- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我正在使用 libusb 与配置为 USB 设备的飞利浦 ISP1362 进行通信。我能够使用同步 I/O 成功环回数据,没有任何问题。由于某种原因,在使用异步 I/O 时似乎存在竞争条件。
我正在使用背靠背 OUT-IN 传输来传输 64 字节数据包。有时,当我运行我的程序时,libusb 会抛出超时错误并且一些环回数据会丢失。在使用我的 Beagle 12 分析 USB 总线时,我可以看到 OUT-IN 事务在应该是(OUT-IN-OUT-IN)时出现了乱序(即 OUT-OUT-IN-TIMEOUT)。
更新 传输在回调函数中出现乱序,这很奇怪,因为它们与总线分析器上的实际情况不一致。
示例 1:(进-出-进-出)
main(): submitting transfer 0, endpoint 1
main(): submitting transfer 1, endpoint 82
main(): submitting transfer 2, endpoint 1
main(): submitting transfer 3, endpoint 82
xfr_cb(): count 0, status = 0, endpoint = 82, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 1, status = 0, endpoint = 1, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 2, status = 0, endpoint = 82, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 3, status = 0, endpoint = 1, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
completed
示例 2:(出-入-出)
main(): submitting transfer 0, endpoint 1
main(): submitting transfer 1, endpoint 82
main(): submitting transfer 2, endpoint 1
main(): submitting transfer 3, endpoint 82
xfr_cb(): count 0, status = 0, endpoint = 1, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 1, status = 0, endpoint = 82, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 2, status = 0, endpoint = 82, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
xfr_cb(): count 3, status = 0, endpoint = 1, actual_length = 64, completed = 0
completed
下面是分析器的截图:
代码如下:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <libusb-1.0/libusb.h>
/* Specify VENDOR_ID and PRODUCT_ID for device */
#define VENDOR_ID 0x0471
#define PRODUCT_ID 0x3630
/* Define number of bytes to transfer */
#define EP_SIZE 64 // bytes
#define TRANSFERS 4 // number of transfers
#define BYTES EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS
#define TIMEOUT 3*1000 // milliseconds
/* Use a global variable to keep the device handle */
static struct libusb_device_handle *devh = NULL;
/* use a global variable to keep the context */
static struct libusb_context *usb_context = NULL;
/* count variable */
int count = 0;
/* The Endpoint addresses are hard-coded. You should use libusb -v to find
* the values corresponding to device
*/
static int ep_in = 0x82;
static int ep_out = 0x01;
void xfr_cb(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
int *completed = transfer->user_data;
/* callback - This is called after the transfer has been received by libusb */
fprintf(stderr, "xfr_cb(): count %d, status = %d, endpoint = %x, actual_length = %d, completed = %d\n",
count,
transfer->status,
transfer->endpoint,
transfer->actual_length,
*completed);
if (transfer->status != LIBUSB_TRANSFER_COMPLETED)
{
/* Error! */
fprintf(stderr, "Error: %s\n", libusb_error_name((int)transfer->status));
}
if (count == TRANSFERS-1)
*completed = 1;
count++;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int ep_addr;
int completed = 0;
unsigned char *buf;
size_t length = 64;
int n;
int i;
int rc;
/* Initialize libusb */
rc = libusb_init(NULL);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error Initializing libusb: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
exit(1);
}
/* Set debugging output to max level */
libusb_set_debug(NULL, 3);
/* Look for a specific device and open it */
devh = libusb_open_device_with_vid_pid(NULL, VENDOR_ID, PRODUCT_ID);
if (!devh)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error finding USB device\n");
goto out;
}
/* allocate memory */
buf = malloc(length);
/* start with OUT transfer */
ep_addr = ep_out;
/* queue up alternating OUT-IN transfers */
for (i = 0; i < TRANSFERS; i++)
{
/* fill the buffer with incrementing data */
for (n = 0; n < EP_SIZE; n++)
{
buf[n] = i+n;
}
/* Set up the transfer object */
struct libusb_transfer *transfer;
transfer = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer, devh, ep_addr, buf, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, &completed, TIMEOUT); /* callback data = &completed */
