c# - N 个静态字段与单个静态实例

Question

我正在研究单例格式，它与我以前使用的非常相似。

我的问题是，这两种方法在内存和/或性能方面是否存在差异？第二种选择是否更快，足以弥补其更大的写入和读取使用量？

示例代码:

方法一

public static class TheSomething {
    public static String Title;
    public static String Description;
    public static String HowIsIt;
    public static int TimesSeenCount;
    public static List<Long> PeopleWhoSawIt;
    public static List<Session> PeopleSeeingIt;

    // now some math mumbo jumbo just to increase the memsize of this:
    public static double posX;
    public static double posY
    public static double posZ;
    public static double velX;
    public static double velY;
    public static double velZ;
    public static double accX;
    public static double accY;
    public static double accZ;
    public static double rotX;
    public static double rotY;
    public static double rotZ;
    public static double rotVelX;
    public static double rotVelY;
    public static double rotVelZ;
    public static double rotAccX;
    public static double rotAccY;
    public static double rotAccZ;
    public static List<Vertex> Geometry;
}

用于:

++TheSomething.PeopleWhoSawIt;

方法二

public static class TheSomething {
    private static TheSomething _instance;
    public static Instance { 
        get {
            if(_instance == null)
                _instance = new TheSomething();
        } private set {
            _instance = value;
        }
    }
    private TheSomething() {}
    public String Title;
    public String Description;
    public String HowIsIt;
    public int TimesSeenCount;
    public List<Long> PeopleWhoSawIt;
    public List<Session> PeopleSeeingIt;

    // now some math mumbo jumbo just to increase the memsize of this:
    public double posX;
    public double posY
    public double posZ;
    public double velX;
    public double velY;
    public double velZ;
    public double accX;
    public double accY;
    public double accZ;
    public double rotX;
    public double rotY;
    public double rotZ;
    public double rotVelX;
    public double rotVelY;
    public double rotVelZ;
    public double rotAccX;
    public double rotAccY;
    public double rotAccZ;
    public List<Vertex> Geometry;
}

用于:

++TheSomething.Instance.PeopleWhoSawIt;

Answer 1

就性能而言，这两种选择都不会给您带来实质性的改进。它们属于微优化范围，不会对现实场景产生太大影响(如果有的话)。

从设计的角度来看，这两个选项都非常糟糕，第一个尤其邪恶。一般来说，单例模式不受欢迎，因为开发人员倾向于滥用和忽视与之相关的各种副作用，例如占用内存或资源或缺乏多线程支持。

如果您仍然需要该类的单个实例，请尝试使用依赖注入(inject)容器而不是将类本身设计为单例。