gpt4 book ai didi

sql - 为什么调用函数比直接执行函数代码要花更多的时间

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-02 22:24:46 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

在我的 SQL Server 2008 R2 数据库中,我有一个调用函数的查询。

最近这个查询开始执行得很慢。我发现用户定义的函数阻碍了所有查询。

我尝试单独执行此功能,需要 40 秒才能完成,而之前它执行时间为 3-4 秒。所以我尝试执行函数内部的代码并在这 3-4 秒内执行。

我不明白为什么执行函数代码比调用函数本身花费的时间少得多。我只在 SSMS 中尝试了所有这些。

这就是函数本身

ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[fn_SI_GetMark] (@AREA_ID int, @BD datetime, @ED datetime)  
RETURNS decimal(24, 2) AS
BEGIN



Declare @mon int;
set @Mon = 1;
if(DateDiff(day, @BD, @ED) > 40)
begin

declare @q1sb datetime; set @q1sb = Convert(datetime, '01.01.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q1eb datetime; set @q1eb = Convert(datetime, '01.04.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q2sb datetime; set @q2sb = Convert(datetime, '01.04.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q2eb datetime; set @q2eb = Convert(datetime, '01.07.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q3sb datetime; set @q3sb = Convert(datetime, '01.07.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q3eb datetime; set @q3eb = Convert(datetime, '01.10.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q4sb datetime; set @q4sb = Convert(datetime, '01.10.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD)));
declare @q4eb datetime; set @q4eb = Convert(datetime, '01.01.'+(Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@BD) + 1)));
if((@BD >= @q1sb) and (@BD < @q1eb))
begin
set @BD = @q1sb;
end
else if((@BD >= @q2sb) and (@BD < @q2eb))
begin
set @BD = @q2sb;
end
else if((@BD >= @q3sb) and (@BD < @q3eb))
begin
set @BD = @q3sb;
end
else if((@BD >= @q4sb) and (@BD < @q4eb))
begin
set @BD = @q4sb;
end



declare @q1se datetime; set @q1se = Convert(datetime, '01.01.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q1ee datetime; set @q1ee = Convert(datetime, '01.04.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q2se datetime; set @q2se = Convert(datetime, '01.04.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q2ee datetime; set @q2ee = Convert(datetime, '01.07.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q3se datetime; set @q3se = Convert(datetime, '01.07.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q3ee datetime; set @q3ee = Convert(datetime, '01.10.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q4se datetime; set @q4se = Convert(datetime, '01.10.'+Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED)));
declare @q4ee datetime; set @q4ee = Convert(datetime, '01.01.'+(Convert(nvarchar(4), Year(@ED) + 1)));
if((@ED >= @q1se) and (@ED <= @q1ee))
begin
set @ED = @q1ee;
end
else if((@ED >= @q2se) and (@ED <= @q2ee))
begin
set @ED = @q2ee;
end
else if((@ED >= @q3se) and (@ED <= @q3ee))
begin
set @ED = @q3ee;
end
else if((@ED >= @q4se) and (@ED <= @q4ee))
begin
set @ED = @q4ee;
end


set @Mon = datediff(month, @BD, @ED) / 3;

end


declare @i int;

DECLARE @Mark decimal(24, 2); SET @Mark = 0;
declare @count int; SET @count = 0;

DECLARE @AREA_PATH nvarchar(max), @SI_CheckListId int, @SI_CheckListTitle nvarchar(max), @SI_CheckListCreatedBy int;


DECLARE @Mark2 decimal(24, 2); set @Mark2 = 0;
declare @count2 int; SET @count2 = 0;



DECLARE @areaIdStr nvarchar(max);
set @areaIdStr = convert(nvarchar(max), @AREA_ID);


DECLARE db_cursor_rights2 CURSOR
for
SELECT tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListId
FROM tblArea INNER JOIN
tbl_SI_CheckList ON tblArea.AREA_ID = tbl_SI_CheckList.AreaId
WHERE ('%/'+tblArea.AREA_PATH+'/%' like '%/'+@areaIdStr+'/%')
and (((tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListIsDeleted <> 1) and (tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListDateCreated <= @ED))
or
((tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListIsDeleted = 1) and (tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListDateDeleted is not null) and (tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListDateDeleted >= @BD) and (tbl_SI_CheckList.SI_CheckListDateCreated <= @ED)))


OPEN db_cursor_rights2;
FETCH NEXT FROM db_cursor_rights2
INTO @SI_CheckListId;
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN


set @i = 1
while @i <= @Mon
begin
set @Mark2 = 0
set @count2 = 0

SELECT @Mark2 = @Mark2 + Mark
FROM tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr
WHERE (SI_CheckListId = @SI_CheckListId) and ((tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.DateCreated >= @BD) and (tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.DateCreated < @ED) and (tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.IsDeleted <> 1))

if(@Mark2 is not null)
begin
set @Mark = @Mark + @Mark2;
end
set @i = @i + 1;

SELECT @count2 = count(Mark)
FROM tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr
WHERE (SI_CheckListId = @SI_CheckListId) and ((tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.DateCreated >= @BD) and (tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.DateCreated < @ED) and (tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr.IsDeleted <> 1))

if(@count2 = 0)
begin
set @count2 = @count2 + 1;
end

set @count = @count + @count2;

end

FETCH NEXT FROM db_cursor_rights2
INTO @SI_CheckListId;

END
CLOSE db_cursor_rights2;
DEALLOCATE db_cursor_rights2;

if(@count = 0)
begin
set @count = 1;
end

set @Mark = round(@Mark/@count, 2)

RETURN (@Mark)


END

这就是我尝试调用它的方式

DECLARE @AREA_ID int; SET @AREA_ID=1;
DECLARE @BD datetime, @ED datetime;
SET @BD=cast('2012-10-01' AS DATETIME);
SET @ED=cast('2012-11-01' AS DATETIME);
DECLARE @MArk decimal(24,2);
set @Mark = (select dbo.fn_SI_GetMark(@AREA_ID, @BD, @ED));
PRINT @Mark

另外一件事,我试图在另一个数据库服务器上执行这个函数(在这两个服务器之间设置了复制)并且它执行得非常快。另一个观察如果我调用不带参数的函数,直接在函数中设置它们,它也执行得很快。

最佳答案

可能是旧的统计数据。尝试更新

UPDATE STATISTICS tbl_SI_CheckListRegistr
UPDATE STATISTICS tblArea
UPDATE STATISTICS tbl_SI_CheckList

关于sql - 为什么调用函数比直接执行函数代码要花更多的时间,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13135069/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com