- c - 在位数组中找到第一个零
- linux - Unix 显示有关匹配两种模式之一的文件的信息
- 正则表达式替换多个文件
- linux - 隐藏来自 xtrace 的命令
我的 .NET Core 项目只为 WCF 服务生成异步方法。有什么方法可以像在常规 .NET 项目中那样使用同步方法吗?
在常规的 .NET 中,同时存在同步和异步方法,例如:WcfClient.MethodName
和 WcfClient.MethodNameAsync
在 .NET Core 中只有 WcfClient.MethodNameAsync
这个问题帮助了我: How to call asynchronous method from synchronous method in C#?
但是这个解决方案会导致其他问题。对如何生成同步方法/函数有任何想法吗?
最佳答案
检查 this GitHub issue ;他们讨论了一些您可能感兴趣的事实。
You are right. Our NetCore/Netstandard support does not yet include Sync implementation of the APIs.Please note that this change is on our Roadmap as one of the parity items for the transition to .NetCore and we will update with more specific timelines as soon as it is available.
- erezvani1529 commented on Nov 29, 2016
和
Can you clarify for us what your need is for the synchronous methods? Overall, sync is much less resource efficient than async and is not something that we recommend to our customers. You can always use .GetAwaiter.GetResult() if you need to block on the async calls.
We have had some conversations with the CLR team, who provided this guidance:
If you expose an asynchronous endpoint from your library, avoid exposing a synchronous method that just wraps the asynchronous implementation. Doing so hides from the consumer the true nature of the implementation, and it should be left up to the consumer how they want to consume the implementation. If the consumer chooses to block waiting for the asynchronous implementation to complete, that’s up to the caller, and they can do so with their eyes wide open.This is even more important for the “sync over async” case than it is for the “async over sync” case, because for “sync over async,” it can lead to significant problems with the application, such as hangs.
.NET Core 团队出于上面列出的原因(资源消耗等)选择不支持真正的同步 API。即使我们实现了真正的同步,它最终也会在某种程度上同步而不是异步。出于这个原因,我们认为添加伪造的同步 api 对我们的客户来说是一种障碍,而不是帮助。如果您对此有任何反馈,请告诉我们。pemari-msft 评论 May 11, 2017
和
Let me explain the rationale. True sync is not an option for a library if it is consuming a library that does not support true sync, as is the case for us and .NET Core. (And anyway, true sync is something of a misnomer for APIs that make network calls, but that's a different discussion.) So we have two options: create a sync-over-async wrapper, or let the caller do it. But as we have seen, the official guidance and prevailing wisdom is that exposing a wrapper should be avoided. This is with good reason, and it's similar to avoiding an async API that wraps a synchronous invocation. Avoiding such APIs not only keeps the API surface clean, it also avoids confusion. Customers will think there is true support for sync or async and expose this in their own public interface only to discover later that the underlying implementation doesn't actually support it! So we have concluded that it is best to follow the prevailing wisdom in this case.
You are correct that deadlock avoidance is essential, especially in sync-over-async scenarios, so let me say a little about how this is done. The deadlock issue arises when a thread calls an async method and then blocks waiting for the result, while the async method chain is waiting for the thread to free up so it can continue. The solution is to have the async method do its work in a different context where it won't be constrained by a limited pool of threads. This is done internally in the async method using ConfigureAwait, so deadlocks are avoided within the library itself.
If you feel that true sync is important then you can bring this up at https://github.com/dotnet/corefx to get this supported in .NET Core.
- mirobers commented on May 12, 2017
因此,您可以更改项目以避免 Azure 或假同步调用。
然而,2018年,观点发生了变化:
Well, after enough discussion, following the lead set by HttpWebRequest we have decided to offer sync methods as sync-over-async. This is a time buffer for our users before we deprecate the sync APIs in future versions of the library.
@copernicus365 , to keep it simpler for people, particularly those who are already using the library, our Netstandard2.0 support which includes the feature parity between desktop and Netcore, will leave the methods as-is, in the same namespace / binary of the split-per-service packages(split packages are in preview at the moment). Naturally, we’ll need to echo guidance in our docs by the .NET team about the benefits of converting to async, and try to make as clear as possible that it’s sync-over-async under the covers.
Many thanks to everyone who took the time to chime in on this thread and give us feedback!
