license-key - IntelliLock 与 Net Reactor

Question

这两者之间有什么区别？为什么我想要其中之一或两者？这是针对将通过 WiX 打包的商业 .NET C# WPF 应用程序。我需要试用许可证才能购买许可证功能。

Answer 1

我遇到了同样的问题，并且很幸运他们的 Eziriz 首席技术官回复了:

You only need one product. .NET Reactor is 100% concentrated on protection without making a compromise to the licensing system. On the other side IntelliLock is 100% concentrated on licensing and the corresponding protection functionality is optimized for the licensing system. That is the reason why IntelliLock can even provide licensing support for Linux (Mono) or the Compact Framework or offer full license management support via an ASP.NET interface. The protection of IntelliLock is not as strong as the one from .NET Reactor but the differences could be kept within a limit. IntelliLock can provide Obfuscation/Control Flow Obfuscation/Inject Invalid MetaData and String Encryption even without a restriction.

A significant difference between both products is the 100% managed solution of IntelliLock. The managed nature of IntelliLock allows you to create assemblies which are still cross-platform compatible and use of very flexible and advanced licensing features. IntelliLock takes all advantages the .NET Framework do offer. Therefore it is often used to protect component libraries. In case you want to have the extra bit of ultimate protection .NET Reactor should be the first choice. In contrast to IntelliLock, .NET Reactor injects native protection code. Therefore it is a question of preference which tool to choose to protect your .NET assemblies. :)

简单来说，.NET Reactor 和 Intellilocks 做的事情或多或少是相同的，与 .NET Reactor 相比，.NET Reactor 在保护算法上更强，而 Intellilocks 具有更简单的 GUI，但保护强度较弱。

我都尝试过。我建议使用 .NET Reactor；虽然不像 Intellilocks 那样用户友好，但 .NET Reactor 可以完成 Intellilocks 可以做的所有事情，并且具有更强大的保护。