iphone - run loop/drawRect 中神秘的 "progressive slowing"问题-6ren

iphone - run loop/drawRect 中神秘的 "progressive slowing"问题

转载作者：可可西里更新时间：2023-11-01 03:28:16

这是一个真正的谜。

假设您正在执行在屏幕外绘制复杂图像 (CGLayer) 的传统过程，并且在绘制时间歇性地将图像更新到屏幕上。

如您所知，执行此操作的方法是:在后台运行大型绘图过程，并根据需要调用前台的 setNeedsDisplays，从而更新图像。这很简单，只需两行代码即可实现。

但是，当您这样做时，会出现一个神秘的问题:每次绘制周期所花费的时间，每次都在增加，变得无法使用。此外，时间可能会不规律地变化。

这是一个已知的 iOS 错误，还是？有人以前见过这个吗？

这是一个非常简单、非常容易理解的应用程序，它演示了这个问题:

http://www.fileswap.com/dl/p8lU3gAi/stepwiseDrawingV2.zip.html

输出示例如下。

有人知道为什么会这样吗？这是操作系统的非常奇怪的行为。

稍后 ... FELZ 想出了一个惊人的解决方法。 Felz 每轮复制 CGLayer 一次。这完全阻止了奇怪的行为。

然而，对于到底发生了什么，仍然没有真正清楚的理解:因此，从字面上看，当这个奇怪的问题出现时，时间用在了哪里？

这是一个很长的输出示例......

请注意，您有时会得到如下所示的“双重怪异”结果:它表现出“正常”的怪异行为:每转一圈时间都会增加。然而，偶尔时间会下降到“非常快”几轮，然后返回。很奇怪吧？此外，如果您在模拟器上运行，请快速前后点击 Mac 上不相关的应用程序以获得“更奇怪”的结果。

虽然 Felz 给出了完美的工作答案，但实际机制仍然是个谜。

:26:56.697 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     0
:26:56.707 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    10
:26:56.717 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    10
:26:56.744 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    27
:26:56.771 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    27
:26:56.807 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    37
:26:56.829 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    22
:26:56.864 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    35
:26:56.891 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    28
:26:56.936 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    45
:26:56.949 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    12
:26:56.981 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    32
:26:57.008 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    27
:26:57.041 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    33
:26:57.074 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    34
:26:57.109 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    34
:26:57.143 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    35
:26:57.179 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    36
:26:57.220 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    42
:26:57.271 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    51
:26:57.312 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    40
:26:57.356 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    45
:26:57.400 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    44
:26:57.447 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    46
:26:57.493 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    46
:26:57.542 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    49
:26:57.593 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    50
:26:57.707 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   114
:26:57.766 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    58
:26:57.801 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    36
:26:57.856 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    55
:26:57.918 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    62
:26:57.976 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    58
:26:58.039 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    62
:26:58.101 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    63
:26:58.165 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    63
:26:58.229 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    64
:26:58.294 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    66
:26:58.365 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    70
:26:58.436 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    72
:26:58.507 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    70
:26:58.572 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    65
:26:58.652 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    81
:26:58.726 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    74
:26:58.809 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    82
:26:58.879 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    70
:26:58.965 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    87
:26:59.043 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    77
:26:59.126 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    83
:26:59.210 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    84
:26:59.215 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     6
:26:59.310 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    95
:26:59.397 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    87
:26:59.486 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    89
:26:59.577 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    91
:26:59.668 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    91
:26:59.768 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   100
:26:59.856 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    88
:26:59.857 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     1
:26:59.965 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   108
:27:00.064 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   100
:27:00.165 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   101
:27:00.268 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   103
:27:00.371 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   103
:27:00.377 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     7
:27:00.493 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   115
:27:00.601 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   108
:27:00.710 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   109
:27:00.820 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   111
:27:00.939 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   119
:27:01.053 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   114
:27:01.162 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   108
:27:01.278 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   116
:27:01.396 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   118
:27:01.515 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   119
:27:01.637 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   122
:27:01.648 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was    11
:27:01.769 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   121
:27:01.775 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     6
:27:01.910 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   135
:27:01.911 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     1
:27:02.045 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   134
:27:02.175 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   131
:27:02.314 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   139
:27:02.441 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   127
:27:02.586 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   145
:27:02.715 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   129
:27:02.853 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   138
:27:03.000 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   146
:27:03.133 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   134
:27:03.276 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   142
:27:03.419 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   143
:27:03.564 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   145
:27:03.717 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   153
:27:03.858 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   141
:27:04.008 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   149
:27:04.159 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   151
:27:04.318 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   159
:27:04.471 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   153
:27:04.620 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   149
:27:04.778 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   158
:27:04.939 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   161
:27:05.098 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   160
:27:05.269 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   171
:27:05.433 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   164
:27:05.600 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   166
:27:05.765 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   165
:27:05.932 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   167
:27:06.107 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   175
:27:06.269 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   163
:27:06.441 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   171
:27:06.617 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   176
:27:06.798 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   181
:27:06.971 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   173
:27:07.154 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   183
:27:07.326 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   172
:27:07.513 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   187
:27:07.689 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   176
:27:07.875 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   185
:27:08.059 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   184
:27:08.251 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   192
:27:08.432 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   181
:27:08.620 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   188
:27:08.811 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   190
:27:09.004 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   193
:27:09.195 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   191
:27:09.393 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   198
:27:09.590 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   197
:27:09.795 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   205
:27:09.989 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   193
:27:10.189 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   200
:27:10.392 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   203
:27:10.600 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   208
:27:10.801 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   202
:27:11.006 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   205
:27:11.220 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   213
:27:11.430 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   210
:27:11.633 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   203
:27:11.843 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   210
:27:12.055 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   213
:27:12.276 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   220
:27:12.484 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   208
:27:12.700 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   216
:27:12.919 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   219
:27:13.145 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   226
:27:13.360 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   215
:27:13.584 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   224
:27:13.813 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   229
:27:14.049 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   236
:27:14.269 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   220
:27:14.496 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   228
:27:14.725 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   229
:27:14.963 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   238
:27:15.196 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   232
:27:15.423 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   227
:27:15.657 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   235
:27:15.901 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   243
:27:16.133 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   232
:27:16.372 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   240
:27:16.613 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   241
:27:16.863 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   250
:27:17.101 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   238
:27:17.346 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   245
:27:17.593 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   247
:27:17.849 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   256
:27:18.093 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   244
:27:18.344 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   251
:27:18.603 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   260
:27:18.854 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   251
:27:19.114 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   259
:27:19.376 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   263
:27:19.646 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   270
:27:19.927 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   281
:27:20.202 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   274
:27:20.460 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   259
:27:20.743 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   283
:27:21.011 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   268
:27:21.281 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   270
:27:21.563 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   282
:27:21.848 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   284
:27:22.126 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   278
:27:22.398 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   272
:27:22.677 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   279
:27:22.970 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   293
:27:23.258 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   288
:27:23.545 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   287
:27:23.834 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   289
:27:24.122 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   288
:27:24.413 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   292
:27:24.708 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   295
:27:25.002 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   294
:27:25.303 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   301
:27:25.585 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   282
:27:25.880 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   294
:27:26.174 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   294
:27:26.470 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   296
:27:26.475 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was     5
:27:26.777 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   302
:27:27.077 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   299
:27:27.373 stepwiseDrawing[5334:1a03] time difference was   297

