gpt4 book ai didi

MySql 对连接查询的计数非常慢

转载 作者:可可西里 更新时间:2023-11-01 06:51:33 25 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我有一个 mysql View :

CREATE VIEW
loggingquarantine_quarantine ( id, mail_id, partition_tag, content, rs, subject, sender, TIME,
spam_level, size, sid, email ) AS
SELECT
concat(CAST(`mr`.`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) charset utf8),CAST(`mr`.`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255)
charset utf8)) AS `id`,
`mr`.`mail_id` AS `mail_id`,
`mr`.`partition_tag` AS `partition_tag`,
`mr`.`content` AS `content`,
`mr`.`rs` AS `rs`,
`m`.`subject` AS `subject`,
`m`.`from_addr` AS `sender`,
`m`.`time_num` AS `TIME`,
`m`.`spam_level` AS `spam_level`,
`m`.`size` AS `size`,
`m`.`sid` AS `sid`,
`maddr`.`email` AS `email`
FROM
(((`msgrcpt` `mr` JOIN `msgs` `m`
ON
(
`m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag`
AND
`m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`
)
)
JOIN `maddr` maddr
ON
(
`mr`.`rid` = `maddr`.`id`
)
))

当我尝试对这个 View 进行计数时,250 万条记录大约需要 13 分钟。那太慢了。所有字段都有索引。如果我确实指望每张 table ,则不会超过 20 秒。这是 mysql explain 显示的内容:

mysql> explain SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `loggingquarantine_quarantine`;
+----+-------------+-------+--------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | maddr | index | PRIMARY | maddr_partition_tag_idx | 5 | NULL | 1016497 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | mr | ref | PRIMARY,msgrcpt_idx_rid,msgrcpt_mail_id_idx,msgrcpt_partition_tag_idx | msgrcpt_idx_rid | 8 | mroute_logquar.maddr.id | 2 | Using index |
| 1 | SIMPLE | m | eq_ref | PRIMARY,msgs_mail_id_idx,msgs_partition_tag_idx | PRIMARY | 22 | mroute_logquar.mr.partition_tag,mroute_logquar.mr.mail_id | 1 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------------+

我怎样才能优化查询/ View ,使计算不会花费 13 分钟。当前查询有什么问题?

更新。如果我在不查看的情况下直接对选择进行选择计数,它仍然会得到相同的 14 分钟查询。

mysql> select count(1) FROM     (((`msgrcpt` `mr` JOIN `msgs` `m` ON     (                  `m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag`         AND                 `m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`      ) ) JOIN `maddr` maddr ON     (         `mr`.`rid` = `maddr`.`id`     ) ));

+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
| 2582227 |
+----------+
1 row in set (14 min 28.96 sec)

这是我在三个单独的查询中执行计数时的结果:

mysql> select count(1) from msgrcpt;
+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
| 2587307 |
+----------+
1 row in set (46.02 sec)

mysql> select count(1) from msgs;
+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
| 2421710 |
+----------+
1 row in set (7.77 sec)

mysql> select count(1) from maddr;
+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
| 994880 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.23 sec)

更新 2.

所有表都是 InnoDB。

mysql> SHOW status like 'key_%';                                                                                                                                                                               +------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+------------------------+-------+
| Key_blocks_not_flushed | 0 |
| Key_blocks_unused | 26792 |
| Key_blocks_used | 0 |
| Key_read_requests | 0 |
| Key_reads | 0 |
| Key_write_requests | 0 |
| Key_writes | 0 |
+------------------------+-------+

msgs 和 msgrcpt 表有一个复合主键(msgs 的 mail_id, partation_tag 和 msgrpt 的 (partition_tag,mail_id,rseqnum) ).更新单表解释:

mysql> explain select count(1) from msgs;
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | msgs | index | NULL | msgs_idx_time_num | 4 | NULL | 2357360 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> explain select count(1) from msgrcpt;
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | msgrcpt | index | NULL | msgrcpt_rs_idx | 3 | NULL | 2620758 | Using index |
+----+-------------+---------+-------+---------------+----------------+---------+------+---------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> explain select count(1) from maddr;
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------------+---------+------+--------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------------+---------+------+--------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | maddr | index | NULL | maddr_partition_tag_idx | 5 | NULL | 967058 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+-------+---------------+-------------------------+---------+------+--------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

