gpt4 book ai didi

unit-testing - 一个测试用例似乎干扰了另一测试用例

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-03 00:33:05 25 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

这是在 Rails 4.0.11 上。我正在使用 minitest 和 webmock 为与 API 交互的工作人员编写测试。我的测试文件中有两个测试用例(到目前为止)。当我运行这两个测试时,第二个测试(标题中带有“成功”的测试)失败。当我注释掉通过的测试(标题中带有“重试”的测试)时,失败的测试用例通过了。测试用例似乎互相干扰,但我不知道如何干扰。

(我在这些代码示例中混淆了公司 secret 数据。嗨,老板!)

这是测试:

require 'test_helper'

class FoocorpCheckStatusWorkerTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase

REQUEST_HEADERS = {'Accept'=>'*/*', 'Accept-Encoding'=>'gzip;q=1.0,deflate;q=0.6,identity;q=0.3', 'Content-Type'=>'text/xml', 'User-Agent'=>'Ruby'}
EXPECTED_BODY = "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<POSBizServices xmlns=\"http://api.foocorp.com\">\n <POSBizServiceHeader>\n <userId>ABC</userId>\n <password>abc123</password>\n <clientId>123</clientId>\n <action>CHECKSTATUS</action>\n <responseFormat>XML</responseFormat>\n </POSBizServiceHeader>\n <request>\n <checkStatus>\n <ecpdId>123</ecpdId>\n <refNum>12345678</refNum>\n </checkStatus>\n </request>\n</POSBizServices>\n"

def sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: '', line_level_status_code: '')

return <<-SAMPLE_RESPONSE_BODY
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<POSBizServices xmlns="http://api.foocorp.com">
<POSBizServiceHeader>
<userId>ABC</userId>
<password>abc123</password>
<clientId>123</clientId>
<statusCode>#{order_level_status_code}</statusCode>
<statusDescription>2015-01-29 14:03:07 [QA13:MS_WSQA4_ONEPOS_01:01] : Request Processed Successfully</statusDescription>
<action>CHECKSTATUS</action>
<responseFormat>XML</responseFormat>
</POSBizServiceHeader>
<response>
<statusResponse>
<count>1</count>
<orderStatus>
<orderId>12345678</orderId>
<orderDate>01/27/2015</orderDate>
<stats>1,0</stats>
<aceOrderNo></aceOrderNo>
<locationCode></locationCode>
<lineInfoList>
<count>1</count>
<lineStatus>
<lineSeq>1</lineSeq>
<statusCode>#{line_level_status_code}</statusCode>
<statusDesc>No Status Yet.</statusDesc>
</lineStatus>
</lineInfoList>
</orderStatus>
</statusResponse>
</response>
</POSBizServices>
SAMPLE_RESPONSE_BODY
end

test "retry codes leave activity processor step in waiting state and activity in auto_processing state" do

activity_processor_step = activity_processor_steps(:vip_vm_password_reset_step)
activity = activity_processor_step.activity

FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker::STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:retry].each do |status_code_pair|

stub_request(:post, FOOCORP_VIP_CONFIG[:base_url]).
with(:body => /^.*$/,
:headers => REQUEST_HEADERS
).
to_return(:status => 200, :body => sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: status_code_pair.first, line_level_status_code: status_code_pair.last), :headers => {})

FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker.new.perform

activity.reload
assert_equal("auto_processing", activity.state)

activity_processor_step.reload
assert_equal("waiting", activity_processor_step.state)

end
end

test "success codes complete activity and activity processor step" do

activity_processor_step = activity_processor_steps(:vip_vm_password_reset_step)
activity = activity_processor_step.activity

FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker::STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:success].each do |status_code_pair|

stub_request(:post, FOOCORP_VIP_CONFIG[:base_url]).
with(:body => /^.*$/,
:headers => REQUEST_HEADERS
).
to_return(:status => 200, :body => sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: status_code_pair.first, line_level_status_code: status_code_pair.last), :headers => {})

FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker.new.perform

activity.reload
assert_equal("completed", activity.state)

activity_processor_step.reload
assert_equal("completed", activity_processor_step.state)
end
end
end

这是 worker :

class FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker
@queue = :short_running

# Foocorp VIP returns an order-level status code and description
# and a line-level status code and description. The comments describing
# the status codes in STATUS_CODE_MATRIX are from Foocorp's Docs.
#
# Array format for status codes is:
# ["(order-level status code)", "(line-level status code)"]

