- Java 双重比较
- java - 比较器与 Apache BeanComparator
- Objective-C 完成 block 导致额外的方法调用?
- database - RESTful URI 是否应该公开数据库主键?
我一直在为我的一个数据结构分配内存时遇到问题。它总是崩溃,但并不总是在同一个地方。我怀疑我试图将它分配到已经存在的东西之上,但我真的不确定如何判断实际发生了什么或如何修复它 - 我已经尝试安装 valgrind,但是尚不支持 Mac OS 10.10。
这是调用函数的代码。
stet::file f1;
f1.set_path("test/longfile1.txt"); // a file with almost 2 million lines
f1.read();
std::string all_text = f1.get_contents();
std::vector<chunk *> chunks = populate_chunks(all_text);
这些是我的数据结构——想法是将文件中的文本分成固定大小的 block ,这些 block 最多填充 75% 的容量,但我似乎无法创建所有 block 。
struct line {
std::string text;
};
struct chunk {
line *lines[MAX_CHUNK_SIZE];
};
这就是我噩梦的原因 - 它在所有评论下方的行中崩溃。
std::vector<chunk *> populate_chunks(std::string &text) {
std::vector<std::string> all_lines;
boost::split(all_lines, text, boost::is_any_of("\n"));
size_t num_lines = all_lines.size();
std::vector<chunk *> chunks = std::vector<chunk *>( (num_lines / START_CHUNK_SIZE) * 2 );
size_t next_line_num;
for(size_t line_num = 0; line_num < num_lines; line_num = next_line_num) {
next_line_num = line_num + START_CHUNK_SIZE;
std::cout << line_num << std::endl;
chunk *c = new chunk;
chunks.push_back(c);
// This always falls over, but not always at the same point in the file.
// Never seems to be the first time. Observed range: 3072 - 59904
// Error always looks something like this:
// text(71184,0x7fff77699300) malloc: *** error for object 0x7ff389006208: incorrect checksum for freed object - object was probably modified after being freed.
// *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
for(size_t i = 0; i < next_line_num; ++i) {
line *l = new line;
l->text = all_lines[line_num+i];
c->lines[i] = l;
}
}
return chunks;
}
如果有人有任何想法,他们将不胜感激 - 应该指出的是,我是 C++ 的新手,所以很可能我错过了一些非常愚蠢的事情。
更新:
我根据收到的评论修改了代码:
宏观值(value)观:
#define MAX_CHUNK_SIZE 1024
#define START_CHUNK_SIZE MAX_CHUNK_SIZE * 0.75
上述更改后的 Valgrind 输出:
==24468== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==24468== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==24468== Using Valgrind-3.9.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==24468== Command: bin/text
==24468==
==24468== Invalid write of size 8
==24468== at 0x402907: populate_chunks(std::string&) (text_storage.cc:125)
==24468== by 0x402ADF: main (text_storage.cc:173)
==24468== Address 0x216b5640 is 0 bytes after a block of size 8,192 alloc'd
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x402888: populate_chunks(std::string&) (text_storage.cc:113)
==24468== by 0x402ADF: main (text_storage.cc:173)
==24468==
==24468==
==24468== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==24468== Access not within mapped region at address 0x37D77000
==24468== at 0x402907: populate_chunks(std::string&) (text_storage.cc:125)
==24468== by 0x402ADF: main (text_storage.cc:173)
==24468== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==24468== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==24468== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==24468== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==24468== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==24468==
==24468== HEAP SUMMARY:
==24468== in use at exit: 371,641,698 bytes in 6,241,143 blocks
==24468== total heap usage: 6,241,190 allocs, 47 frees, 656,880,685 bytes allocated
==24468==
==24468== 16 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x4028BC: populate_chunks(std::string&) (text_storage.cc:123)
==24468== by 0x402ADF: main (text_storage.cc:173)
==24468==
==24468== 43 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 2 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x5340048: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x5341900: char* std::string::_S_construct<char const*>(char const*, char const*, std::allocator<char> const&, std::forward_iterator_tag) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x5341D37: std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(char const*, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x4029F7: main (text_storage.cc:138)
==24468==
==24468== 35,727,800 (33,173,592 direct, 2,554,208 indirect) bytes in 4,146,699 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x4028BC: populate_chunks(std::string&) (text_storage.cc:123)
==24468== by 0x402ADF: main (text_storage.cc:173)
==24468==
==24468== 93,350,023 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 9 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x5340048: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x5340235: std::string::_M_mutate(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x53403C5: std::string::_M_leak_hard() (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x5340412: std::string::begin() (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x407728: boost::range_iterator<std::string>::type boost::range_detail::range_begin<std::string>(std::string&) (begin.hpp:49)
==24468== by 0x40705D: boost::range_iterator<std::string>::type boost::range_adl_barrier::begin<std::string>(std::string&) (begin.hpp:108)
