- android - 多次调用 OnPrimaryClipChangedListener
- android - 无法更新 RecyclerView 中的 TextView 字段
- android.database.CursorIndexOutOfBoundsException : Index 0 requested, 光标大小为 0
- android - 使用 AppCompat 时,我们是否需要明确指定其 UI 组件(Spinner、EditText)颜色
我知道在本质上,Python 集和 Python 字典非常相似。阅读他们各自的来源 - dict 和 set - 很明显他们的查找几乎相同。在阅读 this answer 时,我决定通过将以下模型组合在一起来测试作者的主张“集合查找比字典查找更快”:
from timeit import timeit
import random
universe = range(1,100000)
keys = random.sample(universe, 50000)
lookups = random.sample(universe, 50000)
dict_set = dict((k,True) for k in keys)
set_set = set(keys)
def dict_lookup():
for l in lookups:
l in dict_set
def set_lookup():
for l in lookups:
l in set_set
if __name__ == '__main__':
set_victories = 0
dict_victories = 0
for i in range(100):
dict_time = timeit('dict_lookup()', setup="from __main__ import dict_lookup", number=10000)
set_time = timeit('set_lookup()', setup="from __main__ import set_lookup", number=10000)
print("dict time: {}".format(dict_time))
print("set time: {}".format(set_time))
if set_time < dict_time:
set_victories += 1
else:
dict_victories += 1
print("Sets were faster in {} trials".format(set_victories))
print("Dicts were faster in {} trials".format(dict_victories))
预期的结果是,考虑到集合查找和字典查找的实现,它们的性能将没有区别。我实际发现的是以下最终结果:
$ python3 --version
Python 3.4.5
$ python3 sets-vs-dicts.py
<snip - see below for full output>
Sets were faster in 2 trials
Dicts were faster in 98 trials
所以字典实际上始终比集合更快。当然,我并不是建议我们都应该放弃集合并使用更快的字典,因为集合使程序员的意图更加清晰,并且考虑到测试的规模,差异小得可怜。然而,我确实发现这个结果非常奇怪。这是怎么回事?
如果您好奇,完整输出如下:
$ python3 set-vs-dict.py
dict time: 57.754860900342464
set time: 56.8056653002277
dict time: 50.8890880998224
set time: 50.642351899296045
dict time: 49.936297399923205
set time: 50.66272980067879
dict time: 49.92973940074444
set time: 50.65518939960748
dict time: 49.949383799917996
set time: 50.66877659969032
dict time: 49.93578719999641
set time: 50.64872649963945
dict time: 49.96432110015303
set time: 50.676835800521076
dict time: 49.95099350064993
set time: 50.64867010060698
dict time: 49.98275039996952
set time: 50.648987299762666
dict time: 49.92164439987391
set time: 50.66931669972837
dict time: 49.98953749984503
set time: 50.652459900826216
dict time: 49.95234560035169
set time: 50.65124330017716
dict time: 49.98174169939011
set time: 50.6712632002309
dict time: 49.93824000004679
set time: 50.65437529981136
dict time: 49.95089349988848
set time: 50.65370349958539
dict time: 49.963413699530065
set time: 50.65550949983299
dict time: 49.955208600498736
set time: 50.66121090017259
dict time: 49.94347499962896
set time: 50.64449250046164
dict time: 49.95420549996197
set time: 50.66687630023807
dict time: 49.92143050022423
set time: 50.64667259994894
dict time: 50.05037229973823
set time: 50.67966340016574
dict time: 49.93846719991416
set time: 50.64651320036501
dict time: 49.921281000599265
set time: 50.67906459979713
dict time: 49.942994699813426
set time: 50.65166569966823
dict time: 49.94313340075314
set time: 50.656177499331534
dict time: 49.94610709976405
set time: 50.65122799947858
dict time: 49.93874369934201
set time: 50.661101600155234
dict time: 49.94996269978583
set time: 50.63938449975103
dict time: 49.9602530002594
set time: 50.65474760066718
dict time: 49.91891669947654
set time: 50.663624899461865
dict time: 49.959330099634826
set time: 50.653377699665725
dict time: 49.98555530048907
set time: 50.64655719976872
dict time: 49.945239200256765
set time: 50.65128379967064
dict time: 49.95342260040343
