symfony1 - 交响乐团 : customizing sfDoctrineGuardPlugin modules

Question

我正在尝试自定义 sfGuardUser 模块的形式。安装 sfGuardDoctrinePlugin 后，我遵循 Symfony 的级联配置约定并创建了以下结构:

apps/backend/modules/sfGuardUser
apps/backend/modules/sfGuardUser/config
apps/backend/modules/sfGuardUser/config/generator.yml

在 generator.yml 文件中，我尝试按照中的建议覆盖默认插件设置 this related question还有这个post in the official blog :

generator:  class: sfDoctrineGenerator  param:    config:      fields:        first_name:          label: Name        last_name:          label: Surname        email_address:          label: Email        updated_at:          label: Last update          date_format: f      list:        title: People        display: [=username, name, email_address, last_login]        sort: [username, asc]      filter:        display: [username, first_name, last_name, email_address]      edit:        title: Edit "%%name%%"      new:        title: Add a new user      form:        display:          "User":                   [first_name, last_name, email_address, username, password, password_again]          "Permissions and groups": [is_active, is_super_admin, groups_list]

However the form still reflects the default settings. For instance, it's still displaying the permissions_list.

Moreover, if you try to unset the widgets by overriding the sfGuardUserAdminForm you realize that it does not work either.

How can I avoid that and force a real overriding? Am I missing something?

Thanks!

UPDATE 1I have found a workaround, which is assigning a false value to the group, and then set a new group with the fields I wanted:

"User":  [first_name, last_name, email_address, username, password, password_again]
"Permissions and groups":  false
"Status and groups":  [is_active, is_super_admin, groups_list]

更新2这是documented bug ，但似乎核心开发人员并没有处理它。该票证包含针对像我一样遇到此问题的人的补丁。

Answer 1

不幸的是，覆盖约定并不像您期望的插件的generator.yml 那样工作。最简单的方法是配置插件的generator.yml 文件，这就是我所做的。

您还可以将插件的generator.yml移动(而不是复制)到您的应用程序/模块。此线程还有一个有趣的解决方案:http://oldforum.symfony-project.org/index.php/m/43279/