- html - 出于某种原因,IE8 对我的 Sass 文件中继承的 html5 CSS 不友好?
- JMeter 在响应断言中使用 span 标签的问题
- html - 在 :hover and :active? 上具有不同效果的 CSS 动画
- html - 相对于居中的 html 内容固定的 CSS 重复背景?
我使用大量 COUNT 和 SUM 对数据库进行查询。对于大量记录,它的查询速度非常慢(大约 1 秒/300 条日志),并且经常会出现内存不足的情况。在我的查询中,一个表可以使用不同的 WHERE 条件进行多次查询。有没有办法优化一下?
SELECT
Waiting.w_waiting, Active.w_accept, Cancel.w_cancel,
Notwork.w_notwork,Inwork.w_inwork,Precheck.w_precheck,
Task.id,Task.case_id,Task.customer_id,Task.created,Task.interpreter_id,Task.high_light,Task.is_test,
Task.redo,Task.deliveryProduction,Task.accept_assign,Task.qc_checking_id,
Task.interpreter_id,Task.check_interpreter,Task.jobTitle,Task.amount,Task.isExpress,
Task.is_ready,Task.status,Task.vip_job,Task.is_final_assigned,Task.sub_status,
Task.jobInfo,Task.jobInfoProduction,Task.jobInfo_trans,Task.jobInfoProduction_trans,Task.customer_id,
Qc_waitcheck.waitcheck,Qc_done.qc_done,
Qc_ready.qc_ready,Qc_redo.qc_redo,Qc_redo_done.qc_redo_done,
W_inwork.inwork,Task.customer_workflow_id,Task.workflow_activated,Task.superqc,Task.is_temp_stop,
COALESCE(Upload_New, 0) AS Upload_New, COALESCE(Upload_Int, 0) AS Upload_Int, COALESCE(Upload_Ext, 0) AS Upload_Ext,
COALESCE(Upload_All, 0) AS Upload_All, COALESCE(Accepted_Files, 0) AS Accepted_Files, COALESCE(Check_Int, 0) AS Check_Int,
COALESCE(Check_Ext, 0) AS Check_Ext, COALESCE(All_Files, 0) AS All_Files
FROM tasks AS Task
LEFT JOIN staff_jobs AS SJ ON SJ.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_waiting, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Waiting ON Waiting.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_accept, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Active ON Active.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_cancel, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 0
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Cancel ON Cancel.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_notwork, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Notwork ON Notwork.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_inwork, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 1 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Inwork ON Inwork.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_precheck, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 3 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Precheck ON Precheck.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(StaffJob.id) AS inwork, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
WHERE StaffJob.status >= 3
GROUP BY StaffJob.task_id
) AS W_inwork ON W_inwork.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(StaffPic.id) AS waitcheck, StaffPic.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_pics AS StaffPic
WHERE StaffPic.status = 3
GROUP BY StaffPic.task_id
) AS Qc_waitcheck ON Qc_waitcheck.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(BRDONE.id) AS qc_done, BRDONE.task_id AS task_id
FROM br24dones AS BRDONE
WHERE BRDONE.rating IS NOT NULL AND BRDONE.rating > 0
GROUP BY BRDONE.task_id
) AS Qc_done ON Qc_done.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(BRDONE.id) AS qc_ready, BRDONE.task_id AS task_id
FROM br24dones AS BRDONE
WHERE BRDONE.is_ready = 1
GROUP BY BRDONE.task_id
) AS Qc_ready ON Qc_ready.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(StaffPic.id) AS qc_redo, StaffPic.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_pics AS StaffPic
WHERE StaffPic.redo > 0
GROUP BY StaffPic.task_id
) AS Qc_redo ON Qc_redo.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(StaffPic.id) AS qc_redo_done, StaffPic.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_pics AS StaffPic
WHERE StaffPic.redo > 0 AND StaffPic.status = 3
GROUP BY StaffPic.task_id
) AS Qc_redo_done ON Qc_redo_done.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT SUM(Upload_New) AS Upload_New, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(OP.id) AS Upload_New, OP.job_id AS task_id FROM outputs AS OP
