gpt4 book ai didi

c# - 你能说服 DataContext 将列视为总是脏的吗?

转载 作者:太空狗 更新时间:2023-10-29 18:26:09 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

有没有办法强制 LINQ-to-SQL 将列视为脏列?在全局范围内就足够了......

基本上,我在与 L2S 交谈的遗留系统上遇到了一些审计代码的问题,想象一下:

var ctx = new SomeDataContext(); // disposed etc - keeping it simple for illustration
var cust = ctx.Customers.First(); // just for illustration
cust.SomeRandomProperty = 17; // whatever
cust.LastUpdated = DateTime.UtcNowl;
cust.UpdatedBy = currentUser;
ctx.SubmitChanges(); // uses auto-generated TSQL

这很好,但是如果同一个用户连续两次更新它,UpdatedBy 是一个 NOP,TSQL 将(大致):

UPDATE [dbo].[Customers]
SET SomeRandomColumn = @p0 , LastUpdated = @p1 -- note no UpdatedBy
WHERE Id = @p2 AND Version = @p3

在我的例子中,问题是目前所有表上都有一个带括号的审计触发器,它检查审计列是否已更新,如果没有更新,则假定开发人员有错(替换 SUSER_SNAME(),尽管它很容易引发错误)。

我真正希望能够做的是说“始终更新此列,即使它不脏”- 这可能吗?

最佳答案

基于 KristoferA's answer ,我最终得到了一些类似的东西;这是邪恶和脆弱的(反射通常是),但现在可能已经足够了。战斗的另一面是改变触发器的行为:

partial class MyDataContext // or a base-class
{
public override void SubmitChanges(System.Data.Linq.ConflictMode failureMode)
{
this.MakeUpdatesDirty("UpdatedBy", "Updated_By");
base.SubmitChanges(failureMode);
}
}
public static class DataContextExtensions
{
public static void MakeUpdatesDirty(
this DataContext dataContext,
params string[] members)
{
if (dataContext == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("dataContext");
if (members == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("members");
if (members.Length == 0) return; // nothing to do
foreach (object instance in dataContext.GetChangeSet().Updates)
{
MakeDirty(dataContext, instance, members);
}
}
public static void MakeDirty(
this DataContext dataContext, object instance ,
params string[] members)
{
if (dataContext == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("dataContext");
if (instance == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("instance");
if (members == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("members");
if (members.Length == 0) return; // nothing to do
const BindingFlags AllInstance = BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Public;
object commonDataServices = typeof(DataContext)
.GetField("services", AllInstance)
.GetValue(dataContext);
object changeTracker = commonDataServices.GetType()
.GetProperty("ChangeTracker", AllInstance)
.GetValue(commonDataServices, null);
object trackedObject = changeTracker.GetType()
.GetMethod("GetTrackedObject", AllInstance)
.Invoke(changeTracker, new object[] { instance });
var memberCache = trackedObject.GetType()
.GetField("dirtyMemberCache", AllInstance)
.GetValue(trackedObject) as BitArray;

var entityType = instance.GetType();
var metaType = dataContext.Mapping.GetMetaType(entityType);
for(int i = 0 ; i < members.Length ; i++) {
var member = entityType.GetMember(members[i], AllInstance);
if(member != null && member.Length == 1) {
var metaMember = metaType.GetDataMember(member[0]);
if (metaMember != null)
{
memberCache.Set(metaMember.Ordinal, true);
}
}
}
}
}

关于c# - 你能说服 DataContext 将列视为总是脏的吗?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1560513/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com