WPF Dispatcher 不像 BGWorker 那样工作

Question

我在一个 MVVM 应用程序中。在这里，我有一个集合(ObservableCollection)，它可能具有从不同线程完成的添加、删除操作。
这是代码。我试图让它尽可能完整:

private Thread _thread = null;
private Dispatcher _UIDispatcher = null;
public ObservableCollection<string> ListOfStrings { get; private set; }

Actor :

 public MainWindowViewModel(Dispatcher dispatcher)
 {
            this.ListOfStrings = new ObservableCollection<string>();
            this.StartAsyncCall = new RelayCommand(AsyncCall, CanCallAsynch);
            this._UIDispatcher = dispatcher;
 }

我将 View 的调度程序作为引用(虽然这不是一个好习惯，因为它使单元测试变得困难。Gary Hall 提出了一种使用 AOP 的好方法。不过我可以在以后随时更改它。)。然后我通过命令调用的这个方法

private void AsyncCall()
{
    if (this.ListOfStrings.Count > 0)
       this.ListOfStrings.Clear();
     //_backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
    this._thread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(AddNumbersToList));
    this._thread.IsBackground = true;
    this._thread.Start();
}
 private void AddNumbersToList()
 {
       Action delAddNum = new Action(AddNumbersToList);
       for (int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++)
       {
           if (null != this._UIDispatcher &&
            !this._UIDispatcher.CheckAccess())
                    _UIDispatcher.Invoke(DispatcherPriority.Render,delAddNum);
           else
           {
                    this.ListOfStrings.Add(Convert.ToString(i.ToString()));
           }
        }
  }

ObservableCollection 绑定(bind)到 View 中的列表框。

我预期的效果是，随着 ObservableCollection 添加了新数字，它们应该显示在 UI 中。用户界面也将是 nicley 响应式的。但奇怪的是用户界面没有响应。当我试图通过后台工作人员实现时，同样的事情也很好地实现了。有人可以指出我哪里出错了。我不想选择后台工作人员，因为我想要使用更细粒度的 Thread 类的灵 active 。
下面是我与 BGWorker 一起使用的代码，它运行良好:

    private BackgroundWorker _backgroundWorker = new BackgroundWorker();

CTOR:

public MainWindowViewModel()
{
     this.ListOfStrings = new ObservableCollection<string>();
     this.StartAsyncCall = new RelayCommand(AsyncCall, CanCallAsynch);
     _backgroundWorker.DoWork += AddNumbersToList;
     _backgroundWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += this.LoadResultsCompleted;
     _backgroundWorker.WorkerReportsProgress = true;
     _backgroundWorker.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(_backgroundWorker_ProgressChanged);
}

方法:

 private void AsyncCall()
 {
    if (this.ListOfStrings.Count > 0)
      this.ListOfStrings.Clear();
      this._backgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
 }

private void AddNumbersToList(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
      BackgroundWorker bw = sender as BackgroundWorker;
      if(null!=bw)
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
      {
           bw.ReportProgress(0, i);
                    Thread.Sleep(1000);
        }
 }


 private void LoadResultsCompleted(object sender, RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs e)
 {
   if (e.Error == null)
   {
            this.ListOfStrings.Add("Completed");
            CommandManager.InvalidateRequerySuggested();
   }
 }

//This works just wonderful:
void _backgroundWorker_ProgressChanged(object sender, ProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
    this.ListOfStrings.Add(Convert.ToString(e.UserState.ToString()));
}

先感谢您。

..詹姆士

Answer 1

它是挂起你的代码的递归......

这对我有用...

    private void AsyncCall()
    {
        if (this.MyCollection.Count > 0)
            this.MyCollection.Clear();

        this._thread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(AddNumbersToList));
        this._thread.IsBackground = true;

        this._thread.Start();
    }

    private void AddNumbersToList()
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++)
        {
            this.Dispatcher.Invoke(
                new Action(
                    delegate
                        {
                            this.MyCollection.Add(Convert.ToString(i.ToString()));
                        }));

            Thread.Sleep(100);
        }
    }