/* Submit the transfer object */
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
fprintf(stderr, "main(): submitting transfer %d, endpoint %x\n", i, ep_addr);
/* alternate writing and reading for loopback */
ep_addr = (ep_addr == ep_out) ? ep_in : ep_out;
}
/* Handle Events */
while (!completed)
{
rc = libusb_handle_events_completed(NULL, &completed);
if (rc < 0)
{
if (rc == LIBUSB_ERROR_INTERRUPTED)
continue;
fprintf(stderr, "Transfer Error: %s", libusb_error_name(rc));
continue;
}
}
fprintf(stderr, "completed\n");
/* Release the interface */
libusb_release_interface(devh, 0);
/* Close the device handle */
if (devh)
libusb_close(devh);
out:
if (devh)
{
libusb_close(devh);
}
libusb_exit(NULL);
return rc;
}
更新 2 我成功消除了超时。 libusb 超时的原因是主机在总线上间歇性地发送两个连续的 OUT 事务。
分析器截图:
以下是工作代码(无超时)。毫无问题地运行了数千次
static void LIBUSB_CALL xfr_cb(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
int *completed = transfer->user_data;
unsigned char *wbuf, *rbuf;
size_t length = 64;
fprintf(stderr, "xfr_cb(): status = %d, endpoint = %x, actual_length = %d\n",
transfer->status,
transfer->endpoint,
transfer->actual_length);
*completed = 1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
const struct libusb_version *version;
int ep_addr;
int completed = 0;
unsigned char *buf, *wbuf1, *wbuf2, *rbuf1, *rbuf2;
size_t length = 64;
int n;
int m;
int i;
int rc;
/* Get libusb version */
version = libusb_get_version();
fprintf(stderr, "libusb version: %d.%d.%d.%d\n", version->major, version->minor, version->micro, version->nano);
/* Initialize libusb */
rc = libusb_init(NULL);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error Initializing libusb: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
exit(1);
}
/* Set debugging output to max level */
libusb_set_debug(NULL, 3);
/* Look for a specific device and open it */
handle = libusb_open_device_with_vid_pid(NULL, VENDOR_ID, PRODUCT_ID);
if (!handle)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error finding USB device\n");
goto out;
}
/* claim interface */
rc = libusb_claim_interface(handle, 0);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error claiming interface.\n");
goto out;
}
/* allocate memory */
wbuf1 = malloc(length);
wbuf2 = malloc(length);
rbuf1 = malloc(length);
rbuf2 = malloc(length);
/* fill the buffer with incrementing data */
for (n = 0; n < EP_SIZE; n++)
wbuf1[n] = n;
for (m = 0; m < EP_SIZE; m++)
wbuf2[m] = m+1;
struct libusb_transfer *transfer1;
struct libusb_transfer *transfer2;
struct libusb_transfer *transfer3;
struct libusb_transfer *transfer4;
/* Set up the transfer object */
transfer1 = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
transfer2 = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
transfer3 = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
transfer4 = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer1, handle, ep_out, wbuf1, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer2, handle, ep_in, rbuf1, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer3, handle, ep_out, wbuf2, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer4, handle, ep_in, rbuf2, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, &completed, TIMEOUT); /* callback data = &completed */
/* Submit the transfers */
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer1);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer2);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer3);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer4);
/* Handle Events */
while (!completed)
{
rc = libusb_handle_events_completed(NULL, &completed);
if (rc != LIBUSB_SUCCESS)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Transfer Error: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
break;
}
}
fprintf(stderr, "completed\n");
//* Release the interface */
libusb_release_interface(handle, 0);
