- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我遇到了一个奇怪的问题,当我尝试访问结构成员时,我的程序出现段错误,但我的结构的地址不为空,而且我从未释放过该结构。
该结构的地址类似于“0x8000000000”或“0x2000000000”。
这是 gdb 的 bt :
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000001000039cc in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x8000000000000) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:43
43 while (i < files->len)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000001000039cc in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x8000000000000) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:43
#1 0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x10080a400) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#2 0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x1001080d0) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#3 0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100801800) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#4 0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100801200) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#5 0x0000000100003a3c in ft_sort_ascii (files=0x100104c10) at srcs/sort/ascii.c:50
#6 0x0000000100002137 in main (ac=1, av=0x7fff5fbff758) at srcs/main.c:26
valgrind 报告:
==29835==
==29835== HEAP SUMMARY:
==29835== in use at exit: 415,075 bytes in 11,152 blocks
==29835== total heap usage: 17,711 allocs, 6,559 frees, 3,960,490 bytes allocated
==29835==
==29835== 112 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 106 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000CCA1: calloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x1004ABC11: class_createInstance (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==29835== by 0x10010F920: _os_object_alloc_realized (in /usr/lib/system/libdispatch.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1004650D5: _xpc_pipe_create (in /usr/lib/system/libxpc.dylib)
==29835== by 0x100467655: xpc_pipe_create (in /usr/lib/system/libxpc.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1002AE100: _od_xpc_pipe (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1002AE044: _od_running (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1002ADFD8: ds_user_byuid (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1002ADF46: search_item_bynumber (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1002ADE82: getpwuid (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_info.dylib)
==29835== by 0x1000029EB: ft_get_file_infos (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x1000027B4: ft_set_infos_foreach (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 121 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 107 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 405 bytes in 5 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 130 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 516 bytes in 20 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 133 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 2,523 bytes in 27 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 157 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 6,124 bytes in 140 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 165 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 6,493 bytes in 205 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 166 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002F6B: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100003061: ft_open_directories (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x10000276E: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== 341,832 (104 direct, 341,728 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 178 of 178
==29835== at 0x10000C59B: malloc (in /usr/local/Cellar/valgrind/HEAD/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-darwin.so)
==29835== by 0x100002474: ft_set_files (in ./ft_ls)
==29835== by 0x100002120: main (in ./ft_ls)
==29835==
==29835== LEAK SUMMARY:
==29835== definitely lost: 16,398 bytes in 400 blocks
==29835== indirectly lost: 341,728 bytes in 10,269 blocks
==29835== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==29835== still reachable: 22,201 bytes in 62 blocks
==29835== suppressed: 34,748 bytes in 421 blocks
==29835== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==29835== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==29835==
==29835== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==29835== ERROR SUMMARY: 1243 errors from 14 contexts (suppressed: 21 from 21)
似乎我有很多错误/泄漏,我没有释放我曾经使用过的内存(我所有的 t_files),因为它们将在程序结束时被释放。
这是我的代码:
static void ft_swap_files(t_files *files, size_t *i)
{
size_t j;
t_files tmp;
j = *i + 1;
while (j < files->len)
{
if (files[j].error < 0)
{
if (ft_strcmp(files[*i].name, files[j].name) > 0)
{
tmp = files[*i];
files[*i] = files[j];
files[j] = tmp;
*i = -1;
return ;
}
}
j++;
}
}
void ft_sort_ascii(t_files *files)
{
size_t i;
i = 0;
while (i < files->len)
{
if (files[i].error < 0)
{
ft_swap_files(files, &i);
if (files[i].files != NULL)
{
ft_sort_ascii(files[i].files);
}
}
i++;
}
}
我的 t_files 结构:
typedef struct s_files
{
size_t len;
t_bool hidden;
int error;
char *path;
char *name;
char *sym_name;
char *rights;
char *uid;
char *gid;
char *time;
int nlink_max;
int size_max;
/*
** from stat
*/
int type;
int nlink;
int size;
t_bool rd;
struct s_files *files;
} t_files;
多次递归调用后会出现此错误。“files[i].files”在另一个文件中初始化为 NULL,并在必要时进行 malloc。
递归调用可能会导致问题?
