- xml - AJAX/Jquery XML 解析
- 具有多重继承的 XML 模式
- .net - 枚举序列化 Json 与 XML
- XML 简单类型、简单内容、复杂类型、复杂内容
我最近使用 <<- 运算符输出多行字符串,如下所示:
<<-form
<h1>Name to say hi!</h1>
<form method="post">
<input type="text" name="name">
<input type="submit" value="send">
</form>
form
但是我从一些开源代码中窃取了 <<- 运算符,但我没有找到任何关于它的文档。
我有点发现它和 bash 中的工作方式一样:
$ cat <<EOF >> form.html
> <h1>Name to say hi!</h1>
> <form method="post">
> <input type="text" name="name">
> <input type="submit" value="send">
> </form>
> EOF
是这样的吗?我只想找到有关它的文档。
最佳答案
来自 The Ruby Programming Language :
Here Documents
For long string literals, there may be no single character delimiter that can be used without worrying about remembering to escape characters within the literal. Ruby's solution to this problem is to allow you to specify an arbitrary sequence of characters to serve as the delimiter for the string. This kind of literal is borrowed from Unix shell syntax and is historically known as a here document. (Because the document is right here in the source code rather than in an external file.)
Here documents begin with
<<
or<<-
. These are followed immediately (no space is allowed, to prevent ambiguity with the left-shift operator) by an identifier or string that specifies the ending delimiter. The text of the string literal begins on the next line and continues until the text of the delimiter appears on a line by itself. For example:document = <<HERE # This is how we begin a here document
This is a string literal.
It has two lines and abruptly ends...
HEREThe Ruby interpreter gets the contents of a string literal by reading a line at a time from its input. This does not mean, however, that the
<<
must be the last thing on its own line. In fact, after reading the content of a here document, the Ruby interpreter goes back to the line it was on and continues parsing it. The following Ruby code, for example, creates a string by concatenating two here documents and a regular single-quoted string:greeting = <<HERE + <<THERE + "World"
Hello
HERE
There
THEREThe
<<HERE
on line 1 causes the interpreter to read lines 2 and 3. And the<<THERE
causes the interpreter to read lines 4 and 5. After these lines have been read, the three string literals are concatenated into one.The ending delimiter of a here document really must appear on a line by itself: no comment may follow the delimiter. If the here document begins with
<<
, then the delimiter must start at the beginning of the line. If the literal begins with<<-
instead, then the delimiter may have whitespace in front of it. The newline at the beginning of a here document is not part of the literal, but the newline at the end of the document is. Therefore, every here document ends with a line terminator, except for an empty here document, which is the same as""
:empty = <<END
ENDIf you use an unquoted identifier as the terminator, as in the previous examples, then the here document behaves like a double-quoted string for the purposes of interpreting backslash escapes and the
#
character. If you want to be very, very literal, allowing no escape characters whatsoever, place the delimiter in single quotes. Doing this also allows you to use spaces in your delimiter:document = <<'THIS IS THE END, MY ONLY FRIEND, THE END'
.
. lots and lots of text goes here
. with no escaping at all.
.
THIS IS THE END, MY ONLY FRIEND, THE ENDThe single quotes around the delimiter hint that this string literal is like a single-quoted string. In fact, this kind of here document is even stricter. Because the single quote is not a delimiter, there is never a need to escape a single quote with a backslash. And because the backslash is never needed as an escape character, there is never a need to escape the backslash itself. In this kind of here document, therefore, backslashes are simply part of the string literal.
You may also use a double-quoted string literal as the delimiter for a here document. This is the same as using a single identifier, except that it allows spaces within the delimiter:
document = <<-"# # #" # This is the only place we can put a comment
<html><head><title>#{title}</title></head>
<body>
<h1>#{title}</h1>
#{body}
</body>
</html>
# # #Note that there is no way to include a comment within a here document except on the first line after the
<<
token and before the start of the literal. Of all the#
characters in this code, one introduces a comment, three interpolate expressions into the literal, and the rest are the delimiter
关于ruby - Ruby 上的 <<- 运算符,它在哪里记录?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1644132/
以下是一个非常简单的ruby服务器。 require 'socket' local_socket = Socket.new(:INET, :STREAM) local_addr = Socket.
