- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我需要使用 DbContextTransaction
在 .Net 标准库的一个类中,我找不到相应的 nuget 包,我正在移植这个 https://github.com/mehdime/DbContextScope/tree/master/Mehdime.Entity到 .Net Core,但由于缺少包/依赖项,我只有 2 个编译错误,我不确定如何找到:
Error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'MarshalByRefObject' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (CS0246) (Mehdime.Entity)
Error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'DbContextTransaction' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) (CS0246) (Mehdime.Entity)
/*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Mehdi El Gueddari
* http://mehdi.me
*
* This software may be modified and distributed under the terms
* of the MIT license. See the LICENSE file for details.
*/
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Data;
using System.Runtime.ExceptionServices;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
namespace Mehdime.Entity
{
/// <summary>
/// As its name suggests, DbContextCollection maintains a collection of DbContext instances.
///
/// What it does in a nutshell:
/// - Lazily instantiates DbContext instances when its Get Of TDbContext () method is called
/// (and optionally starts an explicit database transaction).
/// - Keeps track of the DbContext instances it created so that it can return the existing
/// instance when asked for a DbContext of a specific type.
/// - Takes care of committing / rolling back changes and transactions on all the DbContext
/// instances it created when its Commit() or Rollback() method is called.
///
/// </summary>
public class DbContextCollection : IDbContextCollection
{
private Dictionary<Type, DbContext> _initializedDbContexts;
private Dictionary<DbContext, DbContextTransaction> _transactions;
private IsolationLevel? _isolationLevel;
private readonly IDbContextFactory _dbContextFactory;
private bool _disposed;
private bool _completed;
private bool _readOnly;
internal Dictionary<Type, DbContext> InitializedDbContexts { get { return _initializedDbContexts; } }
public DbContextCollection(bool readOnly = false, IsolationLevel? isolationLevel = null, IDbContextFactory dbContextFactory = null)
{
_disposed = false;
_completed = false;
_initializedDbContexts = new Dictionary<Type, DbContext>();
_transactions = new Dictionary<DbContext, DbContextTransaction>();
_readOnly = readOnly;
_isolationLevel = isolationLevel;
_dbContextFactory = dbContextFactory;
}
public TDbContext Get<TDbContext>() where TDbContext : DbContext
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("DbContextCollection");
var requestedType = typeof(TDbContext);
if (!_initializedDbContexts.ContainsKey(requestedType))
{
// First time we've been asked for this particular DbContext type.
// Create one, cache it and start its database transaction if needed.
var dbContext = _dbContextFactory != null
? _dbContextFactory.CreateDbContext<TDbContext>()
: Activator.CreateInstance<TDbContext>();
_initializedDbContexts.Add(requestedType, dbContext);
if (_readOnly)
{
dbContext.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;
}
if (_isolationLevel.HasValue)
{
var tran = dbContext.Database.BeginTransaction(_isolationLevel.Value);
_transactions.Add(dbContext, tran);
}
}
return _initializedDbContexts[requestedType] as TDbContext;
}
public int Commit()
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("DbContextCollection");
if (_completed)
throw new InvalidOperationException("You can't call Commit() or Rollback() more than once on a DbContextCollection. All the changes in the DbContext instances managed by this collection have already been saved or rollback and all database transactions have been completed and closed. If you wish to make more data changes, create a new DbContextCollection and make your changes there.");
// Best effort. You'll note that we're not actually implementing an atomic commit
// here. It entirely possible that one DbContext instance will be committed successfully
// and another will fail. Implementing an atomic commit would require us to wrap
// all of this in a TransactionScope. The problem with TransactionScope is that
// the database transaction it creates may be automatically promoted to a
// distributed transaction if our DbContext instances happen to be using different
// databases. And that would require the DTC service (Distributed Transaction Coordinator)
// to be enabled on all of our live and dev servers as well as on all of our dev workstations.
// Otherwise the whole thing would blow up at runtime.
