windows - 远程计算机上的传输速度慢

Question

嘿，StackOverflow 的 friend 们!

我正在制作一个 IOCP 服务器，到目前为止我已经解决了大部分问题，但仍然存在一个问题，我不知道从哪里开始研究。当我在我的机器上运行客户端/服务器时，一切都很好。它与 Windows SDK 示例的速度相匹配，可能更快一点，而且肯定使用更少的 CPU 周期。但是，当我从另一台计算机运行客户端时，传输速度上限为 37 KB/s，往返延迟为 200 毫秒(而不是 0)。现在，如果我将客户端连接到 SDK 示例服务器，我就没有那个问题，所以我的代码有问题。据我所知，套接字的初始化方式完全相同，选项也相同。我还在分析器中运行我的服务器以检查瓶颈，但我找不到任何瓶颈。此外，我试过的计算机都连接到同一个千兆交换机(带有千兆适配器)。我知道这有点含糊，但那是因为到目前为止我无法查明问题所在，如果你们中的任何人能指出我正确的方向，我将永远感激不已。

干杯，

-乐声

编辑2:在听从 Mike 的建议后，我对代码做了一些研究，发现当远程客户端连接到服务器时，大部分时间代码都在等待 GetQueuedCompletionStatus。这表明 IO 请求只是需要很长时间才能完成，但我仍然不明白为什么。这仅在客户端位于远程计算机上时才会发生。我认为这与套接字的设置方式或我发布请求的方式有关，但我看不出与示例代码有任何区别。

有什么想法吗？

编辑(添加示例代码):

好吧，就是它了!虽然它并不漂亮!

如果您安装了 Windows SDK，您可以使用 iocpclient 示例 (Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.1\Samples\netds\winsock\iocp\client) 连接到它并更改它的默认端口73 到 5000。

我在自己尝试时刚刚注意到的奇怪事情是，示例 iocpclient 似乎不会在 37KB/s 问题上导致相同的上限...但是，示例代码的限制似乎设置为大约 800KB/秒。如果有任何帮助，我会发布一个客户端。

#pragma comment(lib, "Ws2_32.lib")

#include <WinSock2.h>
#include <stdio.h>

unsigned int connection = 0;
unsigned int upload = 0;
unsigned int download = 0;

#define IO_CONTEXT_COUNT 5

class NetClientHost
{
friend class gNetProtocolHost;
public:
enum Operation
{
    kOperationUnknown,
    kOperationRead,
    kOperationWrite,
};

struct ClientData
{
    SOCKET           socket;
};

struct IOContext
{
    WSAOVERLAPPED    overlapped;
    WSABUF           wsaReceiveBuf;
    WSABUF           wsaSendBuf;
    char            *buf;
    char            *TESTbuf;
    unsigned long    bytesReceived;
    unsigned long    bytesSent;
    unsigned long    flags;
    unsigned int     bytesToSendTotal;
    unsigned int     remainingBytesToSend;
    unsigned int     chunk;
    Operation        operation;
};

NetClientHost()
{
    memset((void *) &m_clientData, 0, sizeof(m_clientData));
}

NetClientHost::IOContext *NetClientHost::AcquireContext()
{
    while (true)
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < IO_CONTEXT_COUNT; ++i)
        {
            if (!(m_ioContexts + i)->inUse)
            {
                InterlockedIncrement(&(m_ioContexts + i)->inUse);
                //ResetEvent(*(m_hContextEvents + i));

                if ((m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.TESTbuf == 0)
                    Sleep(1);

                return &(m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext;
            }
        }
        //++g_blockOnPool;
        //WaitForMultipleObjects(IO_CONTEXT_COUNT, m_hContextEvents, FALSE, INFINITE);
    }   
}

const ClientData *NetClientHost::GetClientData() const
{
    return &m_clientData;
};

void NetClientHost::Init(unsigned int bufferSize)
{   
    _InitializeIOContexts(bufferSize ? bufferSize : 1024);
}

void NetClientHost::ReleaseContext(IOContext *ioContext)
{
    int i = sizeof(_IOContextData), j = sizeof(IOContext);
    _IOContextData *contextData = (_IOContextData *) (((char *) ioContext) - (i - j));
    InterlockedDecrement(&contextData->inUse);
    //SetEvent(*(m_hContextEvents + contextData->index));
}   

struct _IOContextData
{
    unsigned int index;
    volatile long inUse;        
    IOContext ioContext;
};

