gpt4 book ai didi

javascript - 用于 JavaScript .escape 函数的 Shim

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-04 01:56:37 25 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

根据此 mdn doc 全局 .escape() 函数:'...已从 Web 上删除。尽管某些浏览器可能仍然支持它,但它正在被删除......',正如弃用通知所说。我有一些工作代码严重依赖于可用的功能。查看 es5 escape(string) docs,我将这段代码放在一起,希望“让函数保持事件状态”,而不是重写我的工作代码。 问题是,当然,这个版本是在做与“即将被丢弃的.escape()函数”相同的事情吗?这是我想出的垫片:

//
// these 69 characters are left as is by native implementation
var safe69chars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789@*_+-./";

// equivalent hash map for speeding up character lookup
var chars69 = {0:1,1:1,2:1,3:1,4:1,5:1,6:1,7:1,8:1,9:1,A:1,B:1,C:1,D:1,E:1,F:1,G:1,H:1,I:1,J:1,K:1,L:1,M:1,N:1,O:1,P:1,Q:1,R:1,S:1,T:1,U:1,V:1,W:1,X:1,Y:1,Z:1,a:1,b:1,c:1,d:1,e:1,f:1,g:1,h:1,i:1,j:1,k:1,l:1,m:1,n:1,o:1,p:1,q:1,r:1,s:1,t:1,u:1,v:1,w:1,x:1,y:1,z:1,"@":1,"*":1,_:1,"+":1,"-":1,".":1,"/":1};

// these 'percent escapes' map to lower Array<int> list
// and their coresponding (funky) characters are processed by ecape function
var percesc = "%00%01%02%03%04%05%06%07%08%09%0A%0B%0C%0D%0E%0F%10%11%12%13%14%15%16%17%18%19%1A%1B%1C%1D%1E%1F%20%21%22%23%24%25%26%27%28%29%2C%3A%3B%3C%3D%3E%3F%5B%5C%5D%5E%60%7B%7C%7D%7E%7F%80%81%82%83%84%85%86%87%88%89%8A%8B%8C%8D%8E%8F%90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%9A%9B%9C%9D%9E%9F%A0%A1%A2%A3%A4%A5%A6%A7%A8%A9%AA%AB%AC%AD%AE%AF%B0%B1%B2%B3%B4%B5%B6%B7%B8%B9%BA%BB%BC%BD%BE%BF%C0%C1%C2%C3%C4%C5%C6%C7%C8%C9%CA%CB%CC%CD%CE%CF%D0%D1%D2%D3%D4%D5%D6%D7%D8%D9%DA%DB%DC%DD%DE%DF%E0%E1%E2%E3%E4%E5%E6%E7%E8%E9%EA%EB%EC%ED%EE%EF%F0%F1%F2%F3%F4%F5%F6%F7%F8%F9%FA%FB%FC%FD%FE%FF";
var ordesc = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255];

var isfunc = function (node) {
return "function" == typeof node;
};

var pad02;
var pad04;


// here check's if it has global .escape,
// if leaves 'safe69chars' characters unescaped,
// if correctly escapes other characters,
// and (re)defines the function if asserts don't pass
if (

!("escape" in window) ||
!isfunc(window.escape) ||
(safe69chars !== window.escape(safe69chars)) ||
(percesc !== window.escape(ordesc.map(function(c) {
return String.fromCharCode(c);
}).join("")))

) {

pad02 = function(c) {
//return Array(3).splice(c.length).join("0") + c;
return (Array(3).splice(c.length).join("0") + c).toUpperCase();
};

pad04 = function(c) {
//return Array(5).splice(c.length).join("0") + c;
return (Array(5).splice(c.length).join("0") + c).toUpperCase();
};

window.escape = function escape (str) {

str += '';

// loops each character
// escaping it if needed
for (
var
chr, chrcode, hexcode, i = -1,
len = str.length, escaped = "";
++i < len;
) {

chr = str.charAt(i);

// use hash lookup to speed up search a bit
if (chars69.hasOwnProperty(chr)) {

// if it's in chars69 append it
escaped += chr;

} else {

// get the character's code and it's hex value
chrcode = chr.charCodeAt(0);
hexcode = chrcode.toString(16);

if (chrcode < 256) {

// pad with '0', length 2 if less than 256 and append
escaped += ('%' + pad02(hexcode));

} else {

// pad with '0', length 4 otherwise and append
escaped += ('%u' + pad04(hexcode));

}

}

}

return escaped;
};

}
//?
//

最佳答案

@jfriend00,你说得对,我没想到要进行测试。它构建一个 2**16 (=65536) 字符串并在其上运行两个版本比较 (===) 输出。 native .escape() 实际上大写了十六进制字母(在上面的代码片段中遗漏了)。开始了:

//
//
var safe69chars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789@*_+-./";

var pad02 = function(c) {
return (Array(3).splice(c.length).join("0") + c).toUpperCase();
};

var pad04 = function(c) {
return (Array(5).splice(c.length).join("0") + c).toUpperCase();
};


function esc (str) {

str += '';

for (
var chr, chrcode, hexcode, i = -1,
len = str.length, escaped = "";
++i < len;
) {

chr = str.charAt(i);

if (-1 != safe69chars.indexOf(chr)) {
escaped += chr;
} else {

chrcode = chr.charCodeAt(0);
hexcode = chrcode.toString(16);

if (chrcode < 256) {
escaped += ('%' + pad02(hexcode));
} else {
escaped += ('%u' + pad04(hexcode));
}
}
}

return escaped;
}


var mkrange = function (len) {
return Array.prototype.map.call(
Array(len+1).join("1"),
function (one, i) {return i;}
)
};

var rng = mkrange(Math.pow(2, 16));

// builds 65536 character string
var str = rng.map(function (c) {return String.fromCharCode(c)}).join("");

// runs the test:
esc(str) === escape(str);
// true
//

关于javascript - 用于 JavaScript .escape 函数的 Shim,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23451966/

25 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com