- Java 双重比较
- java - 比较器与 Apache BeanComparator
- Objective-C 完成 block 导致额外的方法调用?
- database - RESTful URI 是否应该公开数据库主键?
class Base{};
class D1:virtual public Base{};
class D2:virtual public Base{};
class DD:public D1,public D2{};
int main(){
Base *pBase=new DD;
delete pBase;
}
这会导致崩溃,但我修改如下:
class Base{
public:
virtual ~Base(){};
};
class D1:virtual public Base{
public:
virtual ~D1(){}
};
class D2:virtual public Base{
public:
virtual ~D2(){}
};
class DD:public D1,public D2{
};
然后,它通过了,但是默认的析构函数应该是虚拟伪函数,不是吗?
最佳答案
来自 C++11 规范 (ISO/IEC 14882:2011(E)),第 12.4 节析构函数 [class.dtor]:
第 4 小节:
If a class has no user-declared destructor, a destructor is implicitly declared as defaulted (8.4). An implicitly-declared destructor is an inline public member of its class.
第 6 小节:
A destructor that is defaulted and not defined as deleted is implicitly defined when it is odr-used (3.2) to destroy an object of its class type (3.7) or when it is explicitly defaulted after its first declaration.
最后是第 9 小节:
A destructor can be declared virtual (10.3) or pure virtual (10.4); if any objects of that class or any derived class are created in the program, the destructor shall be defined. If a class has a base class with a virtual destructor, its destructor (whether user- or implicitly-declared) is virtual.
在最后引述中强调我的。
如果基类有虚析构函数,编译器只会生成一个虚析构函数。如果基类没有虚拟析构函数,如第一个示例中的 Base
,则子类将没有虚拟析构函数。如果一个类没有基类,编译器生成的析构函数将不是虚拟的。
关于c++ - 虚继承中的析构函数,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36760797/
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!