// In practice, if our services are implemented following a reasonably DDD approach,
// a business transaction (i.e. a service method) should only modify entities in a single
// DbContext. So we should never find ourselves in a situation where two DbContext instances
// contain uncommitted changes here. We should therefore never be in a situation where the below
// would result in a partial commit.
ExceptionDispatchInfo lastError = null;
var c = 0;
foreach (var dbContext in _initializedDbContexts.Values)
{
try
{
if (!_readOnly)
{
c += dbContext.SaveChanges();
}
// If we've started an explicit database transaction, time to commit it now.
var tran = GetValueOrDefault(_transactions, dbContext);
if (tran != null)
{
tran.Commit();
tran.Dispose();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
lastError = ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture(e);
}
}
_transactions.Clear();
_completed = true;
if (lastError != null)
lastError.Throw(); // Re-throw while maintaining the exception's original stack track
return c;
}
public Task<int> CommitAsync()
{
return CommitAsync(CancellationToken.None);
}
public async Task<int> CommitAsync(CancellationToken cancelToken)
{
if (cancelToken == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("cancelToken");
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("DbContextCollection");
if (_completed)
throw new InvalidOperationException("You can't call Commit() or Rollback() more than once on a DbContextCollection. All the changes in the DbContext instances managed by this collection have already been saved or rollback and all database transactions have been completed and closed. If you wish to make more data changes, create a new DbContextCollection and make your changes there.");
// See comments in the sync version of this method for more details.
ExceptionDispatchInfo lastError = null;
var c = 0;
foreach (var dbContext in _initializedDbContexts.Values)
{
try
{
if (!_readOnly)
{
c += await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(cancelToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
// If we've started an explicit database transaction, time to commit it now.
var tran = GetValueOrDefault(_transactions, dbContext);
if (tran != null)
{
tran.Commit();
tran.Dispose();
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
lastError = ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture(e);
}
}
_transactions.Clear();
_completed = true;
if (lastError != null)
lastError.Throw(); // Re-throw while maintaining the exception's original stack track
return c;
}
public void Rollback()
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("DbContextCollection");
if (_completed)
throw new InvalidOperationException("You can't call Commit() or Rollback() more than once on a DbContextCollection. All the changes in the DbContext instances managed by this collection have already been saved or rollback and all database transactions have been completed and closed. If you wish to make more data changes, create a new DbContextCollection and make your changes there.");
ExceptionDispatchInfo lastError = null;
foreach (var dbContext in _initializedDbContexts.Values)
{
// There's no need to explicitly rollback changes in a DbContext as
// DbContext doesn't save any changes until its SaveChanges() method is called.
// So "rolling back" for a DbContext simply means not calling its SaveChanges()
// method.
// But if we've started an explicit database transaction, then we must roll it back.
var tran = GetValueOrDefault(_transactions, dbContext);
if (tran != null)
{
try
{
tran.Rollback();
tran.Dispose();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
lastError = ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture(e);
}
}
}
_transactions.Clear();
_completed = true;
if (lastError != null)
lastError.Throw(); // Re-throw while maintaining the exception's original stack track
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (_disposed)
return;
// Do our best here to dispose as much as we can even if we get errors along the way.
// Now is not the time to throw. Correctly implemented applications will have called
// either Commit() or Rollback() first and would have got the error there.
if (!_completed)
{
try
{
if (_readOnly) Commit();
else Rollback();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(e);
}
}
foreach (var dbContext in _initializedDbContexts.Values)
{
try
{
dbContext.Dispose();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(e);
}
}
_initializedDbContexts.Clear();
_disposed = true;
}
/// <summary>
/// Returns the value associated with the specified key or the default
/// value for the TValue type.
