- c - 在位数组中找到第一个零
- linux - Unix 显示有关匹配两种模式之一的文件的信息
- 正则表达式替换多个文件
- linux - 隐藏来自 xtrace 的命令
我一直在为学校做一个项目(今晚到期!),我有一些严重的内存问题。我是 C 的新手,在分配指针和诸如此类的东西时仍然被抛出一个循环,所以我真的需要一些帮助。
代码如下。文件的顺序是 LinkedLists.h(LinkedList 模块的头文件)、LinkedLists.c(LinkedList 模块)和 TestList.c(主模块)。
/******************************************************************************
* Base struct to contain data structure element information: deterimined by
* the application needs.
******************************************************************************/
#ifndef _LINKED_LISTS_H_
#define _LINKED_LISTS_H_
typedef struct ElementStructs
{
int ElementPosition;
char* ElementValue;
} ElementStructs;
/************** Nothing else in the module needs to be modified *************/
/******************************************************************************
* Base struct of list nodes, contains user information and link pointers.
* The "ElementStructs" typemark must be defined based on specific needs of the
* application.
******************************************************************************/
typedef struct LinkedListNodes
{
/* The user information field */
ElementStructs *ElementPtr;
/* Link pointers */
struct LinkedListNodes *Next;
struct LinkedListNodes *Previous;
} LinkedListNodes;
/******************************************************************************
* Base struct used to manage the linked list data structure.
******************************************************************************/
typedef struct LinkedLists
{
/* Number of elements in the list */
int NumElements;
/* Pointer to the front of the list of elements, possibly NULL */
struct LinkedListNodes *FrontPtr;
/* Pointer to the end of the list of elements, possibly NULL */
struct LinkedListNodes *BackPtr;
} LinkedLists;
/******************************************************************************
* Initialized the linked list data structure
******************************************************************************/
void InitLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr);
/******************************************************************************
* Adds a record to the front of the list.
******************************************************************************/
void AddToFrontOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr, ElementStructs *DataPtr);
/******************************************************************************
* Adds a record to the back of the list.
******************************************************************************/
void AddToBackOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr, ElementStructs *DataPtr);
/******************************************************************************
* Removes (and returns) a record from the front of the list ('works' even on
* an empty list by returning NULL).
******************************************************************************/
ElementStructs *RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr);
/******************************************************************************
* Removes (and returns) a record from the back of the list ('works' even on
* an empty list by returning NULL).
******************************************************************************/
ElementStructs *RemoveFromBackOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr);
/******************************************************************************
* De-allocates the linked list and resets the struct fields as if the
* list was empty.
******************************************************************************/
void DestroyLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr);
#endif /* _LINKED_LISTS_H_ */
链表.c:
/******************************************************************************
* Extracts and prints the first and last 6 elements from the specified data
* set and prints the total number of words in the input file. Utilizes the
* LinkedList module as specified in LinkedLists.h
* Written by xxxxxxx
******************************************************************************/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "LinkedLists.h"
void InitLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr)
{
ListPtr->NumElements = 0;
ListPtr->FrontPtr = NULL;
ListPtr->BackPtr = NULL;
}
void AddToFrontOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr, ElementStructs
*DataPtr)
{
/* If there are no other elements, create new node and add it,
* assigning it to both the front and back pointers */
if(ListPtr->NumElements == 0)
{
ListPtr->FrontPtr = malloc(sizeof(LinkedListNodes));
ListPtr->FrontPtr->ElementPtr = DataPtr;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Next = NULL;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous = NULL;
ListPtr->BackPtr = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
}
/* If there are other elements, create new node and add it to the front
* while retaining previous node order */
else
{
/* Initialize new LinkedListNode */
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous = malloc(sizeof(LinkedListNodes));
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous->ElementPtr = DataPtr;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous->Next = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous->Previous = NULL;
/* Assign newly initialized node as front node of LinkedList */
ListPtr->FrontPtr = ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous;
}
/* List size plus one */
(ListPtr->NumElements)++;
}
void AddToBackOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr, ElementStructs
*DataPtr)
{
/* If there are no other elements, create new node and add it,
* assigning it to both the front and back pointers */
if(ListPtr->NumElements == 0)
{
ListPtr->FrontPtr = malloc(sizeof(LinkedListNodes));
ListPtr->FrontPtr->ElementPtr = DataPtr;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Next = NULL;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous = NULL;
ListPtr->BackPtr = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
/*printf("Adding %s\n", DataPtr->ElementValue);*/
}
/* If there are other elements, create new node and add it to the back
* while retaining previous node order */
else
{
/* Initialize new LinkedListNode */
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next = malloc(sizeof(LinkedListNodes));
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next->ElementPtr = DataPtr;
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next->Previous = ListPtr->BackPtr;
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next->Previous = ListPtr->BackPtr;
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next->Next = NULL;
/* Assign newly initialized node as back node of LinkedList */
ListPtr->BackPtr = ListPtr->BackPtr->Next;
printf("Adding %s\n", ListPtr->BackPtr->ElementPtr->ElementValue);
}
/* List size plus one */
(ListPtr->NumElements)++;
}
ElementStructs *RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr)
{
if(ListPtr->NumElements > 0)
{
ElementStructs *removedElement = ListPtr->FrontPtr->ElementPtr;
LinkedListNodes *removedNode = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
if(ListPtr->NumElements == 1)
{
ListPtr->FrontPtr = NULL;
}
else
{
ListPtr->FrontPtr = ListPtr->FrontPtr->Next;
ListPtr->FrontPtr->Previous = NULL;
}
(ListPtr->NumElements)--;
free(removedNode);
return removedElement;
}
else
{
ElementStructs *nullElement = NULL;
return nullElement;
}
}
ElementStructs *RemoveFromBackOfLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr)
{
if(ListPtr->NumElements > 1)
{
ElementStructs *removedElement = ListPtr->BackPtr->ElementPtr;
LinkedListNodes *removedNode = ListPtr->BackPtr;
if(ListPtr->NumElements == 1)
{
ListPtr->BackPtr = NULL;
}
else
{
ListPtr->BackPtr = ListPtr->BackPtr->Previous;
ListPtr->BackPtr->Next = NULL;
}
(ListPtr->NumElements)--;
free(removedNode);
return removedElement;
}
else
{
ElementStructs *nullElement = NULL;
return nullElement;
}
}
void DestroyLinkedList(LinkedLists *ListPtr)
{
while(ListPtr->FrontPtr != NULL)
{
LinkedListNodes *removedNode = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
ListPtr->FrontPtr = ListPtr->FrontPtr->Next;
/* Deallocate element in node */
free(removedNode->ElementPtr->ElementValue);
free(removedNode->ElementPtr);
/* Deallocate node */
free(removedNode);
}
free(ListPtr);
}
测试列表.c:
/******************************************************************************
* Tests the functionality of the LinkedList specified in LinkedLists.h using
* the file "american-english-words". Reads in individual words and stores them
* as node elements in the LinkedList.