更新。为所有表创建表:

mysql> show create table msgrcpt;
| Table | Create Table
| msgrcpt | CREATE TABLE `msgrcpt` (
`partition_tag` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`mail_id` varbinary(16) NOT NULL,
`rseqnum` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`rid` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL,
`is_local` char(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`content` char(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`ds` char(1) NOT NULL,
`rs` char(1) NOT NULL,
`bl` char(1) DEFAULT '',
`wl` char(1) DEFAULT '',
`bspam_level` float DEFAULT NULL,
`smtp_resp` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
PRIMARY KEY (`partition_tag`,`mail_id`,`rseqnum`),
KEY `msgrcpt_idx_rid` (`rid`),
KEY `msgrcpt_mail_id_idx` (`mail_id`),
KEY `msgrcpt_rs_idx` (`rs`),
KEY `msgrcpt_ds_idx` (`ds`),
KEY `msgrcpt_partition_tag_idx` (`partition_tag`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 |

| msgs | CREATE TABLE `msgs` (
`partition_tag` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`mail_id` varbinary(16) NOT NULL,
`secret_id` varbinary(16) DEFAULT '',
`am_id` varchar(20) NOT NULL,
`time_num` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`time_iso` char(16) NOT NULL,
`sid` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL,
`policy` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
`client_addr` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
`size` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`originating` char(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`content` char(1) DEFAULT NULL,
`quar_type` char(1) DEFAULT NULL,
`quar_loc` varbinary(255) DEFAULT '',
`dsn_sent` char(1) DEFAULT NULL,
`spam_level` float DEFAULT NULL,
`message_id` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
`from_addr` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
`subject` varchar(255) DEFAULT '',
`host` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`partition_tag`,`mail_id`),
KEY `msgs_idx_sid` (`sid`),
KEY `msgs_idx_mess_id` (`message_id`),
KEY `msgs_idx_time_num` (`time_num`),
KEY `msgs_mail_id_idx` (`mail_id`),
KEY `msgs_partition_tag_idx` (`partition_tag`),
KEY `msgs_content_idx` (`content`),
FULLTEXT KEY `ft_from_addr` (`from_addr`),
FULLTEXT KEY `ft_subject` (`subject`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 |

| maddr | CREATE TABLE `maddr` (
`partition_tag` int(11) DEFAULT '0',
`id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`email` varbinary(255) NOT NULL,
`domain` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `part_email` (`partition_tag`,`email`),
KEY `maddr_email_idx` (`email`),
KEY `maddr_partition_tag_idx` (`partition_tag`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=3373444 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 |

带有配置文件的查询:

mysql> SET PROFILING=1; SELECT
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

-> count(1)
-> FROM
-> (((`msgrcpt` `mr` JOIN `msgs` `m`
-> ON
-> (
-> `m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag`
-> AND
-> `m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`
-> )
-> )
-> JOIN `maddr` maddr
-> ON
-> (
-> `mr`.`rid` = `maddr`.`id`
-> )
-> )); SHOW PROFILE ALL;

+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
| 4279394 |
+----------+
1 row in set (23 min 56.61 sec)

