sql - 具有重复参数的 PostgreSQL 函数

Question

我在 pg_catalog.pg_stat_get_activity 中偶然发现了一个奇怪的函数签名:

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_stat_get_activity(
    IN pid integer, 
    OUT datid oid,
    OUT pid integer, 
    -- more parameters...)
  RETURNS SETOF record AS 'pg_stat_get_activity'
  LANGUAGE internal STABLE
  COST 1
  ROWS 100;

这个函数声明了两次相同的参数名称，这也是从information_schema中报告的。

select 
  parameter_mode,
  parameter_name
from information_schema.parameters
where specific_schema = 'pg_catalog'
and specific_name like 'pg_stat_get_activity%'
order by ordinal_position

以上产量(另见 SQLFiddle ):

+--------------+----------------+
|parameter_mode|parameter_name  |
+--------------+----------------+
|IN            |pid             |
|OUT           |datid           |
|OUT           |pid             |
|...           |...             |
+--------------+----------------+

天真地，我尝试创建一个类似的函数，但无济于事:

CREATE FUNCTION f_2647(p1 IN int, p1 OUT int)
AS $$
BEGIN
    p1 := p1;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

我的问题:

1. 为什么内部 pg_stat_get_activity 函数会两次重新声明相同的参数名称？这样做的目的是什么？例如。为什么不直接使用 INOUT 参数？
2. 内部 pg_stat_get_activity 函数和我的有什么不同？为什么我不能使用这种语法？

我知道这些是相当学术的问题，但我需要正确理解它才能修复 issue在jOOQ代码生成器。

Answer 1

我注意到它出现在 9.2 中。在 9.1 版本中，out 字段被命名为 procpid:

 parameter_mode |  parameter_name  ----------------+------------------ IN             | pid OUT            | datid OUT            | procpid OUT            | usesysid ...

在 postgres git 历史记录中寻找更改会导致此提交:

commit 4f42b546fd87a80be30c53a0f2c897acb826ad52Author: Magnus Hagander Date:   Thu Jan 19 14:19:20 2012 +0100    Separate state from query string in pg_stat_activity    This separates the state (running/idle/idleintransaction etc) into    it's own field ("state"), and leaves the query field containing just    query text.    The query text will now mean "current query" when a query is running    and "last query" in other states. Accordingly,the field has been    renamed from current_query to query.    Since backwards compatibility was broken anyway to make that, the procpid    field has also been renamed to pid - along with the same field in    pg_stat_replication for consistency.    Scott Mead and Magnus Hagander, review work from Greg Smith

在更改的行中，这里是感兴趣的行:

-DATA(insert OID = 2022 (  pg_stat_get_activity         PGNSP PGUID 12 1 100 0 0 f f f f t s 1 0 2249 "23" "{23,26,23,26,25,25,16,1184,1184,1184,869,25,23}" "{i,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o}" "{pid,datid,procpid,usesysid,application_name,current_query,waiting,xact_start,query_start,backend_start,client_addr,client_hostname,client_port}" _null_ pg_stat_get_activity _null_ _null_ _null_ ));+DATA(insert OID = 2022 (  pg_stat_get_activity         PGNSP PGUID 12 1 100 0 0 f f f f t s 1 0 2249 "23" "{23,26,23,26,25,25,25,16,1184,1184,1184,1184,869,25,23}" "{i,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o}" "{pid,datid,pid,usesysid,application_name,state,query,waiting,xact_start,query_start,backend_start,state_change,client_addr,client_hostname,client_port}" _null_ pg_stat_get_activity _null_ _null_ _null_ )); 

在这种预先消化的形式中，作者可能没有注意到 pid 的双重使用，或者他们不在乎，因为它在实践中是无害的。

允许通过是因为这些内部函数是由 initdb 在跳过普通用户函数的创建检查的快速路径中创建的。