- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我们正在模拟一个 3rd 方模块,它有一个带有许多嵌套实例的大型 api。它的各种对象通常通过属性、get() 或字典索引 [] 访问。拥有一个将所有 3 个都视为简单属性访问的灵活模拟将非常方便。
class FlexiMock(MagicMock):
def get(self, x, default=None):
return getattr(self, x, default)
def __getitem__(self, x):
return getattr(self, x)
t = FlexiMock(status=1)
assert t.status == 1
assert t.get('status') == 1
assert t['status'] == 1, f"{t['status']} vs 1"
结果:
assert t['status'] == 1, f"{t['status']} vs 1"
AssertionError: <FlexiMock name='mock.__getitem__()' id='140549581528368'> vs 1
这看起来很简单,所以我不确定我做错了什么。
最佳答案
unittest.mock
中的类不能很好地与用户定义的子类一起使用。特别是,unittest.mock.MagicMock
做了一些奇怪的事情。当创建一个新实例时,它会获得自己动态生成的子类,该子类会覆盖几乎所有的魔术方法。您的 __getitem__
被动态生成的子类中的 __getitem__
覆盖:
In [1]: from unittest.mock import MagicMock
In [2]: class FlexiMock(MagicMock):
...: def get(self, x, default=None):
...: return getattr(self, x, default)
...:
...: def __getitem__(self, x):
...: return getattr(self, x)
...:
In [3]: t = FlexiMock(status=1)
In [4]: type(t).__mro__
Out[4]:
(unittest.mock.FlexiMock,
__main__.FlexiMock,
unittest.mock.MagicMock,
unittest.mock.MagicMixin,
unittest.mock.Mock,
unittest.mock.CallableMixin,
unittest.mock.NonCallableMock,
unittest.mock.Base,
object)
In [5]: type(t).__dict__
Out[5]:
mappingproxy({'__doc__': None,
'__module__': 'unittest.mock',
'__pos__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4506cb80>,
'__rsub__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffe4d60>,
'__int__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff40130>,
'__ifloordiv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44084fa0>,
'__trunc__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440840a0>,
'__complex__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffdf160>,
'__rlshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffdf8e0>,
'__sub__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffdf550>,
'__delitem__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffdf520>,
'__matmul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd71f0>,
'__imatmul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd95e0>,
'__rshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd9610>,
'__gt__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd9d60>,
'__round__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd9ee0>,
'__idiv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffd91f0>,
'__neg__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffc9730>,
'__fspath__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ffc92b0>,
'__imod__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a5b0>,
'__rdiv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a6a0>,
'__add__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a250>,
'__aiter__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404af70>,
'__floordiv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a400>,
'__xor__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404aaf0>,
'__next__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a850>,
'__rrshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a8b0>,
'__truediv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404afa0>,
'__imul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd4404a070>,
'__eq__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bc70>,
'__ior__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b580>,
'__enter__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b280>,
'__abs__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bdf0>,
'__le__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b4c0>,
'__rdivmod__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8ba30>,
'__getitem__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bc10>,
'__sizeof__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b0a0>,
'__bool__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b1f0>,
'__or__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b4f0>,
'__radd__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b730>,
'__lt__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b070>,
'__rtruediv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b3d0>,
'__rmatmul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bb20>,
'__mul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bb80>,
'__divmod__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8ba00>,
'__float__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b6a0>,
'__and__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bd00>,
'__len__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bca0>,
'__ixor__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b5e0>,
'__index__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8b670>,
'__aexit__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd3ff8bdc0>,