最佳答案

首先让我说这是一个有趣的谜题。我在这方面工作很开心。很好的问题和很好的示例代码。

这是我对可能的答案的看法:

我看到的问题如下。 CGLayer 非常适合重复绘制，因为它们将渲染缓存到平面图像中。当附加操作附加到上下文时，缓存将失效。发生这种情况时，CGLayer 会再次渲染。速度变慢的原因是代码维护了一个 CGLayer (offscreenPrefabCGL)，它在 paintActualGutsOfHugeImage 循环的每次迭代中都修改了上下文。由于 offscreenPrefabCGL 的 上下文中的操作序列随着每朵花的增长而增长，因此每次渲染都需要更多时间。这解释了每次显示的时间增加。

我看到两个解决方案:

将新渲染剪辑到 PaintView 中的特定位置。不是使整个 View 失效，而是仅使真正需要重新绘制的 CGRect 失效。据我了解，这是@v01d 提出的解决方案。
展平图层。不是持有单个 CGLayer，而是在每次迭代时复制 CGLayer。这会在层中保持平面图像，渲染速度非常快。

我实现了 (2) 并取得了良好的效果。前 100 朵花更快，然后它会在 120 毫秒内稳定下来(在设备中)。我用多达 2000 朵花测试了我的修改版本。

我的修改版本在:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9866261/felz_mod_stepwiseDrawingV2.zip

关于iphone - run loop/drawRect 中神秘的 "progressive slowing"问题，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4786754/