+----------------------+------------+-----------+------------+-------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+---------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+-----------------------+------------------+-------------+
| Status | Duration | CPU_user | CPU_system | Context_voluntary | Context_involuntary | Block_ops_in | Block_ops_out | Messages_sent | Messages_received | Page_faults_major | Page_faults_minor | Swaps | Source_function | Source_file | Source_line |
+----------------------+------------+-----------+------------+-------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+---------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+-----------------------+------------------+-------------+
| starting | 0.000161 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NULL | NULL | NULL |
| checking permissions | 0.000030 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | check_access | sql_parse.cc | 5043 |
| checking permissions | 0.000019 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | check_access | sql_parse.cc | 5043 |
| checking permissions | 0.000020 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | check_access | sql_parse.cc | 5043 |
| Opening tables | 0.000039 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | open_tables | sql_base.cc | 5014 |
| System lock | 0.000026 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_lock_tables | lock.cc | 304 |
| init | 0.000040 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_select | sql_select.cc | 1041 |
| optimizing | 0.000030 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | optimize | sql_optimizer.cc | 138 |
| statistics | 0.000063 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | optimize | sql_optimizer.cc | 358 |
| preparing | 0.000032 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | optimize | sql_optimizer.cc | 470 |
| executing | 0.000021 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | exec | sql_executor.cc | 137 |
| Sending data | 999.999999 | 97.014251 | 10.376423 | 681167 | 25822 | 5157072 | 1951032 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 277 | 0 | execute | sql_executor.cc | 758 |
| end | 0.000106 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_select | sql_select.cc | 1071 |
| query end | 0.000017 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_execute_command | sql_parse.cc | 4761 |
| closing tables | 0.000021 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_execute_command | sql_parse.cc | 4809 |
| freeing items | 0.000030 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | mysql_parse | sql_parse.cc | 5997 |
| logging slow query | 0.000059 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | log_slow_statement | sql_parse.cc | 1720 |
| cleaning up | 0.000019 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | dispatch_command | sql_parse.cc | 1654 |
+----------------------+------------+-----------+------------+-------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+---------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+-------+-----------------------+------------------+-------------+
18 rows in set (0.02 sec)

表上的索引:

mysql> show index from msgs;
+-------+------------+------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | Index_comment |
+-------+------------+------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| msgs | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | partition_tag | A | 16 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 0 | PRIMARY | 2 | mail_id | A | 4174440 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_idx_sid | 1 | sid | A | 2087220 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_idx_mess_id | 1 | message_id | A | 4174440 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_idx_time_num | 1 | time_num | A | 1391480 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_mail_id_idx | 1 | mail_id | A | 4174440 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_partition_tag_idx | 1 | partition_tag | A | 16 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | msgs_content_idx | 1 | content | A | 16 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| msgs | 1 | ft_from_addr | 1 | from_addr | NULL | 4174440 | NULL | NULL | YES | FULLTEXT | | |
| msgs | 1 | ft_subject | 1 | subject | NULL | 4174440 | NULL | NULL | YES | FULLTEXT | | |
+-------+------------+------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.97 sec)

MSGRCPT

mysql> show index from msgrcpt;
+---------+------------+---------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | Index_comment |
+---------+------------+---------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| msgrcpt | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | partition_tag | A | 29 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 0 | PRIMARY | 2 | mail_id | A | 5218535 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 0 | PRIMARY | 3 | rseqnum | A | 5218535 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 1 | msgrcpt_idx_rid | 1 | rid | A | 347902 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 1 | msgrcpt_mail_id_idx | 1 | mail_id | A | 5218535 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 1 | msgrcpt_rs_idx | 1 | rs | A | 29 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 1 | msgrcpt_ds_idx | 1 | ds | A | 29 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| msgrcpt | 1 | msgrcpt_partition_tag_idx | 1 | partition_tag | A | 29 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
+---------+------------+---------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
8 rows in set (0.70 sec)

地址:

mysql> show index from maddr;
+-------+------------+-------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | Index_comment |
+-------+------------+-------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| maddr | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | id | A | 1653970 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| maddr | 0 | part_email | 1 | partition_tag | A | 19 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| maddr | 0 | part_email | 2 | email | A | 1653970 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| maddr | 1 | maddr_email_idx | 1 | email | A | 1653970 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| maddr | 1 | maddr_partition_tag_idx | 1 | partition_tag | A | 19 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
+-------+------------+-------------------------+--------------+---------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
5 rows in set (0.41 sec)

Inno 数据库缓冲区大小

mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'innodb_buffer_pool_size';
+-------------------------+------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-------------------------+------------+
| innodb_buffer_pool_size | 2147483648 |
+-------------------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.02 sec)

最佳答案

您是否尝试过使用一些 STRAIGHT_JOIN 而不是简单的 JOIN 来改变 JOIN 中使用的表的顺序?有时查询优化器不会为特定查询选择理想的顺序。换句话说,您认为它的性能如何?