我正在使用 OS X(使用 bash),并且是 unix 的新手。我想知道是否可以修改一些文件以便运行 ruby 程序,我不需要“ruby file.rb”,而是可以运行“ruby.rb”。 有理
我在用 Ruby 替换字符串时遇到一些问题。 我的原文:人之所为不如兽之所为。 我想替换为:==What== human does is not like ==what== animal does.
我想在一个循环中从 Ruby 脚本做这样的事情: 写一个文件a.rb(每次迭代都会改变) 执行系统(ruby 'a.rb') a.rb 将带有结果的字符串写入文件“results” a.rb 完成并且
我的问题是尝试创建一个本地服务器,以便我可以理解由我的新团队开发的应用程序。我的问题是我使用的是 Ruby 2.3.3,而 Gemfile 需要 2.3.1。我无法编辑 Gemfile,因为我被告知很
我有一个使用 GLI 框架用 Ruby 编写的命令行实用程序。我想在我的主目录中配置我的命令行实用程序,使用 Ruby 本身作为 DSL 来处理它(类似于 Gemfile 或 Rakefile)。 我
我的 Rails 应用 Controller 中有这段代码: def delete object = model.datamapper_class.first(:sourced_id =>
我正在寻找的解析器应该: 对 Ruby 解析友好, 规则设计优雅, 产生用户友好的解析错误, 用户文档的数量应该比计算器示例多, UPD:允许在编写语法时省略可选的空格。 快速解析不是一个重要的特性。
我刚开始使用 Ruby,听说有一种“Ruby 方式”编码。除了 Ruby on Rails 之外,还有哪些项目适合学习并被认可且设计良好? 最佳答案 Prawn被明确地创建为不仅是一个该死的好 PDF
我知道之前有人问过类似的问题,但是我该如何构建一个无需在前面输入“ruby”就可以在终端中运行的 Ruby 文件呢? 这里的最终目标是创建一个命令行工具包类型的东西。现在,为了执行我希望用户能够执行的
例如哈希a是{:name=>'mike',:age=>27,:gender=>'male'}哈希 b 是 {:name=>'mike'} 我想知道是否有更好的方法来判断 b 哈希是否在 a 哈希内,而
我是一名决定学习 Ruby 和 Ruby on Rails 的 ASP.NET MVC 开发人员。我已经有所了解并在 RoR 上创建了一个网站。在 ASP.NET MVC 上开发,我一直使用三层架构:
最近我看到 Gary Bernhardt 展示了他用来在 vim 中执行 Ruby 代码的 vim 快捷方式。捷径是 :map ,t :w\|:!ruby %. 似乎这个方法总是执行系统 Rub
在为 this question about Blue Ruby 选择的答案中,查克说: All of the current Ruby implementations are compiled to
我有一个 Ruby 数组 > list = Request.find_all_by_artist("Metallica").map(&:song) => ["Nothing else Matters"
我在四舍五入时遇到问题。我有一个 float ,我想将其四舍五入到小数点后的百分之一。但是,我只能使用 .round ,它基本上将它变成一个 int,意思是 2.34.round # => 2. 有没
我使用 ruby on rails 编写了一个小型 Web 应用程序,它的主要目的是上传、存储和显示来自 xml(文件最多几 MB)文件的结果。运行大约 2 个月后,我注意到 mongrel 进程
我们如何用 Ruby 转换像这样的字符串: 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒 收件人: Latorre 最佳答案 s = "𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒" => "𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒" s.u
通过 ruby monk 时,他们偶尔会从左侧字段中抛出一段语法不熟悉的代码: def compute(xyz) return nil unless xyz xyz.map {|a,
不确定我做错了什么,但我似乎弄错了。 问题是,给你一串空格分隔的数字,你必须返回最大和最小的数字。 注意:所有数字都是有效的 Int32,不需要验证它们。输入字符串中始终至少有一个数字。输出字符串必须
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!