windows - x86 LargeAddressAware 兼容性的单元测试

Question

对于 win32 可执行文件 (x86)，我们可以设置 LargeAddressAware 标志，以便它在 x64 Windows 上运行时可以访问 4 GB(而不是仅仅 2 GB)的虚拟地址空间。
这看起来很吸引人。但是，也存在风险。
例如，请参阅:Drawbacks of using /LARGEADDRESSAWARE for 32 bit Windows executables?

因此，让我们继续配置正在执行一些单元测试 的系统，并将系统范围的注册表开关AllocationPreference 设置为MEM_TOP_DOWN。
应该这样做，不是吗？

没有!
问题在于 Visual Studio 的 x86“测试运行器”(执行引擎)本身未启用 LAA。
这个父进程只会看到“较低的”2 GB 的 VAS，我们要测试的模块也是如此。

来自 VS2013.1 的例子

• mstest.exe 生成 QTAgent32.exe
• vstest.console.exe 生成 vstest.executionengine.x86.exe

所有这些都未启用 LAA!

那么使用启用了 LAA 的 x86 测试运行程序的推荐方法是什么？

---

这里有一小段代码(VS 单元测试，csharp)来检查 LAA 执行环境。
除非它成功，否则您的测试环境不适合让您的单元测试集(也)涵盖与 LAA 的兼容性:

using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;

namespace TestCheckEnv32LAA
{
    [TestClass]
    public class CheckEnv32LAA
    {
        #region [Native DLL import]

        [Flags()]
        public enum AllocationType : uint
        {
            COMMIT = 0x1000,
            RESERVE = 0x2000,
            RESET = 0x80000,
            LARGE_PAGES = 0x20000000,
            PHYSICAL = 0x400000,
            TOP_DOWN = 0x100000,
            WRITE_WATCH = 0x200000
        }

        [Flags()]
        public enum MemoryProtection : uint
        {
            EXECUTE = 0x10,
            EXECUTE_READ = 0x20,
            EXECUTE_READWRITE = 0x40,
            EXECUTE_WRITECOPY = 0x80,
            NOACCESS = 0x01,
            READONLY = 0x02,
            READWRITE = 0x04,
            WRITECOPY = 0x08,
            GUARD_Modifierflag = 0x100,
            NOCACHE_Modifierflag = 0x200,
            WRITECOMBINE_Modifierflag = 0x400
        }

        [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
        struct MEMORYSTATUSEX
        {
            public uint dwLength;
            public uint dwMemoryLoad;
            public ulong ullTotalPhys;
            public ulong ullAvailPhys;
            public ulong ullTotalPageFile;
            public ulong ullAvailPageFile;
            public ulong ullTotalVirtual;
            public ulong ullAvailVirtual;
            public ulong ullAvailExtendedVirtual;
        }

        [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
        extern static void GlobalMemoryStatusEx(ref MEMORYSTATUSEX status);

        [DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
        public static extern UIntPtr VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr lpAddress, UIntPtr dwSize,
        AllocationType flAllocationType, MemoryProtection flProtect);

        #endregion

        public CheckEnv32LAA()
        {
        }

        [TestMethod]
        public void CheckEnvironment32LAA()
        {
            // check for a suitable environment to test modules for compatibility with LargeAddressAware (LAA):
            // 1) OS must be x64
            // 2) test runner must be x86
            // 3) test runner must be LAA enabled itself
            // 4) memory allocation (with manual TopDown flag) must happen beyond the 2 GB boundary
            // 5) memory allocation (with default settings) must happen beyond the 2 GB boundary
            //
            // RE 3) this requirement is true for "regular" unit tests (to test DLL modules). it does not apply
            // for any tests spawning the application (EXE) to be tested as a separate process.
            // 
            // RE 5) a failure indicates the following registry switch has not been set:
            // [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management]
            // "AllocationPreference"=dword:00100000
            //
            // see:
            // https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2288728/

            String sParentProcName = Process.GetCurrentProcess().MainModule.FileName;

            //CHECK_1
            Assert.IsTrue(Environment.Is64BitOperatingSystem, "Test is not executing on x64 OS");

            //CHECK_2
            Assert.IsFalse(Environment.Is64BitProcess, "Test runner is not x86: " + sParentProcName);

            //CHECK_3
            MEMORYSTATUSEX tmpStatus = new MEMORYSTATUSEX();
            tmpStatus.dwLength = (uint)Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(MEMORYSTATUSEX));
            tmpStatus.ullTotalPhys = 0;
            GlobalMemoryStatusEx(ref tmpStatus);
            ulong uVM = tmpStatus.ullTotalVirtual;
            Assert.IsTrue(uVM > 0x80000000, "Test runner is not LAA enabled (max: " + uVM / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName);
            Assert.IsTrue(uVM <= 0x100000000, "Test runner is not x86 (max: " + uVM / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName);

            //CHECK_4
            UIntPtr pMem = UIntPtr.Zero;
            ulong uAddress = 0;
            pMem = VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr.Zero, (UIntPtr)1024, AllocationType.RESERVE | AllocationType.TOP_DOWN, MemoryProtection.READWRITE);
            uAddress = (ulong)pMem;
            Assert.IsTrue(uAddress > 0x80000000, "Test runner is not LAA enabled (highest: " + uAddress / (1024 * 1024) + "): " + sParentProcName);

            //CHECK_5
            pMem = VirtualAlloc(UIntPtr.Zero, (UIntPtr)1024, AllocationType.RESERVE, MemoryProtection.READWRITE);
            uAddress = (ulong)pMem;
            Assert.IsTrue(uAddress > 0x80000000, "System-wide MEM_TOP_DOWN is not set (allocated at: " + uAddress / (1024 * 1024) + ")");
        }
    }
}

Answer 1

到目前为止，我只遇到过建议将问题中列出的 Microsoft 二进制文件弄乱(即使用 editbin.exe 手动“修补”它们)。但这有以下缺点:

• 一旦为 Visual Studio 安装了任何 future 的服务包，我需要重复打补丁
• 我无法再并行测试:“常规”x86 和带有 LAA 的“扩展”x86

似乎微软必须实现一个适当的长期解决方案？:
http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/196039-microsoft-test-tools/suggestions/5781437