/// </summary>
private static TValue GetValueOrDefault<TKey, TValue>(IDictionary<TKey, TValue> dictionary, TKey key)
{
TValue value;
return dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out value) ? value : default(TValue);
}
}
}
最佳答案
没有统一的DbContextTransaction
Entity Framework 核心中的类。 IDbContextTransaction
而是声明了接口(interface)。
IDbContextTransaction transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction();
关于c# - .Net Core 中的 DbContextTransaction 在哪里,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43949175/
我想做的是让 JTextPane 在 JPanel 中占用尽可能多的空间。对于我使用的 UpdateInfoPanel: public class UpdateInfoPanel extends JP
我在 JPanel 中有一个 JTextArea,我想将其与 JScrollPane 一起使用。我正在使用 GridBagLayout。当我运行它时,框架似乎为 JScrollPane 腾出了空间,但
我想在 xcode 中实现以下功能。 我有一个 View Controller 。在这个 UIViewController 中,我有一个 UITabBar。它们下面是一个 UIView。将 UITab
有谁知道Firebird 2.5有没有类似于SQL中“STUFF”函数的功能? 我有一个包含父用户记录的表,另一个表包含与父相关的子用户记录。我希望能够提取用户拥有的“ROLES”的逗号分隔字符串,而
我想使用 JSON 作为 mirth channel 的输入和输出,例如详细信息保存在数据库中或创建 HL7 消息。 简而言之,输入为 JSON 解析它并输出为任何格式。 最佳答案 var objec
通常我会使用 R 并执行 merge.by,但这个文件似乎太大了,部门中的任何一台计算机都无法处理它! (任何从事遗传学工作的人的附加信息)本质上,插补似乎删除了 snp ID 的 rs 数字,我只剩
我有一个以前可能被问过的问题,但我很难找到正确的描述。我希望有人能帮助我。 在下面的代码中,我设置了varprice,我想添加javascript变量accu_id以通过rails在我的数据库中查找记
我有一个简单的 SVG 文件,在 Firefox 中可以正常查看 - 它的一些包装文本使用 foreignObject 包含一些 HTML - 文本包装在 div 中:
所以我正在为学校编写一个 Ruby 程序,如果某个值是 1 或 3,则将 bool 值更改为 true,如果是 0 或 2,则更改为 false。由于我有 Java 背景,所以我认为这段代码应该有效:
我做了什么: 我在这些账户之间创建了 VPC 对等连接 互联网网关也连接到每个 VPC 还配置了路由表(以允许来自双方的流量) 情况1: 当这两个 VPC 在同一个账户中时,我成功测试了从另一个 La
我有一个名为 contacts 的表: user_id contact_id 10294 10295 10294 10293 10293 10294 102
我正在使用 Magento 中的新模板。为避免重复代码,我想为每个产品预览使用相同的子模板。 特别是我做了这样一个展示: $products = Mage::getModel('catalog/pro
“for”是否总是检查协议(protocol)中定义的每个函数中第一个参数的类型? 编辑(改写): 当协议(protocol)方法只有一个参数时,根据该单个参数的类型(直接或任意)找到实现。当协议(p
我想从我的 PHP 代码中调用 JavaScript 函数。我通过使用以下方法实现了这一点: echo ' drawChart($id); '; 这工作正常,但我想从我的 PHP 代码中获取数据,我使
这个问题已经有答案了: Event binding on dynamically created elements? (23 个回答) 已关闭 5 年前。 我有一个动态表单,我想在其中附加一些其他 h
我正在尝试找到一种解决方案,以在 componentDidMount 中的映射项上使用 setState。 我正在使用 GraphQL连同 Gatsby返回许多 data 项目,但要求在特定的 pat
我在 ScrollView 中有一个 View 。只要用户按住该 View ,我想每 80 毫秒调用一次方法。这是我已经实现的: final Runnable vibrate = new Runnab
我用 jni 开发了一个 android 应用程序。我在 GetStringUTFChars 的 dvmDecodeIndirectRef 中得到了一个 dvmabort。我只中止了一次。 为什么会这
当我到达我的 Activity 时,我调用 FragmentPagerAdapter 来处理我的不同选项卡。在我的一个选项卡中,我想显示一个 RecyclerView,但他从未出现过,有了断点,我看到
当我按下 Activity 中的按钮时,会弹出一个 DialogFragment。在对话框 fragment 中,有一个看起来像普通 ListView 的 RecyclerView。 我想要的行为是当
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!