* Written by xxxxx
*****************************************************************************/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "LinkedLists.h"
#define MAX_LENGTH 100 /* Length of longest word in any major English dictionary */
int main(int argc, char** args)
{
if(argc == 2)
{
/* Initialize LinkedList */
LinkedLists *LL;
/* File pointer to input file */
FILE *fp;
/* Node to store input data from file */
ElementStructs *NodeData;
/* Loop completion boolean */
int Done;
/* Loop position counter */
int Position;
/* Iterator */
ElementStructs *CurElement;
/* Open input file and check that it is readable. If not, exit */
fp = fopen(args[1], "r");
if(fp == NULL)
{
fprintf(stderr, "File open failed.");
return 2;
}
/* Initialize linked list and other necessary variables */
LL = malloc(sizeof(*LL));
InitLinkedList(LL);
Done = 0;
Position = 0;
do
{
if(!feof(fp))
{
/* Allocate space for new node data */
NodeData = malloc(sizeof(ElementStructs));
/* Allocate space in node element for input string */
NodeData->ElementValue = malloc(MAX_LENGTH * sizeof(char));
/* Read new node data from file */
fscanf(fp, "%s", NodeData->ElementValue);
/* Assign scanned values to node elements */
NodeData->ElementPosition = Position;
/*strcpy(NodeData->ElementValue, readString);*/
/* Add data node to LinkedList */
AddToFrontOfLinkedList(LL, NodeData);
}
else
Done = 1;
Position++;
}while(Done == 0);
do
{
CurElement = RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList(LL);
if(CurElement != NULL)
printf("Word #%d: %s\n", CurElement->ElementPosition,
CurElement->ElementValue);
}while(CurElement != NULL);
/* Deallocate linked list */
DestroyLinkedList(LL);
fclose(fp);
}
/* Bad command line input */
else
{
fprintf(stderr, "Incorrect number of arguments");
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
程序编译正常。但是,运行它会在执行结束时导致段错误,并且 valgrind 会报告多个内存泄漏(如下所示)。如果您能提供任何帮助,我将不胜感激。问题主要出在 LinkedList.c 模块中的 RemoveFromBackOfLinkedList 和 RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList 方法中。主模块 (TestList.c) 中有一段代码调用其中一个函数(我都试过了,但它们的功能几乎相同,但都不起作用)。该 block 是一个 do/while 循环,如下所示:
do
{
CurElement = RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList(LL);
if(CurElement != NULL)
printf("Word #%d: %s\n", CurElement->ElementPosition,
CurElement->ElementValue);
}while(CurElement != NULL);
Valgrind 结果:
Word #225921: stoich
.
.
.
.
Word #6: Cam's
Word #5: petrochemistry's
Word #4: Tera
Word #3: benedictions
Word #2: wisted
Word #1: toxins
==4849== Invalid write of size 8
==4849== at 0x400B5C: RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849== by 0x40085B: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849== Address 0x10 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==4849==
==4849==
==4849== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==4849== Access not within mapped region at address 0x10
==4849== at 0x400B5C: RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849== by 0x40085B: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==4849== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==4849== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==4849== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==4849== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==4849==
==4849== HEAP SUMMARY:
==4849== in use at exit: 23,965,172 bytes in 413,185 blocks
==4849== total heap usage: 619,775 allocs, 206,590 frees, 28,923,332 bytes allocated
==4849==
==4849== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1 of 9
==4849== at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==4849== by 0x4007E2: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849==
==4849== 200 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5 of 9