ClientData                    m_clientData;
_IOContextData               *m_ioContexts;
HANDLE                       *m_hContextEvents;

void _InitializeIOContexts(unsigned int bufferSize)
{
    m_ioContexts = new _IOContextData[IO_CONTEXT_COUNT];
    m_hContextEvents = new HANDLE[IO_CONTEXT_COUNT];

    memset((void *) m_ioContexts, 0, sizeof(_IOContextData) * IO_CONTEXT_COUNT);

    for (int i = 0; i < IO_CONTEXT_COUNT; ++i)
    {
        (m_ioContexts + i)->index = i;

        (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.buf = new char[bufferSize];
        (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.wsaReceiveBuf.len = bufferSize;
        (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.wsaReceiveBuf.buf = (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.buf;
        (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.TESTbuf = new char[10000];
        (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.wsaSendBuf.buf = (m_ioContexts + i)->ioContext.TESTbuf;

        *(m_hContextEvents + i) = CreateEvent(0, TRUE, FALSE, 0);
    }
}
void _SetSocket(SOCKET socket)
{
    m_clientData.socket = socket;
}
};



bool WriteChunk(const NetClientHost *clientHost, NetClientHost::IOContext *ioContext)
{
int status;

status = WSASend(clientHost->GetClientData()->socket, &ioContext->wsaSendBuf, 1, &ioContext->bytesSent, ioContext->flags, &ioContext->overlapped, 0);
if (status == SOCKET_ERROR && WSAGetLastError() != WSA_IO_PENDING)
{
    // ...
    return false;
}

return true;
}

bool Write(NetClientHost *clientHost, void *buffer, unsigned int size, unsigned int chunk)
{
//__ASSERT(m_clientHost);
//__ASSERT(m_clientHost->GetClientData()->remainingBytesToSend == 0);

NetClientHost::IOContext *ioContext = clientHost->AcquireContext();

if (!chunk)
    chunk = size;

ioContext->wsaSendBuf.buf = ioContext->TESTbuf;

ioContext->operation                = NetClientHost::kOperationWrite;
ioContext->flags                    = 0;
ioContext->wsaSendBuf.buf = new char[size];
memcpy((void *) ioContext->wsaSendBuf.buf, buffer, chunk);
ioContext->wsaSendBuf.len           = chunk;    
ioContext->chunk                    = chunk;
ioContext->bytesToSendTotal         = size;
ioContext->remainingBytesToSend     = size;

return WriteChunk(clientHost, ioContext);
}



void Read(NetClientHost *clientHost)
{   
NetClientHost::IOContext *ioContext = clientHost->AcquireContext();
int status;

memset((void *) ioContext, 0, sizeof(NetClientHost::IOContext));
ioContext->buf = new char[1024];
ioContext->wsaReceiveBuf.len = 1024;
ioContext->wsaReceiveBuf.buf = ioContext->buf;

ioContext->flags = 0;
ioContext->operation = NetClientHost::kOperationRead;

status = WSARecv(clientHost->GetClientData()->socket, &ioContext->wsaReceiveBuf, 1, &ioContext->bytesReceived, &ioContext->flags, &ioContext->overlapped, 0);
int i = WSAGetLastError();
if (status == SOCKET_ERROR && WSAGetLastError() != WSA_IO_PENDING)
{
    // ...
}   
}

bool AddSocket(HANDLE hIOCP, SOCKET socket)
{
++connection;

int bufSize = 0;
LINGER lingerStruct;
lingerStruct.l_onoff = 1;
lingerStruct.l_linger = 0;
setsockopt(socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, (char *) &bufSize, sizeof(int));
setsockopt(socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, (char *) &bufSize, sizeof(int));
setsockopt(socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, (char *) &lingerStruct, sizeof(lingerStruct) ); 

NetClientHost *clientHost = new NetClientHost;

clientHost->_InitializeIOContexts(1024);
clientHost->Init(0);
clientHost->_SetSocket(socket);

// Add this socket to the IO Completion Port
CreateIoCompletionPort((HANDLE) socket, hIOCP, (DWORD_PTR) clientHost, 0);

Read(clientHost);
return true;
}

int read = 0, write = 0;

