unless you really undersatnd what NOLOCK does, you shou.dn't be using this.
         CROSS APPLY(VALUES(geography::Point(@La, @Lo, 4326)))V(src)
    WHERE ((@gen & U.Ge) != 0)
      AND (Sea = 1 OR Sea = 2)
      AND @s = U.Sear
      AND U.La IS NOT NULL
      and U.Lon IS NOT NULL
      AND @dis >= (V.srv.STDistance(geography::Point(U.La, U.Lon, 4326)) / 1000)
      AND (@f <= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age)) AND (@ti >= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age))
      AND U.UserId != @UserId
      AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 --No need for a TOP (1) here
                      FROM ExcludedCandidates AS IC1-- with (NOLOCK) --Unless you really undersatnd what NOLOCK does, you shou.dn't be using this.
                      WHERE (IC1.InitiatorUserId = @UserId AND IC1.PartnerUserId = U.UserId)
                         OR (IC1.InitiatorUserId = U.UserId AND IC1.PartnerUserId = @UserId)) 
      AND exists(SELECT 1
               from Users UserP-- with (NOLOCK) --Unless you really undersatnd what NOLOCK does, you shou.dn't be using this.
               WHERE ((JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.gender') & U.Ge) != 0)
                 AND (Sea = 1 OR Sea = 2)
                 AND @s = Sea
                 AND (JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.age.lo') <= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age))
                 AND (JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.age.up') >= YEAR(GETUTCDATE()) - YEAR(@age))
                 AND JSON_VALUE(UserP.Filter, '$.di') >= (geography::Point(UserP.La, UserP.Lon, 4326).STDistance(geography::Point(@La, @Lo, 4326)) / 1000)
                 AND UserId = U.UserId)
    ORDER BY U.Sea DESC;

GO