javascript - typescript rxjs : is there any clean alternative to setimeout 0

Question

在我的 Angular 应用程序中，我正在使用这种处理方法

myMethod(){
 ...
 setTimeout(() => {
      this.router.navigate(['mucomponent']);
 });
}

正如我被告知的:setTimeout 没有延迟 (0) 似乎等待下一个刻度，所有治疗完成后开始我的治疗。这是近期的计划。

因为我需要这种行为

是否有任何干净的替代方法可以与 typescript 或 rxjs 做同样的事情，以做得更好？

建议？

Answer 1

尽管接受的答案在技术上可能可行，但它远非理想。 RxJS 团队正是为此用例创建了 asapScheduler。

asapScheduler.schedule(() => this.router.navigate(['mucomponent']));

来自RxJS docs :

asap scheduler will do its best to minimize time between end of currently executing code and start of scheduled task. This makes it best candidate for performing so called "deferring". Traditionally this was achieved by calling setTimeout(deferredTask, 0), but that technique involves some (although minimal) unwanted delay.