java - 使用 JAVA 从 Socket 读取数据时减少 CPU 开销

Question

我有两个线程会增加 CPU 开销。1. 以同步方式从socket读取。2.等待接受其他客户端的连接

问题1，我只是想读取来自客户端的任何数据，并且我无法使用readline，因为传入的数据具有换行符，我将其标记为了解消息的 header 末尾。所以我在线程中使用这种方式，但它增加了CPU开销

 public static String convertStreamToString(TCPServerConnectionListner socket) throws UnsupportedEncodingException, IOException, InterruptedException {

        BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getSocket().getInputStream()));
        // At this point it is too early to read. So it most likely return false
        System.out.println("Buffer Reader ready? " + reader.ready());
        // StringBuilder to hold the response
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        // Indicator to show if we have started to receive data or not
        boolean dataStreamStarted = false;
        // How many times we went to sleep waiting for data
        int sleepCounter = 0;
        // How many times (max) we will sleep before bailing out
        int sleepMaxCounter = 5;
        // Sleep max counter after data started
        int sleepMaxDataCounter = 50;
        // How long to sleep for each cycle
        int sleepTime = 5;
        // Start time
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        // This is a tight loop. Not sure what it will do to CPU
        while (true) {
            if (reader.ready()) {
                sb.append((char) reader.read());
                // Once started we do not expect server to stop in the middle and restart
                dataStreamStarted = true;
            } else {
                Thread.sleep(sleepTime);
                if (dataStreamStarted && (sleepCounter >= sleepMaxDataCounter)) {
                    System.out.println("Reached max sleep time of " + (sleepMaxDataCounter * sleepTime) + " ms after data started");
                    break;
                } else {
                    if (sleepCounter >= sleepMaxCounter) {
                        System.out.println("Reached max sleep time of " + (sleepMaxCounter * sleepTime) + " ms. Bailing out");
                        // Reached max timeout waiting for data. Bail..
                        break;
                    }
                }
                sleepCounter++;
            }

        }
        long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();

        System.out.println(sb.toString());
        System.out.println("Time " + (endTime - startTime));

        return sb.toString();
    }

问题2，我不知道最好的方法是什么，我只是有一个线程不断等待其他客户端并接受它。但这也需要大量的CPU开销。

 // Listner to accept any client connection
    @Override
    public void run() {

        while (true) {
            try {
                mutex.acquire();
                if (!welcomeSocket.isClosed()) {
                    connectionSocket = welcomeSocket.accept();
                   // Thread.sleep(5);
                }


            } catch (IOException ex) {
                Logger.getLogger(TCPServerConnectionListner.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
            } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
                Logger.getLogger(TCPServerConnectionListner.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
            }
            finally
            {
                mutex.release();
            }

        }
    }
}

分析器图片也会有所帮助，但我想知道为什么 SwingWorker 线程需要那么多时间？

更新问题一的代码:

    public static String convertStreamToString(TCPServerConnectionListner socket) throws UnsupportedEncodingException, IOException, InterruptedException {

            byte[] resultBuff = new byte[0];
            byte[] buff = new byte[65534];
            int k = -1;
            k = socket.getSocket().getInputStream().read(buff, 0, buff.length);
                byte[] tbuff = new byte[resultBuff.length + k]; // temp buffer size = bytes already read + bytes last read
                System.arraycopy(resultBuff, 0, tbuff, 0, resultBuff.length); // copy previous bytes
                System.arraycopy(buff, 0, tbuff, resultBuff.length, k);  // copy current lot
                resultBuff = tbuff; // call the temp buffer as your result buff

        return new String(resultBuff);
    }

}
        ![snapshot][2]

Answer 1

只需摆脱 ready() 调用并阻塞即可。在 ready() 为 false 时所做的一切实际上完全是浪费时间，包括 sleep 。 read() 将阻塞正确的时间。 sleep() 不会。您要么 sleep 时间不够长，这会浪费 CPU 时间，要么 sleep 时间太长，这会增加延迟。偶尔你可能会睡在正确的时间，但这是100%的运气，而不是良好的管理。如果您想要读取超时，请使用读取超时。