- iOS/Objective-C 元类和类别
- objective-c - -1001 错误,当 NSURLSession 通过 httpproxy 和/etc/hosts
- java - 使用网络类获取 url 地址
- ios - 推送通知中不播放声音
我正在寻找以下并发语义的 Java 实现。我想要类似于 ReadWriteLock
的东西,除了对称的,即读和写端可以在许多线程之间共享,但读不包括写,反之亦然。
是否有实现此目的的现有库类?目前,我已经用 ReadWriteLock
近似实现了所需的功能,因为幸运的是,在锁 B 的上下文中完成的任务比较少见。不过,这感觉像是一个 hack,它可能会影响我的程序在重负载下的性能。
最佳答案
在标准库中,没有您需要的东西。
要轻松实现自定义 Lock
,您应该子类化或委托(delegate)给 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer .
以下代码是 non-fair 的示例实现您需要的锁,包括一些(非耗尽的)测试。我将其命名为 LeftRightLock,因为您的要求的二进制性质。
这个概念非常简单:
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer
公开了一种使用 Compare and swap 以原子方式设置 int
状态的方法习语 ( compareAndSetState(int expect, int update) ),我们可以使用暴露状态来保持持有锁的线程数,将其设置为正值以防 Right
锁被持有或设置为负值以防万一Left
锁被持有。
我们只需确保以下条件:- 只有当内部 AbstractQueuedSynchronizer
的状态为 0
或负数时,您才能锁定 Left
- 仅当内部AbstractQueuedSynchronizer
的状态为零
或正数
Right
LeftRightLock.java
import java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
/**
* A binary mutex with the following properties:
*
* Exposes two different {@link Lock}s: LEFT, RIGHT.
*
* When LEFT is held other threads can acquire LEFT but thread trying to acquire RIGHT will be
* blocked. When RIGHT is held other threads can acquire RIGHT but thread trying to acquire LEFT
* will be blocked.
*/
public class LeftRightLock {
public static final int ACQUISITION_FAILED = -1;
public static final int ACQUISITION_SUCCEEDED = 1;
private final LeftRightSync sync = new LeftRightSync();
public void lockLeft() {
sync.acquireShared(LockSide.LEFT.getV());
}
public void lockRight() {
sync.acquireShared(LockSide.RIGHT.getV());
}
public void releaseLeft() {
sync.releaseShared(LockSide.LEFT.getV());
}
public void releaseRight() {
sync.releaseShared(LockSide.RIGHT.getV());
}
public boolean tryLockLeft() {
return sync.tryAcquireShared(LockSide.LEFT) == ACQUISITION_SUCCEEDED;
}
public boolean tryLockRight() {
return sync.tryAcquireShared(LockSide.RIGHT) == ACQUISITION_SUCCEEDED;
}
private enum LockSide {
LEFT(-1), NONE(0), RIGHT(1);
private final int v;
LockSide(int v) {
this.v = v;
}
public int getV() {
return v;
}
}
/**
* <p>
* Keep count the count of threads holding either the LEFT or the RIGHT lock.
* </p>
*
* <li>A state ({@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#getState()}) greater than 0 means one or more threads are holding RIGHT lock. </li>
* <li>A state ({@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#getState()}) lower than 0 means one or more threads are holding LEFT lock.</li>
* <li>A state ({@link AbstractQueuedSynchronizer#getState()}) equal to zero means no thread is holding any lock.</li>
*/
private static final class LeftRightSync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
@Override
protected int tryAcquireShared(int requiredSide) {
return (tryChangeThreadCountHoldingCurrentLock(requiredSide, ChangeType.ADD) ? ACQUISITION_SUCCEEDED : ACQUISITION_FAILED);
}
@Override
protected boolean tryReleaseShared(int requiredSide) {
return tryChangeThreadCountHoldingCurrentLock(requiredSide, ChangeType.REMOVE);
}
public boolean tryChangeThreadCountHoldingCurrentLock(int requiredSide, ChangeType changeType) {
if (requiredSide != 1 && requiredSide != -1)
throw new AssertionError("You can either lock LEFT or RIGHT (-1 or +1)");
int curState;
int newState;
do {
curState = this.getState();
if (!sameSide(curState, requiredSide)) {
return false;
}
if (changeType == ChangeType.ADD) {
newState = curState + requiredSide;
} else {
newState = curState - requiredSide;
}
//TODO: protect against int overflow (hopefully you won't have so many threads)
} while (!this.compareAndSetState(curState, newState));
return true;
}
final int tryAcquireShared(LockSide lockSide) {
return this.tryAcquireShared(lockSide.getV());
}
final boolean tryReleaseShared(LockSide lockSide) {
return this.tryReleaseShared(lockSide.getV());
}