谢谢;)
最佳答案
ft_sort_ascii()
中存在潜在的数组下溢访问。在 ft_swap_files()
中,您有代码:
*i = -1;
return ;
}
它返回ft_sort_ascii()
中的以下代码:
ft_swap_files(files, &i);
if (files[i].files != NULL) // Underflow here if i == -1
{
ft_sort_ascii(files[i].files); // and here if it gets this far
}
它使files[]
数组下溢。在使用 i
执行任何数组访问之前,您需要检查它是否是有效索引。
关于c - 访问结构体成员时出现段错误,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28948340/
#include using namespace std; class C{ private: int value; public: C(){ value = 0;
这个问题已经有答案了: What is the difference between char a[] = ?string?; and char *p = ?string?;? (8 个回答) 已关闭
关闭。此题需要details or clarity 。目前不接受答案。 想要改进这个问题吗?通过 editing this post 添加详细信息并澄清问题. 已关闭 7 年前。 此帖子已于 8 个月
除了调试之外,是否有任何针对 c、c++ 或 c# 的测试工具,其工作原理类似于将独立函数复制粘贴到某个文本框,然后在其他文本框中输入参数? 最佳答案 也许您会考虑单元测试。我推荐你谷歌测试和谷歌模拟
我想在第二台显示器中移动一个窗口 (HWND)。问题是我尝试了很多方法,例如将分辨率加倍或输入负值,但它永远无法将窗口放在我的第二台显示器上。 关于如何在 C/C++/c# 中执行此操作的任何线索 最
我正在寻找 C/C++/C## 中不同类型 DES 的现有实现。我的运行平台是Windows XP/Vista/7。 我正在尝试编写一个 C# 程序,它将使用 DES 算法进行加密和解密。我需要一些实
很难说出这里要问什么。这个问题模棱两可、含糊不清、不完整、过于宽泛或夸夸其谈,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开,visit the help center . 关闭 1
有没有办法强制将另一个 窗口置于顶部? 不是应用程序的窗口,而是另一个已经在系统上运行的窗口。 (Windows, C/C++/C#) 最佳答案 SetWindowPos(that_window_ha
假设您可以在 C/C++ 或 Csharp 之间做出选择,并且您打算在 Windows 和 Linux 服务器上运行同一服务器的多个实例,那么构建套接字服务器应用程序的最明智选择是什么? 最佳答案 如
你们能告诉我它们之间的区别吗? 顺便问一下,有什么叫C++库或C库的吗? 最佳答案 C++ 标准库 和 C 标准库 是 C++ 和 C 标准定义的库,提供给 C++ 和 C 程序使用。那是那些词的共同
下面的测试代码,我将输出信息放在注释中。我使用的是 gcc 4.8.5 和 Centos 7.2。 #include #include class C { public:
很难说出这里问的是什么。这个问题是含糊的、模糊的、不完整的、过于宽泛的或修辞性的,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开它,visit the help center 。 已关
我的客户将使用名为 annoucement 的结构/类与客户通信。我想我会用 C++ 编写服务器。会有很多不同的类继承annoucement。我的问题是通过网络将这些类发送给客户端 我想也许我应该使用
我在 C# 中有以下函数: public Matrix ConcatDescriptors(IList> descriptors) { int cols = descriptors[0].Co
我有一个项目要编写一个函数来对某些数据执行某些操作。我可以用 C/C++ 编写代码,但我不想与雇主共享该函数的代码。相反,我只想让他有权在他自己的代码中调用该函数。是否可以?我想到了这两种方法 - 在
我使用的是编写糟糕的第 3 方 (C/C++) Api。我从托管代码(C++/CLI)中使用它。有时会出现“访问冲突错误”。这使整个应用程序崩溃。我知道我无法处理这些错误[如果指针访问非法内存位置等,
关闭。这个问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。 我们不允许提问寻求书籍、工具、软件库等的推荐。您可以编辑问题,以便用事实和引用来回答。 关闭 7 年前。
已关闭。此问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines 。目前不接受答案。 要求我们推荐或查找工具、库或最喜欢的场外资源的问题对于 Stack Overflow 来说是偏离主题的,因为
我有一些 C 代码,将使用 P/Invoke 从 C# 调用。我正在尝试为这个 C 函数定义一个 C# 等效项。 SomeData* DoSomething(); struct SomeData {
这个问题已经有答案了: Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? (14 个回答) 已关闭 6
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!