- c - 在位数组中找到第一个零
- linux - Unix 显示有关匹配两种模式之一的文件的信息
- 正则表达式替换多个文件
- linux - 隐藏来自 xtrace 的命令
CBMC 在以下行中检测到可能存在无符号加法溢出:
l = (t + *b)&(0xffffffffL);
c += (l < t);
我同意第一行可能会溢出,但我正在处理 CBMC 无法查看的下一行中的进位。如果万一出现溢出,我将进位设置为 1。因此,由于我知道这个和这个,这就是我希望我的代码工作的方式,所以我想继续进行验证过程。那么,我如何告诉 CBMC 忽略这个错误并继续前进呢?
最佳答案
TL;DR 这取决于变量的实际类型。在所有情况下,CBMC 都会检测到可能导致未定义行为的实际错误。这意味着,您应该修复代码而不是禁用 CBMC 中的消息。
完整答案:
一般: 据我所知,CBMC 不允许排除特定属性(另一方面,您可以使用 --property 只检查一个特定属性
标志)。如果您想要官方答案/意见或提出功能请求,我建议您在 CProver Support group 中发帖.
(当然,可以使用 __CPROVER_assume
让 CBMC 排除导致错误的痕迹,但这将是一个非常非常非常糟糕的主意,因为这可能会使其他问题无法解决。)
变体 1: 我假设您的代码看起来像(与此相关:请发布自包含示例并准确解释问题所在,这很难猜测这些事情)
long nondet_long(void);
void main(void) {
long l = 0;
int c = 0;
long t = nondet_long();
long s = nondet_long();
long *b = &s;
l = (t + *b) & (0xffffffffL);
c += (l < t);
}
你正在运行
cbmc --signed-overflow-check test.c
giving an output similar to the following one?
CBMC version 5.1 64-bit x86_64 macos Parsing test.c Converting Type-checking test Generating GOTO Program Adding CPROVER library Function Pointer Removal Partial Inlining Generic Property Instrumentation Starting Bounded Model Checking size of program expression: 41 steps simple slicing removed 3 assignments Generated 2 VCC(s), 2 remaining after simplification Passing problem to propositional reduction converting SSA Running propositional reduction Post-processing Solving with MiniSAT 2.2.0 with simplifier 792 variables, 2302 clauses SAT checker: negated claim is SATISFIABLE, i.e., does not hold Runtime decision procedure: 0.006s Building error trace Counterexample: State 17 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 18 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 19 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000) State 20 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000) State 21 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- t=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 22 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- t=-9223372036854775808 (1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 23 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- s=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 24 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- s=-9223372036854775807 (1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001) State 25 file test.c line 8 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- b=((long int *)NULL) (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) State 26 file test.c line 8 function main thread 0 ---------------------------------------------------- b=&s!0@1 (0000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) Violated property: file test.c line 10 function main arithmetic overflow on signed + in t + *b !overflow("+", signed long int, t, *b) VERIFICATION FAILED
I do not think you should disable this property check, even if you could. The reason for this is, as you say, that this addition can overflow, and, integer overflow is undefined behaviour in C, or, as this answer to the question How to check integer overflow in C? nicely puts it:
[O]nce you've executed x + y, if it overflowed, you're already hosed. It's too late to do any checking - your program could have crashed already. Think of it like checking for division by zero - if you wait until after the division has been executed to check, it's already too late.
See also Integer overflow and undefined behavior and How disastrous is integer overflow in C++?.
Thus, this is an actual bug and CBMC has a good reason for telling you about it. What you actually should do is adapt your code so that there are no potential overflows! The answer mentioned above suggests something like (remember to include limits.h
):
if ((*b > 0 && t > LONG_MAX - *b)
|| (*b < 0 && LONG_MIN < *b && t < LONG_MIN - *b)
|| (*b==LONG_MIN && t < 0))
{
/* Overflow will occur, need to do maths in a more elaborate, but safe way! */
/* ... */
}
else
{
/* No overflow, addition is safe! */
l = (t + *b) & (0xffffffffL);
/* ... */
}
变体 2:在这里,我假设您的代码类似于:
unsigned int nondet_uint(void);
void main(void) {
unsigned int l = 0;
unsigned int c = 0;
unsigned int t = nondet_uint();
unsigned int s = nondet_uint();
unsigned int *b = &s;
l = (t + *b) & (0xffffffffL);
c += (l < t);
}
你在运行
cbmc --unsigned-overflow-check test.c
giving an output similar to the following one?