private boolean sameSide(int curState, int requiredSide) {
return curState == 0 || sameSign(curState, requiredSide);
}
private boolean sameSign(int a, int b) {
return (a >= 0) ^ (b < 0);
}
public enum ChangeType {
ADD, REMOVE
}
}
}
LeftRightLockTest.java
import org.junit.Test;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
public class LeftRightLockTest {
int logLineSequenceNumber = 0;
private LeftRightLock sut = new LeftRightLock();
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void acquiringLeftLockExcludeAcquiringRightLock() throws Exception {
sut.lockLeft();
Future<Boolean> task = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> sut.tryLockRight());
assertFalse("I shouldn't be able to acquire the RIGHT lock!", task.get());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void acquiringRightLockExcludeAcquiringLeftLock() throws Exception {
sut.lockRight();
Future<Boolean> task = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> sut.tryLockLeft());
assertFalse("I shouldn't be able to acquire the LEFT lock!", task.get());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void theLockShouldBeReentrant() throws Exception {
sut.lockLeft();
assertTrue(sut.tryLockLeft());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void multipleThreadShouldBeAbleToAcquireTheSameLock_Right() throws Exception {
sut.lockRight();
Future<Boolean> task = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> sut.tryLockRight());
assertTrue(task.get());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void multipleThreadShouldBeAbleToAcquireTheSameLock_left() throws Exception {
sut.lockLeft();
Future<Boolean> task = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> sut.tryLockLeft());
assertTrue(task.get());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void shouldKeepCountOfAllTheThreadsHoldingTheSide() throws Exception {
CountDownLatch latchA = new CountDownLatch(1);
CountDownLatch latchB = new CountDownLatch(1);
Thread threadA = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(latchA, sut);
Thread threadB = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(latchB, sut);
System.out.println("Both threads have acquired the left lock.");
try {
latchA.countDown();
threadA.join();
boolean acqStatus = sut.tryLockRight();
System.out.println("The right lock was " + (acqStatus ? "" : "not") + " acquired");
assertFalse("There is still a thread holding the left lock. This shouldn't succeed.", acqStatus);
} finally {
latchB.countDown();
threadB.join();
}
}
@Test(timeout = 5000)
public void shouldBlockThreadsTryingToAcquireLeftIfRightIsHeld() throws Exception {
sut.lockLeft();
CountDownLatch taskStartedLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
final Future<Boolean> task = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> {
taskStartedLatch.countDown();
sut.lockRight();
return false;
});
taskStartedLatch.await();
Thread.sleep(100);
assertFalse(task.isDone());
}
@Test
public void shouldBeFreeAfterRelease() throws Exception {
sut.lockLeft();
sut.releaseLeft();
assertTrue(sut.tryLockRight());
}
@Test
public void shouldBeFreeAfterMultipleThreadsReleaseIt() throws Exception {
CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
final Thread thread1 = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(latch, sut);
final Thread thread2 = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(latch, sut);
latch.countDown();
thread1.join();
thread2.join();
assertTrue(sut.tryLockRight());
}
@Test(timeout = 2000)
public void lockShouldBeReleasedIfNoThreadIsHoldingIt() throws Exception {
CountDownLatch releaseLeftLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
CountDownLatch rightLockTaskIsRunning = new CountDownLatch(1);
Thread leftLockThread1 = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(releaseLeftLatch, sut);