'__lshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd45062340>,
'__rfloordiv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd450628b0>,
'__ge__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd450622b0>,
'__irshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd45062a90>,
'__iadd__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440615b0>,
'__iter__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061790>,
'__ne__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440613a0>,
'__ilshift__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061910>,
'__rpow__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440614f0>,
'__ror__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061880>,
'__div__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440618e0>,
'__isub__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061670>,
'__hash__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440617c0>,
'__rand__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061640>,
'__setitem__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061610>,
'__iand__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440618b0>,
'__invert__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061760>,
'__ipow__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440619d0>,
'__str__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061a30>,
'__contains__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061a90>,
'__ceil__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061040>,
'__anext__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061100>,
'__exit__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440610d0>,
'__floor__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061490>,
'__rmul__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd440613d0>,
'__mod__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061730>,
'__aenter__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061af0>,
'__pow__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061b20>,
'__rmod__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061b80>,
'__rxor__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061be0>,
'__itruediv__': <unittest.mock.MagicProxy at 0x7fcd44061c40>})
这里,unittest.mock.FlexiMock
是动态生成的子类,带有一个充满魔法方法覆盖的字典。
与其尝试子类化 unittest.mock
类,支持的覆盖方法的 API 只是创建一个常规模拟并在实例上设置方法。请注意,由于额外的 unittest.mock
怪异,魔法方法应该采用 self
,但其他方法应该不采用self
:
def make_fleximock(*args, **kwargs):
mock = MagicMock(*args, **kwargs)
mock.get = lambda x, default=None: getattr(mock, x, default)
mock.__getitem__ = lambda self, x: getattr(self, x)
return mock
关于python - 如何覆盖 MagicMock 子类上的 __getitem__,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67580353/
当 __getitem__ 映射到内部序列类型时,以下哪一项是推荐的执行方式? class A: def __init__(self, ...): ... se
这是我在leetcode中遇到的问题。您将看到两个非空链接表,表示两个非负整数。数字以相反的顺序存储,并且它们的每个节点都包含一个数字。将这两个数字相加,然后以链表的形式返回总和。。你可以假设这两个数
我正在通过继承 torch.utils.data.Dataset 创建一个数据集类并遇到了以下问题。 与返回固定类型值的先前函数不同,__getitem__没有。例如, class MyExample
我有一个自定义类Field的对象,它本质上包裹着一个numpy.ndarray对象。该对象由两个输入定义:一个值数组 (values) 和一个切片对象 (segment),该对象定义这些值应放置在某个
我有一个简单的问题,这行代码 row[time] == numbers[num_time]: 给我错误: int has no attribute __getitem__ 经过一些研究,我发现当您尝试
我是 python 的初学者,正在尝试通过测试 test_pic 和包含图像的数据库来查找图像之间的相似性。我已经从目录传递了图像并使用 SIFT 功能对其进行了比较 from PIL import
这是 Python 在切片中传递负数的行为示例: >>> class test: ... def __getitem__(self, sl): ... print sl.st
我正在制作一个树类,我想要 __getitem__方法来获取元组参数,所以我这样使用它: t[1, 2, 3] 但是,当我想获取根值时,我需要给它一个空元组,当我这样做时 t[] 我收到语法错误: >
我正在创建一个表示列表列表的类。 __getitem__ 让我头疼。在我将切片作为参数引入之前,一切都进行得很顺利。 演示代码 # Python version 2.7.5 class NestedL
序列(例如列表)的方法 __getitem__() 可以返回单个项目或项目序列。例如,给定下面的函数装饰: def __getitem__(self, index) -> Union[Product,
我正在编写基本的 PSO(粒子群优化),并且一直收到此错误,即粒子实例没有属性 __getitem__。我认为一切都很好,但 article 类似乎有一些错误。看一下 article 类。 from
我无法理解我收到此错误 -> 实例方法没有属性 getitem。我只是想抓取这个网站以提取部门名称。 import scrapy from scrapy.contrib.spiders import
你好,StackOverflowers, 我正在实现一个二叉搜索树,其接口(interface)与 Python 中的 dict 几乎相同(在有人问之前,我这样做是为了好玩,没有生产代码)。 为了从我
这个问题在这里已经有了答案: How to inherit and extend a list object in Python? (4 个答案) 关闭 5 个月前。 我正在尝试定义一个默认样式列表
我为使用列表列表的 connect 4 游戏创建了一个 Board 类。我想让对象支持对面板的行和列进行索引: class Test: def __init__(self, cols, row
有没有办法以支持整数和切片索引的方式实现 __getitem__ 而无需手动检查参数类型? 我看到了很多这种形式的例子,但我觉得它很老套。 def __getitem__(self,key): i
class Custom(type): @classmethod def __getitem__(cls, item): raise NotImplementedErr
我有这个代码: class A: def __init__(self): def method(self, item): print self, ":
python 中是否有一些内部的东西来处理传递给 __getitem_ 的参数 _ 不同,并自动将 start:stop:step 构造转换为切片? 下面是我的意思的演示 class ExampleC
我有两个这样的模型: class School(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length = 50) def __unicod
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!