gpt4 book ai didi

java - 使用堆栈和队列对数组进行排序

转载 作者:搜寻专家 更新时间:2023-10-31 08:12:15 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我需要创建一个方法,使用堆栈和队列对整数数组进行排序。例如,如果给定 [-1, 7, 0, 3, -2] -> [-2, -1, 0, 3, 7]。我完全不知道如何做这个问题,因为我只会使用排序方法,但是对于这个问题,我不允许这样做。任何人都可以解释如何使用堆栈和队列执行此操作吗?

最佳答案

许多快速排序算法(例如合并排序和快速排序)can be implemented efficiently on linked lists通过使用您可以有效地将单链表视为堆栈(通过将元素添加到前面)或队列(通过将元素添加到后面)这一事实。因此,解决此问题的一种可能方法是采用其中一种排序算法,并将其视为对链表而不是正常序列进行排序。

例如,这是您可以使用队列实现归并排序的一种简单方法。我写这个是为了对 Integer 进行排序,但这可以很容易地扩展以处理其他类型:

public void mergesort(Queue<Integer> sequence) {
/* Base case: Any 0- or 1-element sequence is trivially sorted. */
if (sequence.size() <= 1) return;

/* Otherwise, split the sequence in half. */
Queue<Integer> left = new LinkedList<Integer>(),
right = new LinkedList<Integer>();
while (!sequence.isEmpty()) {
left.add(sequence.remove());
if (!sequence.isEmpty()) {
right.add(sequence.remove());
}
}

/* Recursively sort both halves. */
mergesort(left);
mergesort(right);

/* Merge them back together. */
merge(left, right, sequence);
}

private void merge(Queue<Integer> one, Queue<Integer> two,
Queue<Integer> result) {
/* Keep choosing the smaller element. */
while (!one.isEmpty() && !two.isEmpty()) {
if (one.peek() < two.peek()) {
result.add(one.remove());
} else {
result.add(two.remove());
}
}

/* Add all elements from the second queue to the result. */
while (!one.isEmpty()) {
result.add(one.remove());
}
while (!two.isEmpty()) {
result.add(two.remove());
}
}

总的来说,这将在 O(n log n) 时间内运行,这是渐近最优的。

或者,您可以使用快速排序,如下所示:

public void quicksort(Queue<Integer> sequence) {
/* Base case: Any 0- or 1-element sequence is trivially sorted. */
if (sequence.size() <= 1) return;

/* Choose the first element as the pivot (causes O(n^2) worst-case behavior,
* but for now should work out fine. Then, split the list into three groups,
* one of elements smaller than the pivot, one of elements equal to the
* pivot, and one of elements greater than the pivot.
*/
Queue<Integer> pivot = new LinkedList<Integer>(),
less = new LinkedList<Integer>(),
more = new LinkedList<Integer>();

/* Place the pivot into its list. */
pivot.add(sequence.remove());

/* Distribute elements into the queues. */
while (!sequence.isEmpty()) {
Integer elem = sequence.remove();
if (elem < pivot.peek()) less.add(elem);
else if (elem > pivot.peek()) more.add(elem);
else pivot.add(elem);
}

/* Sort the less and greater groups. */
quicksort(less);
quicksort(more);

/* Combine everything back together by writing out the smaller
* elements, then the equal elements, then the greater elements.
*/
while (!less.isEmpty()) result.add(less.remove());
while (!pivot.isEmpty()) result.add(pivot.remove());
while (!more.isEmpty()) result.add(more.remove());
}

这在最佳情况下运行 O(n log n) 时间,在最坏情况下运行 O(n2) 时间。对于一个有趣的练习,尝试让它随机选择枢轴以获得预期的 O(n log n) 运行时间。 :-)

对于一种完全不同的方法,您可以考虑对值进行最低有效数字基数排序,因为您知道它们都是整数:

public void radixSort(Queue<Integer> sequence) {
/* Make queues for values with a 0 in the current position and values with a
* 1 in the current position. It's an optimization to put these out here;
* they honestly could be declared inside the loop below.
*/
Queue<Integer> zero = new LinkedList<Integer>(),
one = new LinkedList<Integer>();

/* We're going to need 32 rounds of this, since there are 32 bits in each
* integer.
*/
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
/* Distribute all elements from the input queue into the zero and one
* queue based on their bits.
*/
while (!sequence.isEmpty()) {
Integer curr = sequence.remove();

/* Determine whether the current bit of the number is 0 or 1 and
* place the element into the appropriate queue.
*/
if ((curr >>> i) % 2 == 0) {
zero.add(curr);
} else {
one.add(curr);
}
}

/* Combine the elements from the queues back together. As a quick
* note - if this is the 31st bit, we want to put back the 1 elements
* BEFORE the 0 elements, since the sign bit is reversed.
*/
if (i == 31) {
Queue<Integer> temp = zero;
zero = one;
one = temp;
}
while (!zero.isEmpty()) result.add(zero.remove());
while (!one.isEmpty()) result.add(one.remove());
}
}

这将在 O(n log U) 时间内运行,其中 U 是可以存储在 int 中的最大可能值。

当然,所有这些算法都是高效而优雅的。但是,有时您会想要进行缓慢且不优雅的排序,例如 bogosort .现在,bogosort 有点难以实现,因为它通常需要您打乱输入序列,这在数组上更容易做到。然而,我们可以模拟如下洗牌队列:

  • 在队列中选择一个随机索引。
  • 循环遍历那么多元素。
  • 从队列中删除该元素并将其添加到结果中。
  • 重复。

这最终花费的时间为 O(n2) 而不是 O(n),这具有使 bogosort 花费预期时间 O(n2 &mdot; n!) 而不是 O(n &mdot; n!)。然而,这是我们必须付出的代价。

public void bogosort(Queue<Integer> sequence, Random r) {
while (!isSorted(sequence)) {
permute(sequence, r);
}
}

/* Checking if a sequence is sorted is tricky because we have to destructively modify
* the queue. Our process will be to cycle the elements of the sequence making sure
* that each element is greater than or equal to the previous element.
*
* Because we are using bogosort, it's totally fine for us to destructively modify
* the queue as long as all elements that were in the original input queue end up
* in the resulting queue. We'll do this by cycling forward through the elements
* and stopping if we find something mismatched.
*/
private void isSorted(Queue<Integer> sequence) {
int last = Integer.MIN_VALUE;

for (int i = 0; i < sequence.size(); i++) {
int curr = sequence.remove();
sequence.add(curr);

if (curr < last) return false;
}
return true;
}

/* Randomly permutes the elements of the given queue. */
private void permute(Queue<Integer> sequence, Random r) {
/* Buffer queue to hold the result. */
Queue<Integer> result = new LinkedList<Integer>();

/* Continuously pick a random element and add it. */
while (!sequence.isEmpty()) {
/* Choose a random index and cycle forward that many times. */
int index = r.nextInt(sequence.size());
for (int i = 0; i < index; i++) {
sequence.add(sequence.remove());
}
/* Add the front element to the result. */
result.add(sequence.remove());
}

/* Transfer the permutation back into the sequence. */
while (!result.isEmpty()) sequence.add(result.remove());
}

希望这对您有所帮助!

关于java - 使用堆栈和队列对数组进行排序,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17243095/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com