/* Close the device handle */
if (handle)
libusb_close(handle);
out:
if (handle)
{
libusb_close(handle);
}
libusb_exit(NULL);
return rc;
}
如下更改代码(即 callback = NULL for transfer 1-3)重新创建间歇性重复事务,如屏幕截图所示。
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer1, handle, ep_out, wbuf1, EP_SIZE, NULL, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer2, handle, ep_in, rbuf1, EP_SIZE, NULL, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer3, handle, ep_out, wbuf2, EP_SIZE, NULL, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer4, handle, ep_in, rbuf2, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb, &completed, TIMEOUT); /* callback data = &completed */
老实说,根据他们的文档和示例,我不明白为什么循环会导致竞争条件。在 libusb 示例 (sam3u_benchmark.c) 之一中实际上建议对多个传输进行排队,并且还在以下 .pdf 中演示(使用循环)。
查看异步 I/O 部分:
https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/sites/default/files/presentations/scale_2017_usb.pdf http://www.signal11.us/oss/elc2014/elc_2014_usb_0.pdf
根据我的理解,使用 libusb_handle_events_completed(NULL, &completed) 应该可以解决同步问题。我误会了什么吗?从多线程中查看libusb_handle_events() http://libusb.sourceforge.net/api-1.0/libusb_mtasync.html
-“这就是为什么 libusb-1.0.9 引入了新的 libusb_handle_events_timeout_completed() 和 libusb_handle_events_completed() 函数,它们在获得锁后为您完成完成检查:”
他们需要的是在这种情况下如何使用他们的 API 的清晰示例。
我可以添加更多事件检查,但这里似乎有些不对。
更新 3:查看已接受的答案。
最佳答案
我开始阅读 libusb 源代码中的文档并了解发生了什么。
特别是关于 libusb 如何处理数据包大小的部分: http://libusb.sourceforge.net/api-1.0/libusb_packetoverflow.html
阅读后我很受用,我发现了两种使用异步 I/O 完成大数据环回测试的方法。
第一种方式是连续提交两次传输,传输->缓冲区包含整个数据结构(即发送和接收的总字节数)。第二种方式是使用包含 wMaxPacketSize(例如 64 字节)的 transfer->buffer 提交两个传输,并让 out 和 in 回调函数提交额外的传输以收发其余数据。
对于第二种情况,需要添加额外的代码来跟踪传输次数并在完成时设置完成信号。 OUT-IN 数据包交错由 libusb 和操作系统处理——这是我没有意识到的部分。换句话说,并非每个 OUT-IN 传输都需要单独指定和排队。
这是异步代码以及到我的 USB 设备 (ISP1362) 的传输速率。我的 USB 设备 Controller 是用纯 SystemVerilog 编码的 FPGA。
注意:关于传输速率,我只在 BULK_EP_IN 上启用了双缓冲。我假设如果在 BULK_EP_OUT 上启用双缓冲,IN-NAK (# POLL) 和传输速率将在第二种方法中提高。因此,由于设备配置的原因,这可能不是一个公平的比较。
第一种方法:~1.161 MB/s(~9.288 Mb/s)
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include </usr/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h>
/* Specify VENDOR_ID and PRODUCT_ID for device */
#define VENDOR_ID 0x0471
#define PRODUCT_ID 0x3630
/* Define number of bytes to transfer */
#define EP_SIZE 64 // bytes
#define TRANSFERS 1024*768*3/EP_SIZE // number of transfers
#define TIMEOUT 10*1000 // milliseconds
/* Use a global variable to keep the device handle */
static struct libusb_device_handle *handle = NULL;
/* count variables */
unsigned int count = 0;
unsigned int count_in = 0;
unsigned int count_out = 0;
/* The Endpoint addresses are hard-coded. You should use libusb -v to find
* the values corresponding to device
*/
static int ep_in = 0x82;
static int ep_out = 0x01;
/* Write and Read buffers */
unsigned char wbuf[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
unsigned char wbuf_tmp[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
unsigned char rbuf[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
unsigned char rbuf_tmp[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
static void LIBUSB_CALL xfr_cb_out(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
memcpy(wbuf+count_out*EP_SIZE, transfer->buffer, EP_SIZE);
}
static void LIBUSB_CALL xfr_cb_in(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
int *completed = transfer->user_data;
memcpy(rbuf+count_in*EP_SIZE, transfer->buffer, EP_SIZE);
count_in++; // one transfer complete
if (count_in < TRANSFERS)
*completed = 1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
const struct libusb_version *version;
int completed = 0;
size_t length = 64;
int n;
int m;
int rc;
/* Get libusb version */
version = libusb_get_version();
fprintf(stderr, "libusb version: %d.%d.%d.%d\n", version->major, version->minor, version->micro, version->nano);
/* Initialize libusb */
rc = libusb_init(NULL);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error Initializing libusb: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
