open-source - 开源专家系统

Question

关闭。这个问题不满足Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。












想改善这个问题吗？更新问题，使其成为 on-topic对于堆栈溢出。

7年前关闭。




Improve this question




有谁知道开源专家系统？实际上，我对从 C# 调用它的推理引擎很感兴趣。

Answer 1

其他答案中已经提到了 CLIPS 和 JESS，因此我将提供 CLIPS 与 JESS 的链接:
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/~kristof/research/notes/clipsvsjess/

写于 1999 年 6 月 4 日，当时优势明显是 CLIPS。

如果您不想全部阅读，以下是结论:

Chapter 3 The conclusions

Both CLIPS and JESS are products with a large support on the internet, but CLIPS seems to have a broader audience, probably because it exists longer. This difference in age results in the CLIPS package being more stable and complete, while JESS users will still experience some minor bugs. JESS is constantly updated and the author, Ernest Friedman-Hill, has been very responsive to user/developer feedback and regularly puts out new releases and bug fixes.

Nowadays, the choice between JESS and CLIPS depends on the application. If it is web-based or should reside in applet-form, the choice of JESS is a very logical one (which is even supported by the authors of CLIPS). For the more classic applications, CLIPS will probably be chosen because of its reputation of being more stable and having more support.

The future of JESS depends highly on the evolution of the web, the Java programming language and its own future stability. These three conditions make that there is a great possibility that JESS will become more popular and more frequently used. Especially the object-oriented possibilities and the easy integration into Java code makes JESS’ future very promising.

CLIPS, on the other hand, is more likely to implement the new and sophisticated features first as they come out, since it still has the advantage in time. CLIPS has also various extensions and variants(like FuzzyCLIPS, AGENT CLIPS, DYNACLIPS, KnowExec, CAPE, PerlCLIPS, wxCLIPS and EHSIS to name a few) that give it an advantage with respect to support of methods like fuzzy logic and agents.

The multifunctional developing environment of CLIPS for operating systems that support windows is also an advantage, while JESS has just one window with two buttons (‘clear window’ and ‘quit’), without a menu. Figures 1 and 2 depict both environments.

To summarize, CLIPS is still more complete and stable than JESS, but this might change in the future, since the JESS package is being improved constantly. Besides that, JESS has also the property of using Java, which in the long run might prove to be a big advantage over CLIPS.

这些链接可能也很有趣:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLIPS

商业和免费软件专家系统 shell
http://www.kbsc.com/rulebase.html

Are there open source expert systems with reasoning capabilities?