One related note - for existing people who are already using the sync methods on .NET Desktop, these will also be moving to sync-over-async. We’re modifying the codebase to use HttpClient everywhere (both in desktop and in .NET Core), which doesn’t offer any sort of true sync. This is to get away from having separate implementations of everything (one with HttpWebRequest and one with HttpClient), which has led to many bugs and behavior differences between the different implementations.
- erezvani1529 commented on Mar 16, 2018
这些更改于 2018 年 5 月登陆 .NET Standard 2.0 目标。
关于c# - .NET Core WCF Connected Services 中是否有同步方法?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46713881/
我有一个 if 语句,如下所示 if (not(fullpath.lower().endswith(".pdf")) or not (fullpath.lower().endswith(tup
然而,在 PHP 中,可以: only appears if $foo is true. only appears if $foo is false. 在 Javascript 中,能否在一个脚
XML有很多好处。它既是机器可读的,也是人类可读的,它具有标准化的格式,并且用途广泛。 它也有一些缺点。它是冗长的,不是传输大量数据的非常有效的方法。 XML最有用的方面之一是模式语言。使用模式,您可
由于长期使用 SQL2000,我并没有真正深入了解公用表表达式。 我给出的答案here (#4025380)和 here (#4018793)违背了潮流,因为他们没有使用 CTE。 我很欣赏它们对于递
我有一个应用程序: void deleteObj(id){ MyObj obj = getObjById(id); if (obj == null) { throw n
我的代码如下。可能我以类似的方式多次使用它,即简单地说,我正在以这种方式管理 session 和事务: List users= null; try{ sess
在开发J2EE Web应用程序时,我通常会按以下方式组织我的包结构 com.jameselsey.. 控制器-控制器/操作转到此处 服务-事务服务类,由控制器调用 域-应用程序使用的我的域类/对象 D
这更多是出于好奇而不是任何重要问题,但我只是想知道 memmove 中的以下片段文档: Copying takes place as if an intermediate buffer were us
路径压缩涉及将根指定为路径上每个节点的新父节点——这可能会降低根的等级,并可能降低路径上所有节点的等级。有办法解决这个问题吗?有必要处理这个吗?或者,也许可以将等级视为树高的上限而不是确切的高度? 谢
我有两个类,A 和 B。A 是 B 的父类,我有一个函数接收指向 A 类型类的指针,检查它是否也是 B 类型,如果是将调用另一个函数,该函数接受一个指向类型 B 的类的指针。当函数调用另一个函数时,我
有没有办法让 valgrind 使用多个处理器? 我正在使用 valgrind 的 callgrind 进行一些瓶颈分析,并注意到我的应用程序中的资源使用行为与在 valgrind/callgrind
假设我们要使用 ReaderT [(a,b)]超过 Maybe monad,然后我们想在列表中进行查找。 现在,一个简单且不常见的方法是: 第一种可能性 find a = ReaderT (looku
我的代码似乎有问题。我需要说的是: if ( $('html').attr('lang').val() == 'fr-FR' ) { // do this } else { // do
根据this文章(2018 年 4 月)AKS 在可用性集中运行时能够跨故障域智能放置 Pod,但尚不考虑更新域。很快就会使用更新域将 Pod 放入 AKS 中吗? 最佳答案 当您设置集群时,它已经自
course | section | type comart2 : bsit201 : lec comart2 :
我正在开发自己的 SDK,而这又依赖于某些第 3 方 SDK。例如 - OkHttp。 我应该将 OkHttp 添加到我的 build.gradle 中,还是让我的 SDK 用户包含它?在这种情况下,
随着 Rust 越来越充实,我对它的兴趣开始激起。我喜欢它支持代数数据类型,尤其是那些匹配的事实,但是对其他功能习语有什么想法吗? 例如标准库中是否有标准过滤器/映射/归约函数的集合,更重要的是,您能
关闭。这个问题不符合Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。 这个问题似乎与 help center 中定义的范围内的编程无关。 . 关闭 9 年前。 Improve
我一直在研究 PHP 中的对象。我见过的所有示例甚至在它们自己的对象上都使用了对象构造函数。 PHP 会强制您这样做吗?如果是,为什么? 例如: firstname = $firstname;
...比关联数组? 关联数组会占用更多内存吗? $arr = array(1, 1, 1); $arr[10] = 1; $arr[] = 1; // <- index is 11; does the
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!