f# - 如何在 CPS 中编写此内容？

Question

我正在努力掌握连续传球风格 (CPS)，因此我正在修改 Gary Short 很久以前给我看的一个例子。我没有他的示例源代码，所以我试图从内存中修改他的示例。考虑以下代码:

let checkedDiv m n =
    match n with
    | 0.0 -> None
    | _ -> Some(m/n)

let reciprocal r = checkedDiv 1.0 r

let resistance c1 c2 c3 =
     (fun c1 -> if (reciprocal c1).IsSome then 
        (fun c2 -> if (reciprocal c2).IsSome then
            (fun c3 -> if (reciprocal c3).IsSome then 
                Some((reciprocal c1).Value + (reciprocal c2).Value + (reciprocal c3).Value))));;

我不太明白的是如何构造阻力函数。我早些时候想到了这个:

let resistance r1 r2 r3 =
        if (reciprocal r1).IsSome then
            if (reciprocal r2).IsSome then
                if (reciprocal r3).IsSome then
                    Some((reciprocal r1).Value + (reciprocal r2).Value + (reciprocal r3).Value)
                else
                    None
            else
                None
        else
            None 

但是，当然，这并没有使用 CPS——更不用说它看起来真的很老套，而且有相当多的重复代码，这看起来也像是一种代码味道。

谁能告诉我如何用 CPS 方式重写阻力函数？

Answer 1

直接的方式:

let resistance_cps c1 c2 c3 = 
    let reciprocal_cps r k = k (checkedDiv 1.0 r)
    reciprocal_cps c1 <| 
        function
        | Some rc1 -> 
            reciprocal_cps c2 <| 
                function
                | Some rc2 -> 
                    reciprocal_cps c3 <|
                        function 
                        | Some rc3 -> Some (rc1 + rc2 + rc3)
                        | _ -> None
                | _ -> None
        | _ -> None

或者使用 Option.bind 更短一些

let resistance_cps2 c1 c2 c3 = 
    let reciprocal_cps r k = k (checkedDiv 1.0 r)
    reciprocal_cps c1 <|
        Option.bind(fun rc1 -> 
            reciprocal_cps c2 <| 
                Option.bind(fun rc2 ->
                    reciprocal_cps c3 <| 
                        Option.bind(fun rc3 -> Some (rc1 + rc2 + rc3))
                )
        )