文章推荐： java - 缩小边距 - Java 打印

文章推荐： java - java applet 的打印机输出不再是 vector 格式？

文章推荐： objective-c - 使用按钮更改 UIImage View 的图像

文章推荐： android - 将 iOS 应用程序移植到 Android

loops - 好奇 Haskell 中如何评估 "loop = loop"
我认为这样的表达式会导致 Haskell 永远评估。但是 GHCi 和编译程序中的行为让我感到惊讶。例如，在 GHCi 中，这些表达式一直阻塞到 I Control+C ，但不消耗 CPU。看起来像
for-loop - 尽管我们已经有了 "for loop"或反之亦然，为什么还要创建 "while loop"？
就目前情况而言，这个问题不太适合我们的问答形式。我们希望答案得到事实、引用资料或专业知识的支持，但这个问题可能会引发辩论、争论、民意调查或扩展讨论。如果您觉得这个问题可以改进并可能重新开放，visit
C# If loop within a for loop within a if loop
如果可以的话，我想减少这段代码: class Alarm { internal static void isGreaterThanOrBelowValue(int min, int max,
loops - 批处理 - "for/F loop"内部 "for/L loop"
我有以下问题: 我想创建一个批处理文件，循环访问一定数量的 IP 地址，以停止远程 PC 上的某个服务。因为停止过程需要一些时间，所以我需要第二个循环来查询服务的状态并等待，直到服务达到“已停止”状
loops - loop{} 运行了两次？
我已经完整地编写了“The Rust Programming Language”在线书籍中的程序，chapter 2 .我还进一步开发了它:通过添加一个简单的问题/响应，用户可以通过输入“y”再次玩游
loops - clojure for loop，将值存储在集合或映射中
这个人已经困扰了我一阵子了，我们应该如何在集合中存储值或在for循环中映射？ (let [s #{}] (for [ i (range 10) j (range 1
loops - x86 LOOP 指令究竟是如何工作的？
mov ecx, 16 looptop: . . . loop looptop 这个循环会执行多少次？如果 ecx
for-loop - XTend For-Loop 支持和添加范围支持
我似乎无法找到一种在 Xtend 中表达以下内容而不诉诸 while 循环的好方法: for(int i = 0; i range(int stop) { range(0, stop) }
loops - x86 程序集 : Loops!
好吧，长话短说，我正在学习汇编，我正在尝试循环打印出 ascii 字符“0”-“9”。因此，我完成了我在示例中看到的所有基础知识，例如使用 pushad 和 popad 保存寄存器状态，分配堆栈空间，
javascript - 有没有办法制作 "for loop of for loops"？
我正在尝试为自己编写一个扑克计算器，我有一个 5 级深的 for 循环。为此，我将 for 循环一个接一个地嵌套。我正在寻找一种方法来简单地使用一个循环(或函数)，它可以告诉我想去多少层。对于这个例
python - for loop in for loop 的更快替代方案
我有一本包含约 150,000 个键的字典。没有重复的键。每个 key 的长度为 127 个字符，每个 key 在 1-11 个位置上有所不同(大多数差异发生在 key 的末尾)。每个键的值是一个唯一
loops - 在 (LOOP FOR A ...) 的宏扩展期间出错
我正在尝试编写一个 Lisp 程序来实现与点和方 block 非常相似的棋盘游戏，这意味着我有两个玩家相互竞争但可以连续移动。我正在尝试实现最简单的 minimax 算法来实现这一点，没有 alpha
算法时间复杂度分析(for loop with inner while loop)
下面是我实现的代码的简要说明。 for 循环的复杂度应该是 O(n)。我只是无法弄清楚内部 while 循环的时间复杂度。 int x,n; // Inputted by the user.
loops - "Infinite loop"导致无法访问的代码
我目前正在尝试使用 html 分词器 https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/net/html . 所以我想做的是:从 url 获取所有链接，如果 url 包含特定字符串 ->
shell 脚本 : for-loop within while loop
我有 32 个文件(以相同的模式命名，唯一的区别是下面写的 $sample 编号)我想分成 4 个文件夹。我正在尝试使用以下脚本来完成这项工作，但该脚本无法正常工作，有人可以帮我使用以下 shell
loops - 动态 WHERE 子句 IN LOOP AT 语句
我必须根据 where 条件在我的内部表上做一个循环，但根据我的程序模式，必须在运行时修改 where 条件的字段。我知道在 SELECT 语句中这是可能的，但是当我在循环中执行此操作时出现错误。
KDB/Q : how to loop without loops?
我正在学习关于kdb数据库的q。我担心q中没有循环。我需要写一个算法，用像C这样的冗长程序在几个嵌套的for循环中编写。但是在q中，我被无法循环的事实所困扰。仅举一个具体的例子(很多)，我有一个简
haskell - 循环 StateT : Why this loop doesn't loop
我不明白为什么这段代码只循环一次然后退出？在 Ghci 中，我只能回答第一个循环，然后似乎变量 cont 设置为 false 并且我没有提示回答。结果是: *Main> testLoop1 td1
for-loop - 在 Racket "for loop"中做两件事
我正在 Racket 中运行 for 循环，对于列表中的每个对象，我想执行两件事:如果该项目满足条件，(1) 将其附加到我的新列表中，(2) 然后打印列表。但我不知道如何在 Racket 中执行此操作
for-loop - Matlab并行工具箱: stacking loops in parfor
我正在尝试使用 matlab 并行包中的 parfor 循环。我和这个人有类似的问题:MATLAB parfor slicing issue? 。输出矩阵似乎没有被识别为切片变量。在我的具体情况下，我

可可西里

个人简介

我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀！

作者热门文章

滴滴打车优惠券免费领取

全站热门文章

首页

博学

6Ren·AI

商城

iphone - run loop/drawRect 中神秘的 "progressive slowing"问题