DWORD WINAPI WorkerThread(LPVOID param)
{
LPOVERLAPPED overlapped;
NetClientHost *clientHost;
HANDLE hIOCP = (HANDLE) param;
DWORD ioSize;
BOOL status;

while (true)
{
    status = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(hIOCP, &ioSize, (PULONG_PTR) &clientHost, (LPOVERLAPPED *) &overlapped, INFINITE);

    if (!(status || ioSize))
    {
        --connection;
        //_CloseConnection(clientHost);
        continue;
    }

    NetClientHost::IOContext *ioContext = (NetClientHost::IOContext *) overlapped;

    switch (ioContext->operation)
    {
    case NetClientHost::kOperationRead:
        download += ioSize;
        Write(clientHost, ioContext->wsaReceiveBuf.buf, ioSize, 0);
        write++;
        clientHost->ReleaseContext(ioContext);
        break;

    case NetClientHost::kOperationWrite:
        upload += ioSize;
        if (ioContext->remainingBytesToSend)
        {
            ioContext->remainingBytesToSend -= ioSize;
            ioContext->wsaSendBuf.len = ioContext->chunk <= ioContext->remainingBytesToSend ? ioContext->chunk : ioContext->remainingBytesToSend; // equivalent to min(clientData->chunk, clientData->remainingBytesToSend);
            ioContext->wsaSendBuf.buf += ioContext->wsaSendBuf.len;
        }

        if (ioContext->remainingBytesToSend)
        {       
            WriteChunk(clientHost, ioContext);
        }
        else
        {
            clientHost->ReleaseContext(ioContext);              
            Read(clientHost);
            read++;
        }
        break;
    }
}

return 0;
}

DWORD WINAPI ListenThread(LPVOID param)
{
SOCKET sdListen = (SOCKET) param;

HANDLE hIOCP = CreateIoCompletionPort(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, 0, 0, 0);
CreateThread(0, 0, WorkerThread, hIOCP, 0, 0);
CreateThread(0, 0, WorkerThread, hIOCP, 0, 0);
CreateThread(0, 0, WorkerThread, hIOCP, 0, 0);
CreateThread(0, 0, WorkerThread, hIOCP, 0, 0);

while (true)
{
    SOCKET as = WSAAccept(sdListen, 0, 0, 0, 0);
    if (as != INVALID_SOCKET)
        AddSocket(hIOCP, as);
}
}

int main()
{
SOCKET      sdListen;
SOCKADDR_IN si_addrlocal;   
int         nRet;   
int         nZero = 0;   
LINGER      lingerStruct;   

WSADATA wsaData;
WSAStartup(0x202, &wsaData);

sdListen = WSASocket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP, NULL, 0, WSA_FLAG_OVERLAPPED);    
si_addrlocal.sin_family = AF_INET;   
si_addrlocal.sin_port = htons(5000);   
si_addrlocal.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);          
nRet = bind(sdListen, (struct sockaddr *)&si_addrlocal, sizeof(si_addrlocal));   
nRet = listen(sdListen, 5);

nZero = 0;   
nRet = setsockopt(sdListen, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, (char *) &nZero, sizeof(nZero));   
nZero = 0;   
nRet = setsockopt(sdListen, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, (char *)&nZero, sizeof(nZero));
lingerStruct.l_onoff = 1;   
lingerStruct.l_linger = 0; 
nRet = setsockopt(sdListen, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, (char *)&lingerStruct, sizeof(lingerStruct) );

CreateThread(0, 0, ListenThread, (LPVOID) sdListen, 0, 0);

HANDLE console = GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE);
while (true)
{
    COORD c = {0};
    SetConsoleCursorPosition(console, c);
    printf("Connections: %i                      \nUpload: %iKB/s               \nDownload: %iKB/s              ", connection, upload * 2 / 1024, download * 2 / 1024);
    upload = 0;
    download = 0;
    Sleep(500);
}



return 0;
}

Answer 1

这种异步系统应该能够以全数据链路速度运行。我发现错误的问题是:

• 导致不必要重传的超时设置
• 在接收过程中，接收到的消息 A 可能会触发数据库更新，这样接收到的消息 B 必须等待，从而导致对消息 B 返回给发送者的响应出现不必要的延迟，而实际上数据库更新可以在空闲时间。

wireshark 可以让您了解消息流量。我过去常常使用带时间戳的消息日志来做这件事。

顺便说一句:我会先使用 this method在各个进程上，在进行异步分析之前清除任何瓶颈。如果你还没有这样做，你可以打赌他们在那里。只是任何旧的分析器都不可靠。有好的，包括Zoom .