作者热门文章
- android - RelativeLayout 背景可绘制重叠内容
- android - 如何链接 cpufeatures lib 以获取 native android 库?
- java - OnItemClickListener 不起作用,但 OnLongItemClickListener 在自定义 ListView 中起作用
- java - Android 文件转字符串
我一直在阅读其他帖子,但未能解决我的问题。
使用 DESC
命令查询速度慢了 x20 倍,我必须改进它。这是查询:
SELECT posts.post_id, posts.post_b_id, posts.post_title, posts.post_cont, posts.thumb, posts.post_user, boards.board_title_l, boards.board_title
FROM posts
INNER JOIN follow ON posts.post_b_id = follow.board_id
INNER JOIN boards ON posts.post_b_id = boards.board_id
WHERE follow.user_id =1
ORDER BY posts.post_id DESC
LIMIT 10
这些是表格(已更新):
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `posts` (
`post_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`post_b_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`post_title` varchar(50) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_cont` text COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_mintxt` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_type` char(3) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`thumb` varchar(200) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_user` varchar(16) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`published` enum('0','1') COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_ip` varchar(94) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`post_ip_dat` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`post_up` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`post_down` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY (`post_id`),
KEY `post_b_id` (`post_b_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin AUTO_INCREMENT=405 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `boards` (
`board_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`board_title_l` varchar(19) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`board_user_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`board_title` varchar(19) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`board_user` varchar(16) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`board_txt` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL,
`board_img` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL,
`board_vid` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL,
`board_desc` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`board_mod_p` tinyint(3) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`board_ip` varchar(94) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`board_dat_ip` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`board_id`),
UNIQUE KEY `board_title_l` (`board_title_l`),
KEY `board_user_id` (`board_user_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin AUTO_INCREMENT=89 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `follow` (
`user_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`board_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`user_id`,`board_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin;
使用默认的 ASC
顺序,它只使用 index 和 where,DESC
使用 index、where、temporary 和 filesort。
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows filtered Extra
1 SIMPLE follow ref user_id user_id 4 const 2 100.00 Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort
1 SIMPLE boards eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 xxxx.follow.board_id 1 100.00
1 SIMPLE posts ref post_b_id post_b_id 4 xxxx.boards.board_id 3 100.00 Using where
如何使查询在没有文件排序和临时的情况下按 DESC
顺序接收结果。
更新:我做了一个新查询,没有临时或文件排序,但类型:索引,过滤:7340.00。如果帖子位于表的末尾,则几乎与 ASC
命令一样快,但如果正在搜索的帖子位于表的开头,则速度较慢。所以看起来更好,但这还不够。
SELECT posts.post_id, posts.post_b_id, posts.post_title, posts.post_cont, posts.thumb, posts.post_user, boards.board_title_l, boards.board_title
FROM posts INNER JOIN boards ON posts.post_b_id = boards.board_id
WHERE posts.post_b_id
IN (
SELECT follow.board_id
FROM follow
WHERE follow.user_id = 1
)
ORDER BY posts.post_id DESC
LIMIT 10
解释:
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows filtered Extra
1 PRIMARY posts index post_b_id PRIMARY 8 NULL 10 7340.00 Using where
1 PRIMARY boards eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 xxxx.posts.post_b_id 1 100.00
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY follow eq_ref user_id user_id 8 const,func 1 100.00 Using index
更新:解释来自 dened's answer 的查询:
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows filtered Extra
1 PRIMARY <derived2>ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 10 100.00
1 PRIMARY posts eq_ref PRIMARY,post_b_id PRIMARY 4 sq.post_id 1 100.00
1 PRIMARY boards eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 xxxx.posts.post_b_id 1 100.00
2 DERIVED follow ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 1 100.00 Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort
2 DERIVED posts ref post_b_id post_b_id 4 xxxx.follow.board_id 6 100.00 Using index
时间:
Original query no order (ASC): 0.187500 seconds
Original query DESC: 2.812500 seconds
Second query posts at the end (DESC): 0.218750 seconds
Second query posts at the beginning (DESC): 3.293750 seconds
dened's query DESC: 0.421875 seconds
dened's query no order (ASC): 0.323750 seconds
有趣的是,如果我添加 ORDER BY ASC
和 DESC
一样慢。
改变表格顺序将是一个很好的方式,但正如我在评论中所说,我无法做到这一点。
最佳答案
您可以通过将所有过滤工作转移到仅访问索引的子查询(操作索引通常比操作其他数据快得多)并在最外层查询中获取其余数据来帮助 MySQL 优化器:
SELECT posts.post_id,
posts.post_b_id,
posts.post_title,
posts.post_cont,
posts.thumb,
posts.post_user,
boards.board_title_l,
boards.board_title
FROM (SELECT post_id
FROM posts
JOIN follow
ON posts.post_b_id = follow.board_id
WHERE follow.user_id = 1
ORDER BY post_id DESC
LIMIT 10) sq
JOIN posts
ON posts.post_id = sq.post_id
JOIN boards
ON boards.board_id = posts.post_b_id
请注意,我从外部查询中省略了 ORDER BY posts.post_id DESC
,因为在代码中对最终结果进行排序通常比使用 MySQL 查询排序更快(MySQL 通常使用 < em>文件排序)。
附言您可以用主键替换 follow
表中的唯一键。
关于mysql - 避免使用 INNER JOIN + ORDER BY 进行文件排序,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30414641/
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!