STATUS_CODE_MATRIX = {
:success => [
["00057", "00051"] # Request Processed Successfully
],
:retry => [
["00057", "00053"], # No Status Yet
["00057", "00054"], # Order processed successfully but activation is pending.
["00099", ""], # Unexpected error occurred during processing e.g. null pointer exception which causes thread to terminate.
["00059", ""], # Server time out occurred.
["10009", ""], # Back End call returned invalid agent data.
["10010", ""], # Application fails to load ECPD profile details.
["00058", "10013"], # Backend calls fails to load Billing information for account. It may be due to some internal issue.
["00058", "10032"], # Exception occurred in Bulk Service write
["00058", "10033"], # Error occurred in Bulk Service write for reassign
["00058", "10040"], # Sub Account create failed
["00058", "10144"] # UNABLE TO RETRIEVE CREDIT INFORMATION
]
}

def perform

ActivityProcessorStep.where(state: "waiting").where("vip_ref_num IS NOT NULL").each do |activity_processor_step|

client = Remote::Clients::FoocorpVipClient.new(
:params => {
:ecpd_id => activity_processor_step.activity.carrier_account.parent_account.api_access_id,
:vip_ref_num => activity_processor_step.vip_ref_num
}
)
response = client.check_status
#TODO: Remove debugging code
#binding.pry
order_status_code = response.first[:order_status_code]
order_status_desc = response.first[:order_status_desc]
line_status_code = response.last[:line_status_code]
line_status_desc = response.last[:line_status_desc]

status_codes = [order_status_code, line_status_code]
response_message = line_status_desc.present? ? line_status_desc : order_status_desc
response_message ||= "No status description given"

success = STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:success].detect{ |codes_array| codes_array == [order_status_code, line_status_code]}.present?
retry_status_check = STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:retry].detect{ |codes_array| codes_array == [order_status_code, line_status_code]}.present?
stale_request = retry_status_check && Time.now > (activity_processor_step.created_at + activity_processor_step.days_to_expire.days)

if success
activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Complete', nil, nil, response_message)
elsif stale_request
activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Failure', nil, nil, "Activity processor step expired.")
elsif !retry_status_check
activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Failure', nil, nil, response_message)
end

end
end
end

这是我的终端输出:

运行两个测试用例:

me@domo-kun ~/my-project (feature_foocorp_check_status_worker=)$ be rake test TEST=test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb 
Run options: --seed 58882

# Running tests:

.F

Fabulous tests in 2.009658s, 0.9952 tests/s, 11.4447 assertions/s.

1) Failure:
FoocorpCheckStatusWorkerTest#test_success_codes_complete_activity_and_activity_processor_step [/Users/steven/Development/my-company/my_company/test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb:86]:
Expected: "completed"
Actual: "auto_processing"

2 tests, 23 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

注释掉第一个(“重试”)测试用例:

me@domo-kun ~/my-project (feature_foocorp_check_status_worker=)$ be rake test TEST=test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb 
Run options: --seed 14937

# Running tests:

.

Fabulous tests in 3.474386s, 0.2878 tests/s, 0.5756 assertions/s.

1 tests, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

当我一起运行两个测试并在工作线程中使用 binding.pry (此处注释掉)来检查“成功”测试用例期间 response 的值时(失败的),我得到以下两个结果。我期望在这两种情况下得到相同的结果(第二个)。

运行两个测试用例:

[1] pry(#<VerizonVipCheckStatusWorker>)> response
=> [{:order_status_code=>"00057",
:order_status_desc=>"",
:_summary=>{:order_status_code=>"00057", :order_status_desc=>""}},
{:line_status_code=>"00053",
:line_status_desc=>"No Status Yet.",
:_summary=>{}}]

注释掉第一个(“重试”)测试用例:

[2] pry(#<VerizonVipCheckStatusWorker>)> response
=> [{:order_status_code=>"00057",
:order_status_desc=>"",
:_summary=>{:order_status_code=>"00057", :order_status_desc=>""}},
{:line_status_code=>"00051",
:line_status_desc=>"No Status Yet.",
:_summary=>{}}]

最后一个示例中的响应值是我期望在“重试”测试用例的第一次迭代期间的值,而不是在“成功”情况下的值。

我尝试将设置方法中的内容移至您在此处看到的常量和 sample_response_body 方法中。我也尝试添加此拆卸方法,但没有帮助:

def teardown
WebMock.reset!
end

我正在从头开始编写工作程序和测试,因此完全有可能在某个地方出现愚蠢的语法/逻辑错误。我为这个可能过于冗长的问题表示歉意,但这确实让我抓狂。感谢您的帮助。谢谢。

最佳答案

事实证明,我正在适配器类中缓存我的响应,因此它忽略了 WebMock 提供的响应。

关于unit-testing - 一个测试用例似乎干扰了另一测试用例,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28307346/

25 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com