==4849== at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==4849== by 0x4007F0: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849==
==4849== 23,963,992 (3,305,392 direct, 20,658,600 indirect) bytes in 206,587 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 9 of 9
==4849== at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==4849== by 0x4007E2: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4849==
==4849== LEAK SUMMARY:
==4849== definitely lost: 3,305,392 bytes in 206,587 blocks
==4849== indirectly lost: 20,658,600 bytes in 206,586 blocks
==4849== possibly lost: 216 bytes in 3 blocks
==4849== still reachable: 964 bytes in 9 blocks
==4849== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==4849== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==4849== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
==4849==
==4849== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==4849== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==4849== ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
最佳答案
==4769== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 4
==4769== at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==4769== by 0x400B46: RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
==4769== by 0x400869: main (in /home/amb2189/hw3/TestList)
这里指的是下面的代码:
LinkedListNodes *removedNode = malloc(sizeof(removedNode));
removedNode = ListPtr->FrontPtr;
您malloc
一 block 内存,然后将其分配给removedNode
,然后立即覆盖指针值。这不会分配给 removedNode
的内容,但会覆盖指针。
正如 Valgrind 所指出的,下一次内存泄漏发生在 main
中:
CurElement = malloc(sizeof(*CurElement));
CurElement
的下一次使用会立即覆盖指针值,这意味着您丢失了对已分配内存的引用:
CurElement = RemoveFromFrontOfLinkedList(LL);
关于c - C 链表中的内存泄漏,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14069536/
前言:笔记是参考B站up主尚硅谷,图片、代码都是哦。在blog写笔记~(图片、代码来源尚硅谷,侵权必删!) 尚硅谷数据结构学习路线B站网站:https://www.bilibili.com/video
这个问题不太可能对任何 future 的访客有帮助;它只与一个较小的地理区域、一个特定的时间点或一个非常狭窄的情况相关,通常不适用于全世界的互联网受众。如需帮助使此问题更广泛适用,visit the
我想创建一个没有全局变量的单个链表。我用 NULL 初始化了第一个元素,然后想将第一个元素 node 复制到 list_。它被复制到函数中,但副作用不起作用。在我的主函数中,该值仍然是NULL。如果我
我正在尝试使链表与此处的链表相似: linked list in C 那就是在另一个结构中有“头”,我首先称它为“头”。但是我发现做那个改变。很难向 list_item 结构添加值。我已经尝试了一些东
我正在尝试理解链表的代码。我明白他们是如何工作的。我正在查看一些与动态内存和链表有关的代码,我在此处对其进行了简化: #include #include typedef struct nod
有人可以解释下面的代码吗?我是 C 的新手,正在努力弄清楚。为什么我们最后有 queueNodeT? typedef char queueElementT; typedef struct queueN
场景如下:- 我想反转单链表的方向,换句话说,反转后所有指针现在应该指向后.. 这个算法应该需要线性时间。 我想到的解决方案是使用另一个数据结构 A Stack.. 借助它可以轻松反转单向链表,所有指
在 python 中使用链表最简单的方法是什么?在 scheme 中,链表由 '(1 2 3 4 5) 定义。 Python 的列表 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 和元组 (1, 2, 3, 4,
本文首发公众号:小码A梦 一般数据主要存储的形式主要有两种,一种是数组,一种是链表。数组是用来存储固定大小的同类型元素,存储在内存中是 一片连续 的空间。而链表就不同于数组。链表
虽然之前有人问过关于链表与数组的问题,但答案大多归结为我们大多数人在某个时候可能已经学到的东西: 列表擅长插入和删除 数组擅长随机访问 现在像 Bjarne Stroustrup 这样受人尊敬的人有
位置 在堆中,碎片化(每个节点的 malloc) - 在几种不同的方式(缓慢分配,缓慢访问,内存碎片)方面效率低下 在堆中,在一个大块中 - 当需要重新分配 时,数据结构获得的所有灵活性都将丢失 在堆
我完成了泛型的学习,但并不容易。不过,我确实明白了。这是我的理解。我希望您纠正我的错误并回答几个问题:)。 public class LinkedList { //class definition }
我将如何创建一个链接列表来在 OCaml 中保存我的数据?我正在尝试制作一个单链表,但是我遇到了语法问题。我只想制作一个模块来简单地从链表中获取'a,插入'a或删除'a。 有人知道吗? 最佳答案 正如
我在使用这段代码时遇到了问题,我不确定我做错了什么 #include #include #include #include typedef struct flight_struct{
我正在创建一个函数来删除给定列表的最后一个节点(作为参数输入)。该函数本身非常简单,如下所示。 function popBack(list) { var current = list.head
我正在尝试开发一种方法,该方法将在链接列表中的当前节点之前插入传递给它的节点。它有3个条件。对于此实现,不能有任何头节点(仅对列表中第一个节点的引用),并且我无法添加更多变量。 如果列表为空,则将传递
使用 scala,我已将大约 100000 个节点添加到链表中。当我使用函数 length 时,例如 mylist.length。我收到“java.lang.StackOverflowError”错误
所以我正在学习处理链表。我将如何递归地添加节点内的项目。我可以通过执行 sum = h.item +h.next.item+h.next.next.item 添加它们,但这只有在我有小的链接列表时才有
所以我一直在努力理解链表的概念(一直在看一些示例代码,我在互联网上找到了这个。现在如果我能请别人确认我是否正确掌握了一些概念。我将绘制图表,说明我认为每个代码链接的作用。 #include #inc
已关闭。这个问题是 not reproducible or was caused by typos 。目前不接受答案。 这个问题是由拼写错误或无法再重现的问题引起的。虽然类似的问题可能是 on-top
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!