exit(1);
}
/* Set debugging output to max level */
libusb_set_debug(NULL, 3);
/* Look for a specific device and open it */
handle = libusb_open_device_with_vid_pid(NULL, VENDOR_ID, PRODUCT_ID);
if (!handle)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error finding USB device\n");
goto out;
}
/* claim interface */
rc = libusb_claim_interface(handle, 0);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error claiming interface.\n");
goto out;
}
/* fill the buffer with incrementing data */
for (n = 0; n < TRANSFERS; n++)
{
for (m = 0; m < EP_SIZE; m++)
{
wbuf_tmp[m+n*EP_SIZE] = m+n;
}
}
struct libusb_transfer *transfer;
transfer = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer, handle, ep_out, wbuf_tmp, EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS, xfr_cb_out, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
transfer = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer, handle, ep_in, rbuf_tmp, EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS, xfr_cb_in, &completed, TIMEOUT);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
/* Handle Events */
while (!completed)
{
rc = libusb_handle_events_completed(NULL, &completed);
if (rc != LIBUSB_SUCCESS)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Transfer Error: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
break;
}
}
fprintf(stderr, "completed\n");
int res;
res = memcmp(rbuf, wbuf, sizeof(wbuf));
if (res != 0)
fprintf(stderr, "miscompare\n");
else
fprintf(stderr, "success\n");
//* Release the interface */
libusb_release_interface(handle, 0);
/* Close the device handle */
if (handle)
libusb_close(handle);
out:
if (handle)
{
libusb_close(handle);
}
libusb_exit(NULL);
return rc;
}
第二种方法:~755.9 MB/s(~6.047 Mb/s)
include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include </usr/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h>
/* Specify VENDOR_ID and PRODUCT_ID for device */
#define VENDOR_ID 0x0471
#define PRODUCT_ID 0x3630
/* Define number of bytes to transfer */
#define EP_SIZE 64 // bytes
#define TRANSFERS 1024*768*3/EP_SIZE // number of transfers
#define TIMEOUT 10*1000 // milliseconds
/* Use a global variable to keep the device handle */
static struct libusb_device_handle *handle = NULL;
/* count variables */
unsigned int count = 0;
unsigned int count_in = 0;
unsigned int count_out = 0;
/* The Endpoint addresses are hard-coded. You should use libusb -v to find
* the values corresponding to device
*/
static int ep_in = 0x82;
static int ep_out = 0x01;
/* Write and Read buffers */
unsigned char wbuf[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
unsigned char *wbuf_tmp;
unsigned char rbuf[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
unsigned char rbuf_tmp[EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS];
static void LIBUSB_CALL xfr_cb_out(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
memcpy(wbuf+count_out*EP_SIZE, transfer->buffer, EP_SIZE);
count_out++; // one transfer complete
if (count_out < TRANSFERS)
{
transfer->buffer = ++wbuf_tmp;
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
}
}
static void LIBUSB_CALL xfr_cb_in(struct libusb_transfer *transfer )
{
int *completed = transfer->user_data;
memcpy(rbuf+count_in*EP_SIZE, transfer->buffer, EP_SIZE);
count_in++; // one transfer complete
if (count_in < TRANSFERS)
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
else
*completed = 1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
const struct libusb_version *version;
int completed = 0;
size_t length = 64;
int n;
int rc;
/* Get libusb version */
version = libusb_get_version();
fprintf(stderr, "libusb version: %d.%d.%d.%d\n", version->major, version->minor, version->micro, version->nano);
/* Initialize libusb */
rc = libusb_init(NULL);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error Initializing libusb: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
