java - Okhttp 或 HTTPClient : Which offers better functionality and more efficiency?

Question

已结束。此问题正在寻求书籍、工具、软件库等的推荐。它不满足 Stack Overflow guidelines 。目前不接受答案。

---

我们不允许提出寻求书籍、工具、软件库等推荐的问题。您可以编辑问题，以便用事实和引文来回答。

已关闭 3 年前。

社区去年审查了是否重新开放此问题，并将其关闭:

原始关闭原因未解决

Improve this question

为了发出http请求，JAVA中有一些API可供选择，例如Apache HttpClient和Okhttp。 Apache HttpClient 已经成熟并且被广泛使用，而 Okhttp 似乎越来越流行(我不确定)。

我想知道的是，哪个更好，或者 Apache HttpClient 是否具有 Okhttp 没有的某些功能，或者反之亦然？大多数情况下，我谈论的是服务器端，谈论在 Android 应用程序中使用也非常好。

我希望能列出一些要点，这样我就可以弄清楚Apache HttpClient和Okhttp之间的区别。

引用:

URLConnection 和 HttpClient 之间存在问题: URLConnection or HTTPClient : Which offers better functionality and more efficiency?

Answer 1

我建议使用okhttp。原因如下:https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/3472

OkHttp has HTTP/2, a built-in response cache, web sockets, and a simpler API. It’s got better defaults and is easier to use efficiently. It’s got a better URL model, a better cookie model, a better headers model and a better call model. OkHttp makes canceling calls easy. OkHttp has carefully managed TLS defaults that are secure and widely compatible. Okhttp works with Retrofit, which is a brilliant API for REST. It also works with Okio, which is a great library for data streams. OkHttp is a small library with one small dependency (Okio) and is less code to learn. OkHttp is more widely deployed, with a billion Android 4.4+ devices using it internally.