Thread leftLockThread2 = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(releaseLeftLatch, sut);
Future<Boolean> acquireRightLockTask = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> {
if (sut.tryLockRight())
throw new AssertionError("The left lock should be still held, I shouldn't be able to acquire right a this point.");
printSynchronously("Going to be blocked on right lock");
rightLockTaskIsRunning.countDown();
sut.lockRight();
printSynchronously("Lock acquired!");
return true;
});
rightLockTaskIsRunning.await();
releaseLeftLatch.countDown();
leftLockThread1.join();
leftLockThread2.join();
assertTrue(acquireRightLockTask.get());
}
private synchronized void printSynchronously(String str) {
System.out.println(logLineSequenceNumber++ + ")" + str);
System.out.flush();
}
private Thread spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(CountDownLatch releaseLockLatch, LeftRightLock lock) throws InterruptedException {
CountDownLatch lockAcquiredLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
final Thread thread = spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(releaseLockLatch, lockAcquiredLatch, lock);
lockAcquiredLatch.await();
return thread;
}
private Thread spawnThreadToAcquireLeftLock(CountDownLatch releaseLockLatch, CountDownLatch lockAcquiredLatch, LeftRightLock lock) {
final Thread thread = new Thread(() -> {
lock.lockLeft();
printSynchronously("Thread " + Thread.currentThread() + " Acquired left lock");
try {
lockAcquiredLatch.countDown();
releaseLockLatch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
} finally {
lock.releaseLeft();
}
printSynchronously("Thread " + Thread.currentThread() + " RELEASED left lock");
});
thread.start();
return thread;
}
}
关于Java 并发 : Paired locks with shared access,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41358436/
我正在编写一个具有以下签名的 Java 方法。 void Logger(Method method, Object[] args); 如果一个方法(例如 ABC() )调用此方法 Logger,它应该
我是 Java 新手。 我的问题是我的 Java 程序找不到我试图用作的图像文件一个 JButton。 (目前这段代码什么也没做,因为我只是得到了想要的外观第一的)。这是我的主课 代码: packag
好的,今天我在接受采访,我已经编写 Java 代码多年了。采访中说“Java 垃圾收集是一个棘手的问题,我有几个 friend 一直在努力弄清楚。你在这方面做得怎么样?”。她是想骗我吗?还是我的一生都
我的 friend 给了我一个谜语让我解开。它是这样的: There are 100 people. Each one of them, in his turn, does the following
如果我将使用 Java 5 代码的应用程序编译成字节码,生成的 .class 文件是否能够在 Java 1.4 下运行? 如果后者可以工作并且我正在尝试在我的 Java 1.4 应用程序中使用 Jav
有关于why Java doesn't support unsigned types的问题以及一些关于处理无符号类型的问题。我做了一些搜索,似乎 Scala 也不支持无符号数据类型。限制是Java和S
我只是想知道在一个 java 版本中生成的字节码是否可以在其他 java 版本上运行 最佳答案 通常,字节码无需修改即可在 较新 版本的 Java 上运行。它不会在旧版本上运行,除非您使用特殊参数 (
我有一个关于在命令提示符下执行 java 程序的基本问题。 在某些机器上我们需要指定 -cp 。 (类路径)同时执行java程序 (test为java文件名与.class文件存在于同一目录下) jav
我已经阅读 StackOverflow 有一段时间了,现在我才鼓起勇气提出问题。我今年 20 岁,目前在我的家乡(罗马尼亚克卢日-纳波卡)就读 IT 大学。足以介绍:D。 基本上,我有一家提供簿记应用
我有 public JSONObject parseXML(String xml) { JSONObject jsonObject = XML.toJSONObject(xml); r
我已经在 Java 中实现了带有动态类型的简单解释语言。不幸的是我遇到了以下问题。测试时如下代码: def main() { def ks = Map[[1, 2]].keySet()
一直提示输入 1 到 10 的数字 - 结果应将 st、rd、th 和 nd 添加到数字中。编写一个程序,提示用户输入 1 到 10 之间的任意整数,然后以序数形式显示该整数并附加后缀。 public
我有这个 DownloadFile.java 并按预期下载该文件: import java.io.*; import java.net.URL; public class DownloadFile {
我想在 GUI 上添加延迟。我放置了 2 个 for 循环,然后重新绘制了一个标签,但这 2 个 for 循环一个接一个地执行,并且标签被重新绘制到最后一个。 我能做什么? for(int i=0;
我正在对对象 Student 的列表项进行一些测试,但是我更喜欢在 java 类对象中创建硬编码列表,然后从那里提取数据,而不是连接到数据库并在结果集中选择记录。然而,自从我这样做以来已经很长时间了,
我知道对象创建分为三个部分: 声明 实例化 初始化 classA{} classB extends classA{} classA obj = new classB(1,1); 实例化 它必须使用
我有兴趣使用 GPRS 构建车辆跟踪系统。但是,我有一些问题要问以前做过此操作的人: GPRS 是最好的技术吗?人们意识到任何问题吗? 我计划使用 Java/Java EE - 有更好的技术吗? 如果
我可以通过递归方法反转数组,例如:数组={1,2,3,4,5} 数组结果={5,4,3,2,1}但我的结果是相同的数组,我不知道为什么,请帮助我。 public class Recursion { p
有这样的标准方式吗? 包括 Java源代码-测试代码- Ant 或 Maven联合单元持续集成(可能是巡航控制)ClearCase 版本控制工具部署到应用服务器 最后我希望有一个自动构建和集成环境。
我什至不知道这是否可能,我非常怀疑它是否可能,但如果可以,您能告诉我怎么做吗?我只是想知道如何从打印机打印一些文本。 有什么想法吗? 最佳答案 这里有更简单的事情。 import javax.swin
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!