bash - "correct"的最简单方法是意外使用 mv 而不是 hg mv？

Question

我有一个跟踪的foo。现在，因为我心不在焉，所以我跑了:

mv foo bar

现在，当我执行 hg st 时，我得到:

! foo
? bar

我想追溯修复这个问题——就好像我做了一个hg mv foo bar。

现在，我可以编写一个 bash 脚本来为我完成这些工作 - 但我可以做一些更好/更简单/更智能的事情吗？

Answer 1

使用 --after 选项:hg mv --after foo bar

$ hg mv --help
hg rename [OPTION]... SOURCE... DEST

aliases: move, mv

rename files; equivalent of copy + remove

    Mark dest as copies of sources; mark sources for deletion. If dest is a
    directory, copies are put in that directory. If dest is a file, there can
    only be one source.

    By default, this command copies the contents of files as they exist in the
    working directory. If invoked with -A/--after, the operation is recorded,
    but no copying is performed.

    This command takes effect at the next commit. To undo a rename before
    that, see 'hg revert'.

    Returns 0 on success, 1 if errors are encountered.

options ([+] can be repeated):

 -A --after               record a rename that has already occurred
 -f --force               forcibly copy over an existing managed file
 -I --include PATTERN [+] include names matching the given patterns
 -X --exclude PATTERN [+] exclude names matching the given patterns
 -n --dry-run             do not perform actions, just print output
    --mq                  operate on patch repository

(some details hidden, use --verbose to show complete help)