gpt4 book ai didi

mysql - 如何通过 mysql 中的连接提高性能排序

转载 作者:可可西里 更新时间:2023-11-01 06:45:31 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我正在开发社交网络跟踪应用程序。即使加入适当的索引也能正常工作。但是当我添加 order by 子句时,总查询需要 100 倍的时间来执行。以下查询我用来获取 twitter_users 而没有 order by 子句。

SELECT DISTINCT  `tracked_twitter`.id
FROM tracked_twitter
INNER JOIN `twitter_content` ON `tracked_twitter`.`id` = `twitter_content`.`tracked_twitter_id`
INNER JOIN `tracker_twitter_content` ON `twitter_content`.`id` = `tracker_twitter_content`.`twitter_content_id`
AND `tracker_twitter_content`.`tracker_id` = '88'
LIMIT 20

显示第 0 - 19 行(总共 20 行,查询耗时 0.0714 秒)

但是当我添加 order by 子句时(在索引列上)

SELECT DISTINCT  `tracked_twitter`.id
FROM tracked_twitter
INNER JOIN `twitter_content` ON `tracked_twitter`.`id` = `twitter_content`.`tracked_twitter_id`
INNER JOIN `tracker_twitter_content` ON `twitter_content`.`id` = `tracker_twitter_content`.`twitter_content_id`
AND `tracker_twitter_content`.`tracker_id` = '88'
ORDER BY tracked_twitter.followers_count DESC
LIMIT 20

显示第 0 - 19 行(总共 20 行,查询耗时 13.4636 秒)

解释 enter image description here

当我单独在其表中实现 order by 子句时,它不会花费太多时间

SELECT * FROM `tracked_twitter` WHERE 1 order by `followers_count` desc limit 20

显示第 0 - 19 行(总共 20 行,查询耗时 0.0711 秒)[followers_count: 68236387 - 10525612]

建表查询如下

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tracked_twitter` (
`id` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`handle` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`name` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`location` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci DEFAULT NULL,
`description` text COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci,
`profile_image` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`followers_count` int(11) NOT NULL,
`is_influencer` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`created_at` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`updated_at` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`gender` enum('Male','Female','Other') COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci
DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `followers_count` (`followers_count`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci;

所以当我在它的表上执行它时,join 运行良好,并没有减慢查询和顺序。那么我该如何提高性能呢?

更新 1

@GordonLinoff 方法解决了我是否只需要来自父表的结果集。我想知道每个人的推文数量(与 tracked_twitter 表匹配的 twitter_content 的数量)。我该如何修改它?如果我想在推文内容上使用数学函数,我该怎么做??

SELECT  `tracked_twitter` . * , COUNT( * ) AS twitterContentCount, retweet_count + favourite_count + reply_count AS engagement
FROM `tracked_twitter`
INNER JOIN `twitter_content` ON `tracked_twitter`.`id` = `twitter_content`.`tracked_twitter_id`
INNER JOIN `tracker_twitter_content` ON `twitter_content`.`id` = `tracker_twitter_content`.`twitter_content_id`
WHERE `is_influencer` != '1'
AND `tracker_twitter_content`.`tracker_id` = '88'
AND `tracked_twitter_id` != '0'
GROUP BY `tracked_twitter`.`id`
ORDER BY twitterContentCount DESC
LIMIT 20
OFFSET 0

最佳答案

尝试去掉 distinct。那是一个性能 killer 。我不确定为什么您的第一个查询运行得很快;也许 MySQL 足够聪明,可以优化它。

我会尝试:

SELECT tt.id
FROM tracked_twitter tt
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM twitter_content tc INNER JOIN
tracker_twitter_content ttc
ON tc.id = ttc.twitter_content_id
WHERE ttc.tracker_id = 88 AND
tt.id = tc.tracked_twitter_id
)
ORDER BY tt.followers_count DESC ;

对于此版本,您需要索引:tracked_twitter(followers_count, id)twitter_content(tracked_twitter_id, id),以及tracker_twitter_content(twitter_content_id, tracker_id)

关于mysql - 如何通过 mysql 中的连接提高性能排序,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46053284/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com