mysql - 更快地执行 'WHERE IN (SELECT)' 或 'WHERE x = (SELECT)'

Question

哪种选择语句更好？

SELECT *
FROM  aTable
WHERE aField in (
    SELECT xField 
    FROM   bTable
    WHERE  yField > 5
);

或

SELECT *
FROM  aTable
WHERE (
    SELECT yField
    FROM   bTable
    WHERE  aTable.aField = bTable.xField
) > 5;

Answer 1

它们生成非常相似的执行计划(在我的测试表上，它们很小；YMMV，始终分析真实数据)，您可能需要考虑第三种替代方案:

第一个:

EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM aTable WHERE aField in (SELECT xField FROM bTable WHERE yField > 5);

+----+--------------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+-------------+| id | select_type        | table  | type  | possible_keys | key           | key_len | ref  | rows | Extra       |+----+--------------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+-------------+|  1 | PRIMARY            | aTable | ALL   | NULL          | NULL          | NULL    | NULL |    4 | Using where ||  2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | bTable | range | bTable_yField | bTable_yField | 5       | NULL |    2 | Using where |+----+--------------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+-------------+

The second:

EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM aTable WHERE (SELECT yField FROM bTable WHERE aTable.aField = bTable.xField) > 5;

+----+--------------------+--------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+| id | select_type        | table  | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | Extra       |+----+--------------------+--------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+|  1 | PRIMARY            | aTable | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    4 | Using where ||  2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | bTable | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    4 | Using where |+----+--------------------+--------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+

Both result in a dependent subquery; on my example tables, the first one gets the benefit of the index (I assume bTable.yField is indexed) while the second doesn't.

You can avoid the dependent subquery and get better up-front filtering using a JOIN:

The third alternative:

EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM aTable INNER JOIN bTable On aTable.aField = bTable.xField WHERE bTable.yField > 5;

+----+-------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------------+| id | select_type | table  | type  | possible_keys | key           | key_len | ref  | rows | Extra                          |+----+-------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | bTable | range | bTable_yField | bTable_yField | 5       | NULL |    2 | Using where                    ||  1 | SIMPLE      | aTable | ALL   | NULL          | NULL          | NULL    | NULL |    4 | Using where; Using join buffer |+----+-------------+--------+-------+---------------+---------------+---------+------+------+--------------------------------+

同样，您确实必须使用您的 架构和您的 具有代表性的真实世界数据进行分析，因为优化器可能会做出不同的决定。

在 this excellent article 中对这些技术进行了更多比较通过 quassnoi .

---

作为引用，下面是我如何创建 aTable 和 bTable(因为您没有提供定义)并测试您的查询:

mysql> CREATE TABLE aTable (aField INT, aMore VARCHAR(200));Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)mysql> CREATE TABLE bTable (xField INT, yField INT);Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)mysql> INSERT INTO aTable (aField, aMore) VALUES (1, 'One'), (2, 'Two'), (3, 'Three'), (4, 'Four');Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.00 sec)Records: 4  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0mysql> INSERT INTO bTable (xField, yField) VALUES (1, 10), (2, 2), (3, 20), (4, 4);Query OK, 4 rows affected (0.02 sec)Records: 4  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0mysql> CREATE INDEX bTable_yField ON bTable(yField);Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)Records: 0  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0mysql> SELECT * FROM aTable WHERE aField in (SELECT xField FROM bTable WHERE yField > 5);+--------+-------+| aField | aMore |+--------+-------+|      1 | One   ||      3 | Three |+--------+-------+2 rows in set (0.00 sec)mysql> SELECT * FROM aTable WHERE (SELECT yField FROM bTable WHERE aTable.aField = bTable.xField) > 5;+--------+-------+| aField | aMore |+--------+-------+|      1 | One   ||      3 | Three |+--------+-------+2 rows in set (0.00 sec)