set time: 50.65899199992418
dict time: 49.92802210059017
set time: 50.67100259941071
dict time: 49.942902400158346
set time: 50.74889140017331
dict time: 49.994800799526274
set time: 50.731577299535275
dict time: 49.98310230020434
set time: 50.747778999619186
dict time: 49.99376400001347
set time: 50.73122859932482
dict time: 50.00640409998596
set time: 50.68737949989736
dict time: 49.94556000083685
set time: 50.722481600008905
dict time: 49.98192979954183
set time: 50.72525530029088
dict time: 49.99698970001191
set time: 50.736096899956465
dict time: 49.94320739991963
set time: 50.71096289996058
dict time: 49.972679699771106
set time: 50.71838010009378
dict time: 49.957800599746406
set time: 50.747396499849856
dict time: 49.97235369961709
set time: 50.69941039942205
dict time: 49.951399500481784
set time: 50.647985899820924
dict time: 49.94027389958501
set time: 50.66828709933907
dict time: 49.94174600020051
set time: 50.65279300045222
dict time: 49.96716000046581
set time: 50.64943030010909
dict time: 49.95117200072855
set time: 50.65525580011308
dict time: 49.962328700348735
set time: 50.66319840028882
dict time: 49.960031100548804
set time: 50.672181099653244
dict time: 49.93908840045333
set time: 50.651302699930966
dict time: 49.94130470044911
set time: 50.655242399312556
dict time: 50.04310019966215
set time: 50.67391949985176
dict time: 49.93010629992932
set time: 50.64970660023391
dict time: 49.991717299446464
set time: 50.65591560024768
dict time: 49.952454400248826
set time: 50.649492600001395
dict time: 49.92677689995617
set time: 50.635977199301124
dict time: 49.95432769972831
set time: 50.64075019955635
dict time: 49.94808299932629
set time: 50.664196100085974
dict time: 49.966013699769974
set time: 50.649582100100815
dict time: 49.9813024001196
set time: 50.64982909988612
dict time: 49.93897459935397
set time: 50.66509110014886
dict time: 49.95878900028765
set time: 50.649003400467336
dict time: 49.96674569975585
set time: 50.69693780038506
dict time: 49.91303739976138
set time: 50.675189800560474
dict time: 49.950330699793994
set time: 50.64532170072198
dict time: 49.95022019930184
set time: 50.65448010060936
dict time: 49.95197269972414
set time: 50.65391890052706
dict time: 49.94361769966781
set time: 50.67086180020124
dict time: 49.95455109979957
set time: 50.670443600043654
dict time: 49.94633509963751
set time: 50.65955980028957
dict time: 49.967472000047565
set time: 50.66301089990884
dict time: 49.95830660033971
set time: 50.67482869978994
dict time: 49.984512499533594
set time: 50.67321899998933
dict time: 50.01141999941319
set time: 50.84260869957507
dict time: 50.31206789985299
set time: 51.02959220018238
dict time: 50.28449110034853
set time: 51.03110689949244
dict time: 50.303432799875736
set time: 51.02032170072198
dict time: 50.281682999804616
set time: 51.05188430007547
dict time: 50.30898350011557
set time: 51.01742030028254
dict time: 50.3027657000348
set time: 51.02114639990032
dict time: 50.00038649979979
set time: 50.65360379964113
dict time: 49.93306410033256
set time: 50.63413709960878
dict time: 49.95266539976001
set time: 50.65499630011618
dict time: 49.94854210037738
set time: 50.703547400422394
dict time: 49.96691229939461
set time: 50.69470370002091
dict time: 49.95223430078477
set time: 50.70982529968023
dict time: 49.954243999905884
set time: 50.791720499284565
dict time: 49.97948960028589
set time: 50.69436000008136
dict time: 49.98102519940585
set time: 50.73820179980248