exit(1);
}
/* Set debugging output to max level */
libusb_set_debug(NULL, 3);
/* Look for a specific device and open it */
handle = libusb_open_device_with_vid_pid(NULL, VENDOR_ID, PRODUCT_ID);
if (!handle)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error finding USB device\n");
goto out;
}
/* claim interface */
rc = libusb_claim_interface(handle, 0);
if (rc < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error claiming interface.\n");
goto out;
}
/* allocate memory */
wbuf_tmp = malloc(length*TRANSFERS);
/* fill the buffer with incrementing data */
for (n = 0; n < EP_SIZE*TRANSFERS; n++)
{
wbuf_tmp[n] = n;
}
struct libusb_transfer *transfer;
transfer = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer, handle, ep_out, wbuf_tmp, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb_out, NULL, TIMEOUT);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
transfer = libusb_alloc_transfer(0);
libusb_fill_bulk_transfer(transfer, handle, ep_in, rbuf_tmp, EP_SIZE, xfr_cb_in, &completed, TIMEOUT);
libusb_submit_transfer(transfer);
/* Handle Events */
while (!completed)
{
rc = libusb_handle_events_completed(NULL, &completed);
if (rc != LIBUSB_SUCCESS)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Transfer Error: %s\n", libusb_error_name(rc));
break;
}
}
fprintf(stderr, "completed\n");
int res;
res = memcmp(rbuf, wbuf, sizeof(wbuf));
if (res != 0)
fprintf(stderr, "miscompare\n");
else
fprintf(stderr, "success\n");
//* Release the interface */
libusb_release_interface(handle, 0);
/* Close the device handle */
if (handle)
libusb_close(handle);
out:
if (handle)
{
libusb_close(handle);
}
libusb_exit(NULL);
return rc;
}
关于c - 使用异步 I/O 的 Libusb 竞争条件,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49605169/
#include using namespace std; class C{ private: int value; public: C(){ value = 0;
这个问题已经有答案了: What is the difference between char a[] = ?string?; and char *p = ?string?;? (8 个回答) 已关闭
关闭。此题需要details or clarity 。目前不接受答案。 想要改进这个问题吗?通过 editing this post 添加详细信息并澄清问题. 已关闭 7 年前。 此帖子已于 8 个月
除了调试之外,是否有任何针对 c、c++ 或 c# 的测试工具,其工作原理类似于将独立函数复制粘贴到某个文本框,然后在其他文本框中输入参数? 最佳答案 也许您会考虑单元测试。我推荐你谷歌测试和谷歌模拟
我想在第二台显示器中移动一个窗口 (HWND)。问题是我尝试了很多方法,例如将分辨率加倍或输入负值,但它永远无法将窗口放在我的第二台显示器上。 关于如何在 C/C++/c# 中执行此操作的任何线索 最
我正在寻找 C/C++/C## 中不同类型 DES 的现有实现。我的运行平台是Windows XP/Vista/7。 我正在尝试编写一个 C# 程序,它将使用 DES 算法进行加密和解密。我需要一些实
很难说出这里要问什么。这个问题模棱两可、含糊不清、不完整、过于宽泛或夸夸其谈,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开,visit the help center . 关闭 1
有没有办法强制将另一个 窗口置于顶部? 不是应用程序的窗口,而是另一个已经在系统上运行的窗口。 (Windows, C/C++/C#) 最佳答案 SetWindowPos(that_window_ha
假设您可以在 C/C++ 或 Csharp 之间做出选择,并且您打算在 Windows 和 Linux 服务器上运行同一服务器的多个实例,那么构建套接字服务器应用程序的最明智选择是什么? 最佳答案 如
你们能告诉我它们之间的区别吗? 顺便问一下,有什么叫C++库或C库的吗? 最佳答案 C++ 标准库 和 C 标准库 是 C++ 和 C 标准定义的库,提供给 C++ 和 C 程序使用。那是那些词的共同
下面的测试代码,我将输出信息放在注释中。我使用的是 gcc 4.8.5 和 Centos 7.2。 #include #include class C { public:
很难说出这里问的是什么。这个问题是含糊的、模糊的、不完整的、过于宽泛的或修辞性的,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开它,visit the help center 。 已关
我的客户将使用名为 annoucement 的结构/类与客户通信。我想我会用 C++ 编写服务器。会有很多不同的类继承annoucement。我的问题是通过网络将这些类发送给客户端 我想也许我应该使用
我在 C# 中有以下函数: public Matrix ConcatDescriptors(IList> descriptors) { int cols = descriptors[0].Co
我有一个项目要编写一个函数来对某些数据执行某些操作。我可以用 C/C++ 编写代码,但我不想与雇主共享该函数的代码。相反,我只想让他有权在他自己的代码中调用该函数。是否可以?我想到了这两种方法 - 在
我使用的是编写糟糕的第 3 方 (C/C++) Api。我从托管代码(C++/CLI)中使用它。有时会出现“访问冲突错误”。这使整个应用程序崩溃。我知道我无法处理这些错误[如果指针访问非法内存位置等,
关闭。这个问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。 我们不允许提问寻求书籍、工具、软件库等的推荐。您可以编辑问题,以便用事实和引用来回答。 关闭 7 年前。
已关闭。此问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines 。目前不接受答案。 要求我们推荐或查找工具、库或最喜欢的场外资源的问题对于 Stack Overflow 来说是偏离主题的,因为
我有一些 C 代码,将使用 P/Invoke 从 C# 调用。我正在尝试为这个 C 函数定义一个 C# 等效项。 SomeData* DoSomething(); struct SomeData {
这个问题已经有答案了: Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? (14 个回答) 已关闭 6
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!