- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我在使用 DiffUtil.ItemCallback
库时遇到问题,其中列表项的旧状态最终会丢失并导致 oldTask
具有相同的值作为newTask
。
当我选中/取消选中 ListAdapter 中的复选框并且 LiveData 观察器中的 onChanged()
调用 DiffUtil.ItemCallback
函数时,就会发生这种情况。正如您在 onBindViewHolder()
中看到的,该操作调用 setCompleted()
,从而否定 isCompleted()
的值。过期任务(红色)的预期行为是在选中复选框时变为白色。这是因为,当 isCompleted()
返回 true
时,isOverdue()
只能返回 false。
onBindViewHolder():
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(@NonNull ViewHolder viewHolder, int i) {
SubTask subTask = getItem(i);
Log.d(TAG, "onBindViewHolder: CALLED");
viewHolder.subTaskName.setText(subTask.getName());
Calendar dueDate = subTask.getDueDate();
viewHolder.dueDate.setText(context.getResources().getString(R.string.due_date, dueDate.getDisplayName(Calendar.DAY_OF_WEEK, Calendar.LONG, Locale.getDefault()), dueDate.getDisplayName(Calendar.MONTH, Calendar.LONG, Locale.getDefault()), dueDate.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH), dueDate.get(Calendar.YEAR)));
viewHolder.checkBox.setOnCheckedChangeListener(null);
//check of sub task if completed
if (subTask.isCompleted()) {
viewHolder.checkBox.setChecked(true);
} else {
viewHolder.checkBox.setChecked(false);
}
if (subTask.isOverdue()) {
viewHolder.card.setCardBackgroundColor(context.getColor(R.color.red));
viewHolder.subTaskName.setTextColor(context.getColor(R.color.colorAccent));
viewHolder.dueDate.setTextColor(context.getColor(R.color.colorAccent));
} else {
viewHolder.card.setCardBackgroundColor(context.getColor(R.color.colorAccent));
viewHolder.subTaskName.setTextAppearance(R.style.TextAppearance_AppCompat_Large);
viewHolder.dueDate.setTextColor(context.getColor(R.color.main_task_text_color));
}
viewHolder.checkBox.setOnCheckedChangeListener(new CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener() {
@Override
public void onCheckedChanged(CompoundButton buttonView, boolean isChecked) {
Log.d(TAG, "onCheckedChanged: called for subTask " + subTask.getName() + " isChecked = " + isChecked);
viewModel = ViewModelProviders.of((FragmentActivity) context).get(ViewSubTasksForMainTaskViewModel.class);
if (isChecked) {
//if overdue, change card to white
subTask.setCompleted(true);
viewModel.updateSubTask(subTask);
} else {
//if overdue, set color back to red
subTask.setCompleted(false);
viewModel.updateSubTask(subTask);
}
}
});
}
但是,当 areContentsTheSame()
尝试比较旧列表和新列表中的值时,有时它不应该返回 true
,因为 isCompleted()
应该为旧列表项和新列表项返回不同的值。列表项的旧状态似乎以某种方式丢失了。由于未调用 onBindViewHolder()
,这会导致列表项渲染不正确。 Here is a GIF这显示了应用程序的行为方式。正如您所看到的,列表项即使被选中也是红色的,列表项即使未被选中也是白色的。您还可以看到某些列表项正确呈现,但并非全部。
DiffCallback:
public class SubTaskDiffCallback {
private static final String TAG = "SubTaskDiffCallback";
static public DiffUtil.ItemCallback<SubTask> getSubTaskDiffCallback() {
return new DiffUtil.ItemCallback<SubTask>() {
@Override
public boolean areItemsTheSame(@NonNull SubTask oldTask, @NonNull SubTask newTask) {
Log.d(TAG, "areItemsTheSame: " + oldTask.getName() + " " + newTask.getName() + " " + Boolean.toString(oldTask.getId() == newTask.getId()));
return oldTask.getId() == newTask.getId();
}
@Override
public boolean areContentsTheSame(@NonNull SubTask oldTask, @NonNull SubTask newTask) {
Log.d(TAG, "areContentsTheSame: oldTask " + oldTask.toString());
Log.d(TAG, "areContentsTheSame: newTask " + newTask.toString());
boolean contentsSame = oldTask.getName().equals(newTask.getName()) &&
oldTask.getDueDate().equals(newTask.getDueDate()) &&
oldTask.isCompleted() == newTask.isCompleted() &&
oldTask.getMainTaskId() == (newTask.getMainTaskId());
Log.d(TAG, "areContentsTheSame = " + contentsSame);
return contentsSame;
}
@Nullable
@Override
public Object getChangePayload(@NonNull SubTask oldTask, @NonNull SubTask newTask) {
if (oldTask.isCompleted() != newTask.isCompleted()) {
Log.d(TAG, "getChangePayload = false");
return Boolean.FALSE;
} else {
return null;
}
}
};
}
}
以下是上面链接的 GIF 中所发生事件的部分日志:
2020-02-02 15:45:21.536 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onCheckedChanged: called for subTask Wash car isChecked = true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.555 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.555 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.556 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.556 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.556 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.556 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.557 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.557 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.557 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.557 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.558 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.558 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:21.558 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.558 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:21.558 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.979 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onCheckedChanged: called for subTask Read OS book isChecked = true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:22.999 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:23.000 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.001 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.001 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:23.002 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.002 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.002 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = false
2020-02-02 15:45:23.003 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.004 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:23.004 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:23.004 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: getChangePayload = false
2020-02-02 15:45:23.014 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onBindViewHolder: CALLED
2020-02-02 15:45:24.275 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onCheckedChanged: called for subTask Read database book isChecked = true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.294 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.295 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.295 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.295 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.296 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.296 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.296 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:24.296 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.297 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:24.297 8226-11254/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = false
2020-02-02 15:45:24.297 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: getChangePayload = false
2020-02-02 15:45:24.308 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onBindViewHolder: CALLED
2020-02-02 15:45:26.590 8226-8226/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/ViewSTForMTAdapter: onCheckedChanged: called for subTask Read database book isChecked = false
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read database book Read database book true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Read OS book Read OS book true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.608 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areItemsTheSame: Wash car Wash car true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.609 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.609 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Wash car, dueDate = Mar 17, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.609 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.610 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.610 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read OS book, dueDate = Mar 20, 2019, overdue = false, completed = true]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.610 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
2020-02-02 15:45:26.611 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: oldTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.611 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame: newTask SubTask[name = Read database book, dueDate = Mar 23, 2019, overdue = true, completed = false]
2020-02-02 15:45:26.611 8226-11255/com.johnsorhannus.divideandconquer D/SubTaskDiffCallback: areContentsTheSame = true
我确信 setCompleted()
更改了 isCompleted()
的值,因为当您退出并重新进入 Activity 时,it renders properly .