SELECT
concat(CAST(`mr`.`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) charset utf8),CAST(`mr`.`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255) charset utf8)) AS `id`,
`mr`.`mail_id` AS `mail_id`,
`mr`.`partition_tag` AS `partition_tag`,
`mr`.`content` AS `content`,
`mr`.`rs` AS `rs`,
`m`.`subject` AS `subject`,
`m`.`from_addr` AS `sender`,
`m`.`time_num` AS `TIME`,
`m`.`spam_level` AS `spam_level`,
`m`.`size` AS `size`,
`m`.`sid` AS `sid`,
`maddr`.`email` AS `email`
FROM
`msgrcpt` `mr`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `msgs` `m`
ON
`m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag` AND
`m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `maddr` maddr
ON
`mr`.`rid` = `maddr`.`id`

或者由于您在 msgrcpt 表上使用了一些繁重的转换和强制转换,如果您像这样强制它在查询的最后加入,会发生什么情况?

SELECT
concat(CAST(`mr`.`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) charset utf8),CAST(`mr`.`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255) charset utf8)) AS `id`,
`mr`.`mail_id` AS `mail_id`,
`mr`.`partition_tag` AS `partition_tag`,
`mr`.`content` AS `content`,
`mr`.`rs` AS `rs`,
`m`.`subject` AS `subject`,
`m`.`from_addr` AS `sender`,
`m`.`time_num` AS `TIME`,
`m`.`spam_level` AS `spam_level`,
`m`.`size` AS `size`,
`m`.`sid` AS `sid`,
`maddr`.`email` AS `email`
FROM
`maddr` `maddr`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `msgrcpt` `mr`
ON
`maddr`.`id` = `mr.`rid`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `msgs` `m`
ON
`m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag` AND
`m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`

如果需要,您可以尝试更多订单,可能有一个“神奇订单”导致您的查询压缩。例如,另一种变体可能是:

FROM
`msgs` `m`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `msgrcpt` `mr`
ON
`m`.`partition_tag` = `mr`.`partition_tag` AND
`m`.`mail_id` = `mr`.`mail_id`
STRAIGHT_JOIN `maddr`
ON
`maddr`.`id` = `mr`.`rid`

...等等。

此外,在您的 SELECT 列中,所有这些强制转换都会稍微降低您的性能,因为无论您选择多少行,它都必须这样做,这可能很多。您是否考虑过只向已计算的 msgrcpt 表添加一列,这样它就不必在查询中执行此操作?如果您不想在代码中考虑额外的列,则可以向数据库添加触发器以使用计算值高效自动地更新它。通常,使用这种优化有点矫枉过正,但在对数百万行执行 SELECT 查询时,它可能就可以解决问题。

编辑:这是我建议的更改 msgrcpt 表的方法。由于它正在运行一个触发器来计算新的列值,因此它会使插入行的速度变慢非常小,但我认为它会在加快您尝试运行的查询速度方面得到返回。标准免责声明适用——如果没有先在测试副本上进行彻底测试,请勿在您的生产数据库上运行它!

-- The UPDATE command will probably take some time to run since it's updating
-- millions of rows. Be patient!
ALTER TABLE `msgrcpt` ADD COLUMN `friendly_id` TEXT NULL AFTER `rs`;
UPDATE `msgrcpt` SET
`friendly_id` = CONCAT(CAST(`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8),
CAST(`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8));
DELIMITER $$
CREATE TRIGGER `trig_calc_id` BEFORE INSERT ON `msgrcpt`
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
SET NEW.`friendly_id` =
CONCAT(CAST(NEW.`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8),
CAST(NEW.`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8));
END $$
CREATE TRIGGER `trig_update_id` BEFORE UPDATE ON `msgrcpt`
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
SET NEW.`friendly_id` =
CONCAT(CAST(NEW.`mail_id` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8),
CAST(NEW.`partition_tag` AS CHAR(255) CHARSET utf8));
END $$
DELIMITER ;

现在不要选择那些乱七八糟的 CONCATed CASTed 东西,只需选择 mr.friendly_id(或您选择命名该列的任何内容)。你的表现应该会好很多。

希望这对您有所帮助,让我知道进展如何!

关于MySql 对连接查询的计数非常慢,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11253996/

25 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com