c# - 如何使 .NET COM 对象成为单元线程？

Question

.NET 对象默认是自由线程的。如果通过 COM 编码到另一个线程，它们总是被编码到自己，无论创建者线程是否为 STA，也无论它们的 ThreadingModel 注册表值如何。我怀疑，他们汇总了 Free Threaded Marshaler (有关 COM 线程的更多详细信息，请参见 here)。

我想让我的 .NET COM 对象在编码到另一个线程时使用标准的 COM 编码器代理。问题:

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Windows.Threading;

namespace ConsoleApplication
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            var apt1 = new WpfApartment();
            var apt2 = new WpfApartment();

            apt1.Invoke(() =>
            {
                var comObj = new ComObject();
                comObj.Test();

                IntPtr pStm;
                NativeMethods.CoMarshalInterThreadInterfaceInStream(NativeMethods.IID_IUnknown, comObj, out pStm);

                apt2.Invoke(() =>
                {
                    object unk;
                    NativeMethods.CoGetInterfaceAndReleaseStream(pStm, NativeMethods.IID_IUnknown, out unk);

                    Console.WriteLine(new { equal = Object.ReferenceEquals(comObj, unk) });

                    var marshaledComObj = (IComObject)unk;
                    marshaledComObj.Test();
                });
            });

            Console.ReadLine();
        }
    }

    // ComObject
    [ComVisible(true)]
    [Guid("00020400-0000-0000-C000-000000000046")] // IID_IDispatch
    [InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIDispatch)]
    public interface IComObject
    {
        void Test();
    }

    [ComVisible(true)]
    [ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
    [ComDefaultInterface(typeof(IComObject))]
    public class ComObject : IComObject
    {
        // IComObject methods
        public void Test()
        {
            Console.WriteLine(new { Environment.CurrentManagedThreadId });
        }
    }


    // WpfApartment - a WPF Dispatcher Thread 
    internal class WpfApartment : IDisposable
    {
        Thread _thread; // the STA thread
        public System.Threading.Tasks.TaskScheduler TaskScheduler { get; private set; }

        public WpfApartment()
        {
            var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<System.Threading.Tasks.TaskScheduler>();

            // start the STA thread with WPF Dispatcher
            _thread = new Thread(_ =>
            {
                NativeMethods.OleInitialize(IntPtr.Zero);
                try
                {
                    // post a callback to get the TaskScheduler
                    Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher.InvokeAsync(
                        () => tcs.SetResult(System.Threading.Tasks.TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext()),
                        DispatcherPriority.ApplicationIdle);

                    // run the WPF Dispatcher message loop
                    Dispatcher.Run();
                }
                finally
                {
                    NativeMethods.OleUninitialize();
                }
            });

            _thread.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA);
            _thread.IsBackground = true;
            _thread.Start();
            this.TaskScheduler = tcs.Task.Result;
        }

        // shutdown the STA thread
        public void Dispose()
        {
            if (_thread != null && _thread.IsAlive)
            {
                InvokeAsync(() => System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.ExitAllFrames());
                _thread.Join();
                _thread = null;
            }
        }

        // Task.Factory.StartNew wrappers
        public Task InvokeAsync(Action action)
        {
            return Task.Factory.StartNew(action,
                CancellationToken.None, TaskCreationOptions.None, this.TaskScheduler);
        }

        public void Invoke(Action action)
        {
            InvokeAsync(action).Wait();
        }
    }

    public static class NativeMethods
    {
        public static readonly Guid IID_IUnknown = new Guid("00000000-0000-0000-C000-000000000046");
        public static readonly Guid IID_IDispatch = new Guid("00020400-0000-0000-C000-000000000046");

        [DllImport("ole32.dll", PreserveSig = false)]
        public static extern void CoMarshalInterThreadInterfaceInStream(
            [In, MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPStruct)] Guid riid,
            [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.IUnknown)] object pUnk,
            out IntPtr ppStm);

        [DllImport("ole32.dll", PreserveSig = false)]
        public static extern void CoGetInterfaceAndReleaseStream(
            IntPtr pStm,
            [In, MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPStruct)] Guid riid,
            [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.IUnknown)] out object ppv);

        [DllImport("ole32.dll", PreserveSig = false)]
        public static extern void OleInitialize(IntPtr pvReserved);

        [DllImport("ole32.dll", PreserveSig = true)]
        public static extern void OleUninitialize();
    }
}

输出:

{ CurrentManagedThreadId = 11 }{ equal = True }{ CurrentManagedThreadId = 12 }

Note I use CoMarshalInterThreadInterfaceInStream/CoGetInterfaceAndReleaseStream to marshal ComObject from one STA thread to another. I want both Test() calls to be invoked on the same original thread, e.g. 11, as it would have been the case with a typical STA COM object implemented in C++.

One possible solution is to disable IMarshal interface on the .NET COM object:

[ComVisible(true)]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[ComDefaultInterface(typeof(IComObject))]
public class ComObject : IComObject, ICustomQueryInterface
{
    // IComObject methods
    public void Test()
    {
        Console.WriteLine(new { Environment.CurrentManagedThreadId });
    }

    public static readonly Guid IID_IMarshal = new Guid("00000003-0000-0000-C000-000000000046");

    public CustomQueryInterfaceResult GetInterface(ref Guid iid, out IntPtr ppv)
    {
        ppv = IntPtr.Zero;
        if (iid == IID_IMarshal)
        {
            return CustomQueryInterfaceResult.Failed;
        }
        return CustomQueryInterfaceResult.NotHandled;
    }
}

输出(根据需要):

{ CurrentManagedThreadId = 11 }{ equal = False }{ CurrentManagedThreadId = 11 }

这可行，但感觉像是特定于实现的 hack。有没有更体面的方法来完成这项工作，比如我可能忽略的一些特殊互操作属性？请注意，在现实生活中，ComObject 由遗留的非托管应用程序使用(并被编码(marshal))。

Answer 1

你可以继承自StandardOleMarshalObject or ServicedComponent为此效果:

Managed objects that are exposed to COM behave as if they had aggregated the free-threaded marshaler. In other words, they can be called from any COM apartment in a free-threaded manner. The only managed objects that do not exhibit this free-threaded behavior are those objects that derive from ServicedComponent or StandardOleMarshalObject.