最佳答案
DiffUtil
通过引用存储旧项目 - 它不会复制它们。您的 SubTask
类是可变的,因此当您调用 setCompleted
时,您也将更改 DiffUtil 引用的旧类。 DiffUtil
只能与旧的、未更改的对象列表进行比较。因为您更改了旧对象,并且它仅具有对您现在更改的对象的引用,所以它不知道正确的旧值。
关于java - DiffUtil.ItemCallback 有时会丢失 oldItem 并导致 areContentsTheSame() 错误地返回 true,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60030719/
我正在尝试使用 Spark 从 Cassandra 读取数据。 DataFrame rdf = sqlContext.read().option("keyspace", "readypulse
这是代码: void i_log_ (int error, const char * file, int line, const char * fmt, ...) { /* Get erro
我必须调试一个严重依赖 Gtk 的程序。问题是由于某些原因,在使用 GtkWindow 对象时开始出现许多运行时警告。问题是,即使 Gtk 提示严重错误,它也不会因这些错误而中止。我没有代码库的更改历
我正在尝试从已有效编译和链接的程序中检索二进制文件。我已经通过 GL_PROGRAM_BINARY_LENGTH 收到了它的长度。该文档说有两个实例可能会发生 GL_INVALID_OPERATION
我有一个托管在 Azure 环境中的服务。我正在使用控制台应用程序使用该服务。这样做时,我得到了异常: "The requested service, 'http://xxxx-d.yyyy.be/S
我有以下代码,它被 SEGV 信号杀死。使用调试器表明它被 main() 中的第一个 sem_init() 杀死。如果我注释掉第一个 sem_init() ,第二个会导致同样的问题。我试图弄清楚是什么
目前我正在编写一个应用程序(目标 iOS 6,启用 ARC),它使用 JSON 进行数据传输,使用核心数据进行持久存储。 JSON 数据由 PHP 脚本通过 json_encode 从 MySQL 数
我对 Xamarin.Forms 还是很陌生。我在出现的主页上有一个非常简单的功能 async public Task BaseAppearing() { if (UserID
这是我的代码的简化版本。 public class MainActivity extends ActionBarActivity { private ArrayList entry = new Arr
我想弄明白为什么我的两个 Java 库很难很好地协同工作。这是场景: 库 1 有一个类 A,其构造函数如下: public A(Object obj) { /* boilerplate */ } 在以
如果网站不需要身份验证,我的代码可以正常工作,如果需要,则在打印“已创建凭据”后会立即出现 EXC_BAD_ACCESS 错误。我不会发布任何内容,并且此代码是直接从文档中复制的 - 知道出了什么问题
我在使用 NSArray 填充 UITableView 时遇到问题。我确信我正在做一些愚蠢的事情,但我无法弄清楚。当我尝试进行简单的计数时,我得到了 EXC_BAD_ACCESS,我知道这是因为我试图
我在 UITableViewCell 上有一个 UITextField,在另一个单元格上有一个按钮。 我单击 UITextField(出现键盘)。 UITextField 调用了以下方法: - (BO
我有一个应用程序出现间歇性崩溃。崩溃日志显示了一个堆栈跟踪,这对我来说很难破译,因此希望其他人看到了这一点并能为我指出正确的方向。 基本上,应用程序在启动时执行反向地理编码请求,以在标签中显示用户的位
我开发了一个 CGImage,当程序使用以下命令将其显示在屏幕上时它工作正常: [output_view.layer performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(set
我正在使用新的 EncryptedSharedPreferences以谷歌推荐的方式上课: private fun securePrefs(context: Context): SharedPrefe
我有一个中继器,里面有一些控件,其中一个是文本框。我正在尝试使用 jquery 获取文本框,我的代码如下所示: $("#").click(function (event) {}); 但我总是得到 nu
在以下场景中观察到 TTS 初始化错误,太随机了。 已安装 TTS 引擎,存在语音集,并且可以从辅助功能选项中播放示例 tts。 TTS 初始化在之前初始化和播放的同一设备上随机失败。 在不同的设备(
maven pom.xml org.openjdk.jol jol-core 0.10 Java 类: public class MyObjectData { pr
在不担心冲突的情况下,可以使用 MD5 作为哈希值,字符串长度最多为多少? 这可能是通过为特定字符集中的每个可能的字符串生成 MD5 哈希来计算的,长度不断增加,直到哈希第二次出现(冲突)。没有冲突的
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!