==24468== by 0x4066FC: __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> boost::iterator_range_detail::iterator_range_impl<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >::adl_begin<std::string>(std::string&) (iterator_range_core.hpp:58)
==24468== by 0x40601A: boost::iterator_range<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >::iterator_range<std::string>(std::string&, boost::iterator_range_detail::range_tag) (iterator_range_core.hpp:207)
==24468== by 0x40561F: boost::iterator_range<boost::range_iterator<std::string>::type> boost::make_iterator_range<std::string>(std::string&) (iterator_range_core.hpp:559)
==24468== by 0x404BC3: boost::iterator_range<boost::range_iterator<std::string>::type> boost::range_detail::make_range<std::string>(std::string&, long) (as_literal.hpp:93)
==24468== by 0x4040E5: boost::iterator_range<boost::range_iterator<std::string>::type> boost::as_literal<std::string>(std::string&) (as_literal.hpp:102)
==24468==
==24468== 93,351,904 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 10 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x5340048: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x5341710: char* std::string::_S_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::allocator<char> const&, std::forward_iterator_tag) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x531F9A7: std::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::str() const (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x402523: stet::file::read() (file.cc:50)
==24468== by 0x402A2E: main (text_storage.cc:139)
==24468==
==24468== 129,441,960 bytes in 1,520,226 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 11 of 11
==24468== at 0x4C27965: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==24468== by 0x5340048: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
==24468== by 0x40845E: char* std::string::_S_construct<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, std::allocator<char> const&, std::forward_iterator_tag) (basic_string.tcc:138)
==24468== by 0x4082E8: char* std::string::_S_construct_aux<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, std::allocator<char> const&, std::__false_type) (basic_string.h:1725)
==24468== by 0x408177: char* std::string::_S_construct<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, std::allocator<char> const&) (basic_string.h:1746)
==24468== by 0x407FDA: std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string>, std::allocator<char> const&) (basic_string.tcc:229)
==24468== by 0x407D6A: std::string boost::copy_range<std::string, boost::iterator_range<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> > >(boost::iterator_range<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> > const&) (iterator_range_core.hpp:643)
==24468== by 0x407AEA: boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >::operator()(boost::iterator_range<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> > const&) const (util.hpp:97)
==24468== by 0x407395: boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default>::dereference() const (transform_iterator.hpp:121)
==24468== by 0x406B72: boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default>::reference boost::iterator_core_access::dereference<boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default> >(boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default> const&) (iterator_facade.hpp:514)
==24468== by 0x40633D: boost::iterator_facade<boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default>, std::string, boost::forward_traversal_tag, std::string, long>::operator*() const (iterator_facade.hpp:639)
==24468== by 0x405895: void std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> >::_M_range_initialize<boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default> >(boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default>, boost::transform_iterator<boost::algorithm::detail::copy_iterator_rangeF<std::string, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::algorithm::split_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::string> >, boost::use_default, boost::use_default>, std::input_iterator_tag) (stl_vector.h:1188)
==24468==
==24468== LEAK SUMMARY:
==24468== definitely lost: 33,173,592 bytes in 4,146,699 blocks
==24468== indirectly lost: 2,554,208 bytes in 319,276 blocks
==24468== possibly lost: 316,143,946 bytes in 1,520,231 blocks
==24468== still reachable: 19,769,952 bytes in 254,937 blocks
==24468== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==24468== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==24468== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==24468==
==24468== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==24468== ERROR SUMMARY: 4146708 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)
最佳答案
lines
的大小chunk
中的数组是MAX_CHUNK_SIZE
,但是除了第一次之外,您在任何迭代中访问它的次数都远远超过了它。你的循环是 for(size_t i = 0; i < next_line_num; ++i)
, 你猜怎么着 next_line_num
在你的第二次(及以后)迭代中?
