gpt4 book ai didi

python - 比较两个不同大小的矩阵以形成一个大矩阵 - 速度改进?

转载 作者:太空宇宙 更新时间:2023-11-04 03:12:20 28 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我有两个矩阵,我需要用它们来创建一个更大的矩阵。每个矩阵只是一个被读取的制表符分隔的文本文件。每个矩阵有 48 个列,每个矩阵具有相同的标识符,但行数不同。第一个矩阵是 108887x48,第二个是 55482x48。对于每个矩阵,每个位置的条目可以是 0 或 1,因此是二进制的。最终输出应该将第一个矩阵行 ID 作为行,将第二个矩阵行 ID 作为列,因此最终矩阵为 55482x10887。

这里需要发生的是,对于第一个矩阵中每一行的每个pos,对于第二个矩阵中的每一行,如果每个矩阵的pos(col)为1,那么最终的矩阵计数将增加1 . 最终矩阵中任意pos可以取的最高值是48,预计会剩下0的。

例子:

mat1
A B C D
1id1 0 1 0 1
1id2 1 1 0 0
1id3 1 1 1 1
1id4 0 0 1 0

mat2
A B C D
2id1 1 1 0 0
2id2 0 1 1 0
2id3 1 1 1 1
2id4 1 0 1 0

final
2id1 2id2 2id3 2id4
1id1 1 1 2 0
1id2 2 1 2 1
1id3 2 2 4 2
1id4 0 1 1 1

我有执行此操作的代码,但速度慢得令人痛苦,这是我主要寻求帮助的地方。我试图尽可能地加快算法的速度。它已经运行了 24 小时,并且只完成了大约 25%。我之前已经让它跑完了,最终输出文件是20GB。我没有使用数据库的经验,并且可以在这里实现它,如果有人可以通过下面的代码片段帮助我如何做到这一点。

#!/usr/bin/env python

import sys

mat1in = sys.argv[1]
mat2in = sys.argv[2]

print '\n######################################################################################'
print 'Generating matrix by counts from smaller matrices.'
print '########################################################################################\n'

with open(mat1in, 'r') as f:
cols = [''] + next(f).strip().split('\t') # First line of matrix is composed of 48 cols
mat1 = [line.strip().split('\t') for line in f] # Each line in matrix = 'ID': 0 or 1 per col id

with open(mat2in, 'r') as f:
next(f) # Skip first row, col IDs are taken from mat1
mat2 = [line.strip().split('\t') for line in f] # Each line in matrix = 'ID': 0 or 1 per col id

out = open('final_matrix.txt', 'w') # Output file

#matrix = []
header = [] # Final matrix header
header.append('') # Add blank as first char in large matrix header
for i in mat2:
header.append(i[0]) # Composed of all mat2 row ids
#matrix.append(header)

print >> out, '\t'.join(header) # First print header to output file

print '\nTotal mat1 rows: ' + str(len(mat1)) # Get total mat1 rows
print 'Total mat2 rows: ' + str(len(mat2)), '\n' # Get total mat2 rows
print 'Progress: ' # Progress updated as each mat1 id is read

length = len(header) # Length of header, i.e. total number of mat2 ids
totmat1 = len(mat1) # Length of rows (-header), i.e. total number of mat1 ids

total = 0 # Running total - for progress meter
for h in mat1: # Loop through all mat1 ids - each row in the HC matrix
row = [] # Empty list for new row for large matrix
row.append(h[0]) # Append mat1 id, as first item in each row
for i in xrange(length-1): # For length of large matrix header (add 0 to each row) - header -1 for first '\t'
row.extend('0')
for n in xrange(1,49): # Loop through each col id
for k in mat2: # For every row in mat2
if int(h[n]) == 1 and int(k[n]) == 1: # If the pos (count for that particular col id) is 1 from mat1 and mat2 matrix;
pos = header.index(k[0]) # Get the position of the mat2 id
row[pos] = str(int(row[pos]) + 1) # Add 1 to current position in row - [i][j] = [mat1_id][mat2_id]
print >> out, '\t'.join(row) # When row is completed (All columns are compared from both mat1 and mat2 matrices; print final row to large matrix
total += 1 # Update running total
sys.stdout.write('\r\t' + str(total) + '/' + str(tvh)) # Print progress to screen
sys.stdout.flush()

print '\n######################################################################################'
print 'Matrix complete.'
print '########################################################################################\n'