GROUP BY OP.staff_job_id, OP.job_id) AS Upload_New
ON Upload_New.task_id = StaffJob.task_id
WHERE StaffJob.type = 0
GROUP BY StaffJob.task_id) AS Upload_New
ON Upload_New.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT SUM(Upload_Int) AS Upload_Int, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(OP.id) AS Upload_Int, OP.job_id AS task_id FROM outputs AS OP
GROUP BY OP.staff_job_id, OP.job_id) AS Upload_Int
ON Upload_Int.task_id = StaffJob.task_id
WHERE StaffJob.type = 1
GROUP BY StaffJob.task_id) AS Upload_Int
ON Upload_Int.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT SUM(Upload_Ext) AS Upload_Ext, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(OP.id) AS Upload_Ext, OP.job_id AS task_id FROM outputs AS OP
GROUP BY OP.staff_job_id, OP.job_id) AS Upload_Ext
ON Upload_Ext.task_id = StaffJob.task_id
WHERE StaffJob.type = 2
GROUP BY StaffJob.task_id) AS Upload_Ext
ON Upload_Ext.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT Upload_All AS Upload_All, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(OP.id) AS Upload_All, OP.job_id AS task_id FROM outputs AS OP
GROUP BY OP.job_id) AS Upload_All
ON Upload_All.task_id = StaffJob.task_id
) AS Upload_All
ON Upload_All.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(BR_CHECK.id) AS Accepted_Files, BR_CHECK.task_id AS task_id FROM br24dones AS BR_CHECK
WHERE BR_CHECK.intern_redo_id IS NULL AND BR_CHECK.extern_redo_id IS NULL GROUP BY BR_CHECK.task_id) AS CHECKING
ON CHECKING.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(BR_INT.id) AS Check_Int, BR_INT.task_id AS task_id FROM br24dones AS BR_INT
WHERE BR_INT.intern_redo_id IS NOT NULL GROUP BY BR_INT.task_id) AS INTERNAL
ON INTERNAL.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(BR_EXT.id) AS Check_Ext, BR_EXT.task_id AS task_id FROM br24dones AS BR_EXT
WHERE BR_EXT.extern_redo_id IS NOT NULL GROUP BY BR_EXT.task_id) AS EXTERNAL
ON EXTERNAL.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(BR_ALL.id) AS All_Files, BR_ALL.task_id AS task_id FROM br24dones AS BR_ALL
GROUP BY BR_ALL.task_id) AS DONE_ALL
ON DONE_ALL.task_id = Task.id GROUP BY Task.id
最佳答案
是的,很多。
您可以删除相当多的重复连接。只需加入一次,然后再进行分组。对于选择中的计数,您可以使用 if 语句来仅对具有正确状态的计数进行计数。
我没有信息也没有时间向您展示这一点,但您必须减少子查询。请记住,对于每一行,所有这些子查询都将被执行(如果子查询中有另一个子查询,这些数字可能会加起来很多。)
获取前几个连接
SELECT
Waiting.w_waiting, Active.w_accept, Cancel.w_cancel,
Notwork.w_notwork,Inwork.w_inwork,Precheck.w_precheck,
Task.id,Task.case_id,Task.customer_id,Task.created,Task.interpreter_id,Task.high_light,Task.is_test,
Task.redo,Task.deliveryProduction,Task.accept_assign,Task.qc_checking_id,
Task.interpreter_id,Task.check_interpreter,Task.jobTitle,Task.amount,Task.isExpress,
Task.is_ready,Task.status,Task.vip_job,Task.is_final_assigned,Task.sub_status,
Task.jobInfo,Task.jobInfoProduction,Task.jobInfo_trans,Task.jobInfoProduction_trans,Task.customer_id,
Qc_waitcheck.waitcheck,Qc_done.qc_done,
Qc_ready.qc_ready,Qc_redo.qc_redo,Qc_redo_done.qc_redo_done,
W_inwork.inwork,Task.customer_workflow_id,Task.workflow_activated,Task.superqc,Task.is_temp_stop,
COALESCE(Upload_New, 0) AS Upload_New, COALESCE(Upload_Int, 0) AS Upload_Int, COALESCE(Upload_Ext, 0) AS Upload_Ext,
COALESCE(Upload_All, 0) AS Upload_All, COALESCE(Accepted_Files, 0) AS Accepted_Files, COALESCE(Check_Int, 0) AS Check_Int,
COALESCE(Check_Ext, 0) AS Check_Ext, COALESCE(All_Files, 0) AS All_Files
FROM tasks AS Task
LEFT JOIN staff_jobs AS SJ ON SJ.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_waiting, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Waiting ON Waiting.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_accept, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Active ON Active.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_cancel, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 0