dict time: 49.96782180014998
set time: 50.722959300503135
dict time: 49.9863857999444
set time: 50.70789400022477
dict time: 49.9592831004411
set time: 50.707397900521755
dict time: 49.94034240022302
set time: 50.667025099508464
dict time: 49.96215169969946
set time: 50.72984409984201
dict time: 49.98776920046657
set time: 50.72097889985889
Sets were faster in 2 trials
Dicts were faster in 98 trials
最佳答案
当我测试你的代码时,我认为这些数字可能有点小。所以我将它们增加了 10 倍,并让 random.sample 在 100 个数字中的比例为 1。
import random
from time import time
def timeit(func):
def wrap(*args):
start = time()
result = func(*args)
return time()-start
return wrap
def get_set_and_dict():
universe = range(1, 10**8)
keys = random.sample(universe, 10**6)
lookups = random.sample(universe,10**6)
dict_set = dict((k,True) for k in keys)
set_set = set(keys)
return dict_set, set_set, lookups
@timeit
def test(container, lookups):
for i in lookups:
a = i in container
def main():
dict_set, set_set, lookups = get_set_and_dict()
acc_set = acc_dict = 0
rounds = 100
for _ in range(rounds):
acc_dict += test(dict_set, lookups)
acc_set += test(set_set, lookups)
print("Set time: {:.4f}s\n Dict time: {:.4f}s".format(acc_set/rounds, acc_dict/rounds))
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
>> Set time: 0.1263s
>> Dict time: 0.1578s
但是如果 set 和 dict 有所不同,那就有意义了,因为即使相似,它们也不是同一件事。
<小时/>也许仅仅取决于您如何设置实验,结论就会有所不同。
关于python - 为什么使用字典测试包含比使用集合测试更快?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40633006/
我有一个类似于以下的结构。 class A { string title; List bItem; } class B { int pric
本地流 和 远程流 两者都是“媒体流列表 ”。 本地流 包含“本地媒体流 ” 对象 但是,远程流 包含“媒体流 ” 对象 为什么差别这么大? 当我使用“本地流 “- 这个对我有用: localVide
我正在尝试将 8 列虚拟变量转换为 8 级排名的一列。 我试图用这个公式来做到这一点: =IF(OR(A1="1");"1";IF(OR(B1="1");"2";IF(OR(C1="1");"3";I
我正在使用面向对象编程在 Python 中创建一个有点复杂的棋盘游戏的实现。 我的问题是,许多这些对象应该能够与其他对象交互,即使它们不包含在其中。 例如Game是一个对象,其中包含PointTrac
有没有办法获取与 contains 语句匹配的最深元素? 基本上,如果我有嵌套的 div,我想要最后一个元素而不是父元素: Needle $("div:contains('Needle')")
出于某种原因,我无法在 Google 上找到答案!但是使用 SQL contains 函数我怎么能告诉它从字符串的开头开始,即我正在寻找等同于的全文 喜欢 'some_term%'。 我知道我可以使用
我正在尝试创建一个正则表达式来匹配具有 3 个或更多元音的字符串。 我试过这个: [aeiou]{3,} 但它仅在元音按顺序排列时才有效。有什么建议吗? 例如: 塞缪尔 -> 有效 琼 -> 无效 S
嘿所以我遇到了这样的情况,我从数据库中拉回一个客户,并通过包含的方式包含所有案例研究 return (from c in db.Clients.Include("CaseStudies")
如果关键字是子字符串,我无法弄清楚为什么这个函数不返回结果。 const string = 'cake'; const substring = 'cak'; console.log(string.in
我正在尝试将包含特定文本字符串的任何元素更改为红色。在我的示例中,我可以将子元素变为蓝色,但是我编写“替换我”行的方式有些不正确;红色不会发生变化。我注意到“contains”方法通常写为 :cont
我想问一下我是否可以要求/包含一个语法错误的文件,如果不能,则require/include返回一个值,这样我就知道所需/包含的文件存在语法错误并且不能被要求/包含? file.php语法错误 inc
我想为所有包含youtube链接的链接添加一个rel。 这就是我正在使用的东西-但它没有用。有任何想法吗? $('a [href:contains(“youtube.com”)]')。attr('re
我正在尝试在 Elasticsearch 中查询。除搜索中出现“/”外,此功能均正常运行。查询如下所示 GET styling_rules/product_line_filters/_search {
我正在开发名为eBookRepository的ASP.NET MVC应用程序,其中包含在线图书。 电子书具有自己的标题,作者等。因此,现在我正在尝试实现搜索机制。我必须使用Elasticsearch作
我已阅读Firebase Documentation并且不明白什么是 .contains()。 以下是文档中 Firebase 数据库的示例规则: { "rules": { "rooms"
我的问题是我可以给出条件[ 'BookTitleMaster.id' => $xtitid, ] 如下所示 $bbookinfs = $this->BookStockin->BookIssue->fi
我需要能够使用 | 检查模式在他们中。例如,对于像“dtest|test”这样的字符串,像 d*|*t 这样的表达式应该返回 true。 我不是正则表达式英雄,所以我只是尝试了一些事情,例如: Reg
我想创建一个正则表达式来不匹配某些单词... 我的字符:var test = "é123rr;and;ià456;or;456543" 我的正则表达式:test.match(\((?!and)(?!o
我在 XSLT 中有一个名为 variable_name 的变量,如果相关产品具有名称为 A 或 B 或两者均为 A & 的属性,我将尝试将其设置为 1 B.
您好,我想让接待员和经理能够查看工作类型和费率并随后进行更新。但是技术人员只能查看不能更新。该图是否有效? 我读到扩展用例是由发起基本用例的参与者发起的。我应该如何区分技术人员只能启动基本案例而不能启
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!