CBMC version 5.1 64-bit x86_64 macosParsing test.cConvertingType-checking testGenerating GOTO ProgramAdding CPROVER libraryFunction Pointer RemovalPartial InliningGeneric Property InstrumentationStarting Bounded Model Checkingsize of program expression: 42 stepssimple slicing removed 3 assignmentsGenerated 3 VCC(s), 3 remaining after simplificationPassing problem to propositional reductionconverting SSARunning propositional reductionPost-processingSolving with MiniSAT 2.2.0 with simplifier519 variables, 1306 clausesSAT checker: negated claim is SATISFIABLE, i.e., does not holdRuntime decision procedure: 0.01sBuilding error traceCounterexample:State 17 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 18 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 19 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 20 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 21 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- t=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 22 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- t=4187126263 (11111001100100100111100111110111)State 23 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- s=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 24 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- s=3329066504 (11000110011011011000011000001000)State 25 file test.c line 8 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- b=((unsigned int *)NULL) (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)State 26 file test.c line 8 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- b=&s!0@1 (0000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)Violated property: file test.c line 10 function main arithmetic overflow on unsigned + in t + *b !overflow("+", unsigned int, t, *b)VERIFICATION FAILED
Again, this is an actual bug and CBMC has a good reason for telling you about it. This one could be fixed by
l = ((unsigned long)t + (unsigned long)*b) & (0xffffffffL);
c += (l < t);
给出
CBMC version 5.1 64-bit x86_64 macosParsing test.cConvertingType-checking testGenerating GOTO ProgramAdding CPROVER libraryFunction Pointer RemovalPartial InliningGeneric Property InstrumentationStarting Bounded Model Checkingsize of program expression: 42 stepssimple slicing removed 3 assignmentsGenerated 3 VCC(s), 3 remaining after simplificationPassing problem to propositional reductionconverting SSARunning propositional reductionPost-processingSolving with MiniSAT 2.2.0 with simplifier542 variables, 1561 clausesSAT checker inconsistent: negated claim is UNSATISFIABLE, i.e., holdsRuntime decision procedure: 0.002sVERIFICATION SUCCESSFUL
Variant 3: If things are as the previous one, but you have signed int
instead of unsigned int
, things get a bit more complicated. Here, assuming you use (written in a slightly more elaborate way to better see what is going on)
int nondet_int(void);
void main(void) {
int l = 0;
int c = 0;
int t = nondet_int();
int s = nondet_int();
long longt = (long)t;
long longs = (long)s;
long temp1 = longt + longs;
long temp2 = temp1 & (0xffffffffL);
l = temp2;
c += (l < t);
}
然后运行
cbmc --signed-overflow-check test.c
you will get
CBMC version 5.1 64-bit x86_64 macosParsing test.cConvertingType-checking testGenerating GOTO ProgramAdding CPROVER libraryFunction Pointer RemovalPartial InliningGeneric Property InstrumentationStarting Bounded Model Checkingsize of program expression: 48 stepssimple slicing removed 3 assignmentsGenerated 3 VCC(s), 3 remaining after simplificationPassing problem to propositional reductionconverting SSARunning propositional reductionPost-processingSolving with MiniSAT 2.2.0 with simplifier872 variables, 2430 clausesSAT checker: negated claim is SATISFIABLE, i.e., does not holdRuntime decision procedure: 0.008sBuilding error traceCounterexample:State 17 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 18 file test.c line 4 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- l=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 19 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 20 file test.c line 5 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- c=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 21 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- t=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 22 file test.c line 6 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- t=-2147483648 (10000000000000000000000000000000)State 23 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- s=0 (00000000000000000000000000000000)State 24 file test.c line 7 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- s=1 (00000000000000000000000000000001)State 25 file test.c line 9 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- longt=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)State 26 file test.c line 9 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- longt=-2147483648 (1111111111111111111111111111111110000000000000000000000000000000)State 27 file test.c line 10 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- longs=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)State 28 file test.c line 10 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- longs=1 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001)State 29 file test.c line 11 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- temp1=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)State 31 file test.c line 11 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- temp1=-2147483647 (1111111111111111111111111111111110000000000000000000000000000001)State 32 file test.c line 12 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- temp2=0 (0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)State 33 file test.c line 12 function main thread 0---------------------------------------------------- temp2=2147483649 (0000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000001)Violated property: file test.c line 14 function main arithmetic overflow on signed type conversion in (signed int)temp2 temp2 = -2147483648lVERIFICATION FAILED
Or, written more concisely, if you have
t == -2147483648 (0b10000000000000000000000000000000)
s == 1 (0b00000000000000000000000000000001)
然后
temp2 == 2147483649 (0b0000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000001)
尝试将其转换为 signed int
很麻烦,因为它超出了范围(另请参见 Does cast between signed and unsigned int maintain exact bit pattern of variable in memory?)。
如您所见,这个反例也是一个实际的错误,CBMC 再次告诉您这一点是正确的。这特别意味着,您的掩码/数学没有按预期工作(您的掩码将负数变成超出范围的正数)并且您需要修复代码,以便结果在必要的范围内。 (为了确保获得正确的结果,仔细考虑您实际想要做什么可能是值得的。)
关于c - 绕过 CBMC 检测到的无符号加法溢出,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31065205/
#include using namespace std; class C{ private: int value; public: C(){ value = 0;
这个问题已经有答案了: What is the difference between char a[] = ?string?; and char *p = ?string?;? (8 个回答) 已关闭
关闭。此题需要details or clarity 。目前不接受答案。 想要改进这个问题吗?通过 editing this post 添加详细信息并澄清问题. 已关闭 7 年前。 此帖子已于 8 个月
除了调试之外,是否有任何针对 c、c++ 或 c# 的测试工具,其工作原理类似于将独立函数复制粘贴到某个文本框,然后在其他文本框中输入参数? 最佳答案 也许您会考虑单元测试。我推荐你谷歌测试和谷歌模拟
我想在第二台显示器中移动一个窗口 (HWND)。问题是我尝试了很多方法,例如将分辨率加倍或输入负值,但它永远无法将窗口放在我的第二台显示器上。 关于如何在 C/C++/c# 中执行此操作的任何线索 最
我正在寻找 C/C++/C## 中不同类型 DES 的现有实现。我的运行平台是Windows XP/Vista/7。 我正在尝试编写一个 C# 程序,它将使用 DES 算法进行加密和解密。我需要一些实
很难说出这里要问什么。这个问题模棱两可、含糊不清、不完整、过于宽泛或夸夸其谈,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开,visit the help center . 关闭 1
有没有办法强制将另一个 窗口置于顶部? 不是应用程序的窗口,而是另一个已经在系统上运行的窗口。 (Windows, C/C++/C#) 最佳答案 SetWindowPos(that_window_ha
假设您可以在 C/C++ 或 Csharp 之间做出选择,并且您打算在 Windows 和 Linux 服务器上运行同一服务器的多个实例,那么构建套接字服务器应用程序的最明智选择是什么? 最佳答案 如
你们能告诉我它们之间的区别吗? 顺便问一下,有什么叫C++库或C库的吗? 最佳答案 C++ 标准库 和 C 标准库 是 C++ 和 C 标准定义的库,提供给 C++ 和 C 程序使用。那是那些词的共同
下面的测试代码,我将输出信息放在注释中。我使用的是 gcc 4.8.5 和 Centos 7.2。 #include #include class C { public:
很难说出这里问的是什么。这个问题是含糊的、模糊的、不完整的、过于宽泛的或修辞性的,无法以目前的形式得到合理的回答。如需帮助澄清此问题以便重新打开它,visit the help center 。 已关
我的客户将使用名为 annoucement 的结构/类与客户通信。我想我会用 C++ 编写服务器。会有很多不同的类继承annoucement。我的问题是通过网络将这些类发送给客户端 我想也许我应该使用
我在 C# 中有以下函数: public Matrix ConcatDescriptors(IList> descriptors) { int cols = descriptors[0].Co
我有一个项目要编写一个函数来对某些数据执行某些操作。我可以用 C/C++ 编写代码,但我不想与雇主共享该函数的代码。相反,我只想让他有权在他自己的代码中调用该函数。是否可以?我想到了这两种方法 - 在
我使用的是编写糟糕的第 3 方 (C/C++) Api。我从托管代码(C++/CLI)中使用它。有时会出现“访问冲突错误”。这使整个应用程序崩溃。我知道我无法处理这些错误[如果指针访问非法内存位置等,
关闭。这个问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。 我们不允许提问寻求书籍、工具、软件库等的推荐。您可以编辑问题,以便用事实和引用来回答。 关闭 7 年前。
已关闭。此问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines 。目前不接受答案。 要求我们推荐或查找工具、库或最喜欢的场外资源的问题对于 Stack Overflow 来说是偏离主题的,因为
我有一些 C 代码,将使用 P/Invoke 从 C# 调用。我正在尝试为这个 C 函数定义一个 C# 等效项。 SomeData* DoSomething(); struct SomeData {
这个问题已经有答案了: Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? (14 个回答) 已关闭 6
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!