这是对 mat1 中的 id 的前 30 次迭代进行分析的内容:

######################################################################################
Generating matrix by counts from smaller matrices.
########################################################################################


Total mat1 rows: 108887
Total mat2 rows: 55482

Progress:
30/108887^C 2140074 function calls in 101.234 seconds

Ordered by: standard name

ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 70.176 70.176 101.234 101.234 build_matrix.py:3(<module>)
4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 {len}
55514 0.006 0.000 0.006 0.000 {method 'append' of 'list' objects}
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 {method 'disable' of '_lsprof.Profiler' objects}
1719942 1.056 0.000 1.056 0.000 {method 'extend' of 'list' objects}
30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 {method 'flush' of 'file' objects}
35776 29.332 0.001 29.332 0.001 {method 'index' of 'list' objects}
31 0.037 0.001 0.037 0.001 {method 'join' of 'str' objects}
164370 0.589 0.000 0.589 0.000 {method 'split' of 'str' objects}
164370 0.033 0.000 0.033 0.000 {method 'strip' of 'str' objects}
30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 {method 'write' of 'file' objects}
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 {next}
3 0.004 0.001 0.004 0.001 {open}

我还为每次迭代计时,每个 mat1 id 大约需要 2.5-3 秒,如果我是正确的,则需要大约 90 小时才能完成整个过程。这是关于从头到尾运行整个脚本所花费的时间。

我编辑了一些主要部分,删除了通过附加和 xrange 生成行,通过将“0”乘以标题的长度来一步生成列表。我还用索引作为值制作了一个 mat2 id 的字典,认为 dict 查找会比索引更快..

headdict = {}
for k,v in enumerate(header):
headdict[v] = k

total = 0 # Running total - for progress meter
for h in mat1: # Loop through all mat1 ids - each row in the HC matrix
timestart = time.clock()
row = [h[0]] + ['0']*(length-1) # Empty list for new row for large matrix
#row.append(h[0]) # Append mat1 id, as first item in each row
#for i in xrange(length-1): # For length of large matrix header (add 0 to each row) - header -1 for first '\t'
# row.append('0')
for n in xrange(1,49): # Loop through each col id
for k in mat2: # For every row in mat2
if int(h[n]) == 1 and int(k[n]) == 1: # If the pos (count for that particular col id) is 1 from mat1 and mat2 matrix;
pos = headdict[k[0]] #header.index(k[0]) # Get the position of the mat2 id
row[pos] = str(int(row[pos]) + 1) # Add 1 to current position in row - [i][j] = [mat1_id][mat2_id]
print >> out, '\t'.join(row) # When row is completed (All columns are compared from both mat1 and mat2 matrices; print final row to large matrix
total += 1 # Update running total
sys.stdout.write('\r\t' + str(total) + '/' + str(totmat1)) # Print progress to screen
#sys.stdout.flush()
timeend = time.clock()
print timestart - timeend

最佳答案

这只是一个矩阵乘法。您想要将第一个矩阵乘以第二个矩阵的转置。对于高效的矩阵运算,得到 NumPy .

如果您将两个输入矩阵读入 dtype numpy.int8 的 NumPy 数组,那么计算很简单

m1.dot(m2.T)

最多需要几分钟。

关于python - 比较两个不同大小的矩阵以形成一个大矩阵 - 速度改进?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37618611/

28 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com