gpt4 book ai didi

sql - 使用 TOP 和 ESCAPE 更改查询计划和执行时间

转载 作者:行者123 更新时间:2023-12-02 21:06:15 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

其中一个查询(如下所示)的执行时间超过 90 秒。它从相当大的 LogMessage 表中返回约 500 行。如果从查询中删除 ESCAPE N'~',它将在几秒钟内执行。同样,如果TOP (1000)被删除,它会在几秒钟内执行。在第一种情况下,查询计划显示了Key Lookup (Clustered) PK_LogMessage、Index Scan (NonClustered) IX_LogMessage 和 Nested Loops (Inner Join)。删除子句 ESCAPE N'~'TOP (1000) 后,查询计划会更改并显示聚集索引扫描(聚集)PK_LogMessage。当我们考虑添加更多索引(可能在 ApplicationName 上)时,我们想了解当前发生的情况。

查询是从 Entity Framework 生成的,以防您想知道为什么要这样编写。此外,实际查询更为复杂,但这是表现出相同行为的最短版本。

查询:

SELECT TOP (1000) 
[Project1].[MessageID] AS [MessageID],
[Project1].[TimeGenerated] AS [TimeGenerated],
[Project1].[SystemName] AS [SystemName],
[Project1].[ApplicationName] AS [ApplicationName]
FROM
(
SELECT
[Project1].[MessageID] AS [MessageID],
[Project1].[TimeGenerated] AS [TimeGenerated],
[Project1].[SystemName] AS [SystemName],
[Project1].[ApplicationName] AS [ApplicationName]
FROM
(
SELECT
[Extent1].[MessageID] AS [MessageID],
[Extent1].[TimeGenerated] AS [TimeGenerated],
[Extent1].[SystemName] AS [SystemName],
[Extent1].[ApplicationName] AS [ApplicationName]
FROM
[dbo].[LogMessage] AS [Extent1]
INNER JOIN
[dbo].[LogMessageCategory] AS [Extent2]
ON
[Extent1].[CategoryID] = [Extent2].[CategoryID]
WHERE
([Extent1].[ApplicationName] LIKE N'%tier%' ESCAPE N'~')
) AS [Project1]
) AS [Project1]
ORDER BY
[Project1].[TimeGenerated] DESC

表日志消息:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LogMessage](
[MessageID] [int] IDENTITY(1000001,1) NOT NULL,
[TimeGenerated] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[SystemName] [nvarchar](256) NOT NULL,
[ApplicationName] [nvarchar](512) NOT NULL,
[CategoryID] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LogMessage] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[MessageID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,
ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 90) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]

ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LogMessage] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_LogMessage_LogMessageCategory] FOREIGN KEY([CategoryID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[LogMessageCategory] ([CategoryID])

ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LogMessage] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_LogMessage_LogMessageCategory]

ALTER TABLE [dbo].[LogMessage] ADD DEFAULT ((100)) FOR [CategoryID]

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_LogMessage] ON [dbo].[LogMessage]
(
[TimeGenerated] DESC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF,
IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON,
ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 90) ON [PRIMARY]

表日志消息类别:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[LogMessageCategory](
[CategoryID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [nvarchar](128) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](256) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_LogMessageCategory] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[CategoryID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]

查询计划 1(需要 90 秒以上)

Query Plan 1 (takes 90+ seconds)

查询计划 2(大约需要 3 秒)

Query Plan 2 (takes ~3 seconds)

最佳答案

对我来说,这看起来像是一个直接的参数嗅探问题。

如果您想要按 TimeGeneerated 排序的 TOP 1000,SQL Server 可以扫描 TimeGenerate 上的索引并针对基表进行查找评估 ApplicationName 上的谓词,并在找到第 1,000 行时停止,或者它可以执行聚集索引扫描,查找与 ApplicationName 谓词匹配的所有行,然后执行 TOP N 就是这些。

SQL Server 维护字符串列的统计信息。如果第一个计划认为许多行最终将与 ApplicationName 谓词匹配,则更有可能选择第一个计划,但是该计划并不真正适合作为参数化查询重复使用,因为它可能会造成灾难性的后果如果很少有行匹配,效率就会很低。如果匹配项少于 1,000 个,则肯定需要执行与表中行数一样多的键查找。

通过这方面的测试,我没有发现添加或删除冗余 ESCAPE 会改变 SQL Server 基数估计的任何情况。当然,更改参数化查询的文本意味着原始计划无法使用,并且需要编译一个不同的计划,该计划可能更适合当前考虑的特定值。

关于sql - 使用 TOP 和 ESCAPE 更改查询计划和执行时间,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6333627/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com