gpt4 book ai didi

uml 与 RDF 和 OWL 的组合关系

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-04 00:38:44 25 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我是 RDF 和 OWL 本体的初学者。

我正在尝试将此图转换为 OWL 语法。

enter image description here

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<!-- OWL Class Definition - Robot Position -->
<owl:Class rdf:ID="house" />
<owl:Class rdf:ID="room" />
<owl:Class rdf:ID="kitchen" />
<owl:Class rdf:ID="garden" />
<owl:Class rdf:ID="table" />
<owl:Class rdf:ID="chair" />

<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="composedBy">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#house"/>
<rdfs:rang rdf:resource="#room" >
</owl:ObjectProperty>
</rdf:RDF>

我不知道如何使 composed by 关系多次使用。我正在考虑使用

来制作一个集合类型的范围

(house)---composedBy---(room, kitchen, garden)

但是,我想用同样的关系

(厨房)---comoposedBy---( table ,椅子)

验证器出错,因为我两次使用 composedBy 作为 ID。 (我现在删除了它)

我怎样才能正确翻译这张图。

:))

最佳答案

如果你想说房子必须有一个(或至少一个)厨房,必须有一个(或至少一个)房间,必须有一个(或至少一个)花园,那么 unionOf并没有真正解决这里的问题。与其担心组合属性的范围,我认为如果你有一个更通用的组件属性,并通过使用存在限制来表达必须保持的不同关系,可能会更有帮助。例如,你可以这样说

House ⊑ =1 hasPart.Kitchen
House ⊑ ≥2 hasPart.Room
House ⊑ ∃hasPart.Garden

表示一所房子只有一个厨房、至少两个房间和至少一个花园。类似地,你可以说有一张 table 和一把椅子

Kitchen ⊑ ∃hasPart.Chair
Kitchen ⊑ ∃hasPart.Table

在 Protégé 中,这看起来像:

house ontology, kitchen class with axioms

Turtle 和 RDF/XML 中的 RDF 序列化是:

@prefix :      <http://www.example.org/houses#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .

<http://www.example.org/houses>
a owl:Ontology .

:hasPart a owl:ObjectProperty .

:Table a owl:Class .
:Room a owl:Class .
:Garden a owl:Class .
:Chair a owl:Class .

:House a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:minQualifiedCardinality "2"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
owl:onClass :Room ;
owl:onProperty :hasPart
] ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :hasPart ;
owl:someValuesFrom :Garden
] ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:onClass :Kitchen ;
owl:onProperty :hasPart ;
owl:qualifiedCardinality "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger
] .


:Kitchen a owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :hasPart ;
owl:someValuesFrom :Table
] ;
rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
owl:onProperty :hasPart ;
owl:someValuesFrom :Chair
] .
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns="http://www.example.org/houses#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses"/>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Room"/>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#House">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#hasPart"/>
</owl:onProperty>
<owl:onClass rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#Room"/>
<owl:minQualifiedCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger"
>2</owl:minQualifiedCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#hasPart"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Garden"/>
</owl:someValuesFrom>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#hasPart"/>
<owl:onClass>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Kitchen"/>
</owl:onClass>
<owl:qualifiedCardinality rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger"
>1</owl:qualifiedCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Chair"/>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Table"/>
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.example.org/houses#Kitchen">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#hasPart"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#Table"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#hasPart"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/houses#Chair"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdf:RDF>

关于uml 与 RDF 和 OWL 的组合关系,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21920618/

25 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com