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Cancel ON Cancel.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_notwork, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Notwork ON Notwork.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_inwork, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 1 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Inwork ON Inwork.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(SJ.id) AS w_precheck, SJ.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS SJ
WHERE SJ.status = 3 AND SJ.actived = 1
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
) AS Precheck ON Precheck.task_id = Task.id
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT COUNT(StaffJob.id) AS inwork, StaffJob.task_id AS task_id
FROM staff_jobs AS StaffJob
WHERE StaffJob.status >= 3
GROUP BY StaffJob.task_id
) AS W_inwork ON W_inwork.task_id = Task.id
这可以简化为:
SELECT
*,
COALESCE(Upload_New, 0) AS Upload_New, COALESCE(Upload_Int, 0) AS Upload_Int, COALESCE(Upload_Ext, 0) AS Upload_Ext,
COALESCE(Upload_All, 0) AS Upload_All, COALESCE(Accepted_Files, 0) AS Accepted_Files, COALESCE(Check_Int, 0) AS Check_Int,
COALESCE(Check_Ext, 0) AS Check_Ext, COALESCE(All_Files, 0) AS All_Files,
SUM(IF(SJ.is_waiting = 1)) AS w_waiting,
SUM(IF(SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1)) AS w_accept,
SUM(IF(SJ.is_waiting = 0 AND SJ.actived = 0)) AS w_cancel,
SUM(IF(SJ.status = 0 AND SJ.actived = 1)) AS w_notwork,
SUM(IF(SJ.status = 1 AND SJ.actived = 1)) AS w_inwork,
SUM(IF(SJ.status = 3 AND SJ.actived = 1)) AS w_precheck,
SUM(IF(SJ.status >= 1)) AS inwork
FROM tasks AS Task
LEFT JOIN staff_jobs AS SJ ON SJ.task_id = Task.id
GROUP BY SJ.task_id
这会删除 6 个子查询,它们都请求相同的数据。
也可以对请求的其他表执行此操作
关于mysql - 性能MySQL,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39078172/
在这段令人惊叹的视频 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udix3GZouik ) 中,Alex Blom 谈到了 Ember 在移动世界中的“黑客攻击”。 在 22
我们希望通过我们的应用收集使用情况统计信息。因此,我们希望在服务器端的某个地方跟踪用户操作。 就性能而言,哪个选项更合适: 在 App Engine 请求日志中跟踪用户操作。即为每个用户操作写入一个日
在针对对象集合的 LINQ 查询的幕后究竟发生了什么?它只是语法糖还是发生了其他事情使其更有效的查询? 最佳答案 您是指查询表达式,还是查询在幕后的作用? 查询表达式首先扩展为“普通”C#。例如: v
我正在构建一个简单的照片库应用程序,它在列表框中显示图像。 xaml 是:
对于基于 Web 的企业应用程序,使用“静态 Hashmap 存储对象” 和 apache java 缓存系统有何优缺点?哪一个最有利于性能并减少堆内存问题 例如: Map store=Applica
我想知道在性能方面存储类变量的最佳方式是什么。我的意思是,由于 Children() 函数,存储一个 div id 比查找所有其他类名更好。还是把类名写在变量里比较好? 例如这样: var $inne
我已经阅读了所有这些关于 cassandra 有多快的文章,例如单行读取可能需要大约 5 毫秒。 到目前为止,我不太关心我的网站速度,但是随着网站变得越来越大,一些页面开始需要相当多的查询,例如一个页
最近,我在缓存到内存缓存之前的查询一直需要很长时间才能处理!在这个例子中,它花费了 10 秒。在这种情况下,我要做的就是获得 10 个最近的点击。 我感觉它加载了所有 125,592 行然后只返回 1
我找了几篇文章(包括SA中的一些问题),试图找到基本操作的成本。 但是,我尝试制作自己的小程序,以便自己进行测试。在尝试测试加法和减法时,我遇到了一些问题,我用简单的代码向您展示了这一点
这个问题在这里已经有了答案: Will Java app slow down by presence of -Xdebug or only when stepping through code? (
我记得很久以前读过 with() 对 JavaScript 有一些严重的性能影响,因为它可能对范围堆栈进行非确定性更改。我很难找到最近对此的讨论。这仍然是真的吗? 最佳答案 与其说 with 对性能有
我们有一个数据仓库,其中包含非规范化表,行数从 50 万行到 6 多万行不等。我正在开发一个报告解决方案,因此出于性能原因我们正在使用数据库分页。我们的报告有搜索条件,并且我们已经创建了必要的索引,但
我有一条有效的 SQL 语句,但需要很长时间才能处理 我有一个 a_log 表和一个 people 表。我需要在 people 表中找到给定人员的每个 ID 的最后一个事件和关联的用户。 SELECT
很难说出这里问的是什么。这个问题是含糊的、模糊的、不完整的、过于宽泛的或修辞性的,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开它,visit the help center 。 已关
通常当我建立一个站点时,我将所有的 CSS 放在一个文件中,并且一次性定义与一组元素相关的所有属性。像这样: #myElement { color: #fff; background-
两者之间是否存在任何性能差异: p { margin:0px; padding:0px; } 并省略最后的分号: p { margin:0px; padding:0px } 提前致谢!
我的应用程序 (PHP) 需要执行大量高精度数学运算(甚至可能出现一共100个数字) 通过这个论坛的最后几篇帖子,我发现我必须使用任何高精度库,如 BC Math 或 GMP,因为 float 类型不
我一直在使用 javamail 从 IMAP 服务器(目前是 GMail)检索邮件。 Javamail 非常快速地从服务器检索特定文件夹中的消息列表(仅 id),但是当我实际获取消息(仅包含甚至不包含
我非常渴望开发我的第一个 Ruby 应用程序,因为我的公司终于在内部批准了它的使用。 在我读到的关于 Ruby v1.8 之前的所有内容中,从来没有任何关于性能的正面评价,但我没有发现关于 1.9 版
我是 Redis 的新手,我有一个包含数百万个成员(member) ID、电子邮件和用户名的数据集,并且正在考虑将它们存储在例如列表结构中。我认为 list 和 sorted set 可能最适合我的情
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!