如果您想到另一个您忽略的问题,您可能会完全避免这个问题。您仅部分填充 block (75%),这是有道理的。但是在最后一次迭代中,您的行数可能比填充 75% block 所需的行数更少。因此,在某处应该有一个测试来处理这个边界。在该循环的某处与 num_lines
进行比较.考虑将它放在哪里可能(但不一定会)提醒您迭代索引没有按照您的预期进行。
尝试 for(size_t i = 0; i < START_CHUNK_SIZE && line_num+i < num_lines; ++i)
.
关于c++ - 分配内存损坏,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26547437/
#include using namespace std; class C{ private: int value; public: C(){ value = 0;
这个问题已经有答案了: What is the difference between char a[] = ?string?; and char *p = ?string?;? (8 个回答) 已关闭
关闭。此题需要details or clarity 。目前不接受答案。 想要改进这个问题吗?通过 editing this post 添加详细信息并澄清问题. 已关闭 7 年前。 此帖子已于 8 个月
除了调试之外,是否有任何针对 c、c++ 或 c# 的测试工具,其工作原理类似于将独立函数复制粘贴到某个文本框,然后在其他文本框中输入参数? 最佳答案 也许您会考虑单元测试。我推荐你谷歌测试和谷歌模拟
我想在第二台显示器中移动一个窗口 (HWND)。问题是我尝试了很多方法,例如将分辨率加倍或输入负值,但它永远无法将窗口放在我的第二台显示器上。 关于如何在 C/C++/c# 中执行此操作的任何线索 最
我正在寻找 C/C++/C## 中不同类型 DES 的现有实现。我的运行平台是Windows XP/Vista/7。 我正在尝试编写一个 C# 程序,它将使用 DES 算法进行加密和解密。我需要一些实
很难说出这里要问什么。这个问题模棱两可、含糊不清、不完整、过于宽泛或夸夸其谈,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开,visit the help center . 关闭 1
有没有办法强制将另一个 窗口置于顶部? 不是应用程序的窗口,而是另一个已经在系统上运行的窗口。 (Windows, C/C++/C#) 最佳答案 SetWindowPos(that_window_ha
假设您可以在 C/C++ 或 Csharp 之间做出选择,并且您打算在 Windows 和 Linux 服务器上运行同一服务器的多个实例,那么构建套接字服务器应用程序的最明智选择是什么? 最佳答案 如
你们能告诉我它们之间的区别吗? 顺便问一下,有什么叫C++库或C库的吗? 最佳答案 C++ 标准库 和 C 标准库 是 C++ 和 C 标准定义的库,提供给 C++ 和 C 程序使用。那是那些词的共同
下面的测试代码,我将输出信息放在注释中。我使用的是 gcc 4.8.5 和 Centos 7.2。 #include #include class C { public:
很难说出这里问的是什么。这个问题是含糊的、模糊的、不完整的、过于宽泛的或修辞性的,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开它,visit the help center 。 已关
我的客户将使用名为 annoucement 的结构/类与客户通信。我想我会用 C++ 编写服务器。会有很多不同的类继承annoucement。我的问题是通过网络将这些类发送给客户端 我想也许我应该使用
我在 C# 中有以下函数: public Matrix ConcatDescriptors(IList> descriptors) { int cols = descriptors[0].Co
我有一个项目要编写一个函数来对某些数据执行某些操作。我可以用 C/C++ 编写代码,但我不想与雇主共享该函数的代码。相反,我只想让他有权在他自己的代码中调用该函数。是否可以?我想到了这两种方法 - 在
我使用的是编写糟糕的第 3 方 (C/C++) Api。我从托管代码(C++/CLI)中使用它。有时会出现“访问冲突错误”。这使整个应用程序崩溃。我知道我无法处理这些错误[如果指针访问非法内存位置等,
关闭。这个问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。 我们不允许提问寻求书籍、工具、软件库等的推荐。您可以编辑问题,以便用事实和引用来回答。 关闭 7 年前。
已关闭。此问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines 。目前不接受答案。 要求我们推荐或查找工具、库或最喜欢的场外资源的问题对于 Stack Overflow 来说是偏离主题的,因为
我有一些 C 代码,将使用 P/Invoke 从 C# 调用。我正在尝试为这个 C 函数定义一个 C# 等效项。 SomeData* DoSomething(); struct SomeData {
这个问题已经有答案了: Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? (14 个回答) 已关闭 6
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!