gpt4 book ai didi

c# - 解析性能(If、TryParse、Try-Catch)

转载 作者:IT王子 更新时间:2023-10-29 04:08:55 24 4
gpt4 key购买 nike

我非常了解处理解析文本以获取信息的不同方法。例如,对于解析整数,可以预期什么样的性能。我想知道是否有人知道这方面的任何好的统计数据。我正在寻找测试过这个的人的一些真实数字。

其中哪些在哪些情况下提供最佳性能?

Parse(...)  // Crash if the case is extremely rare .0001%

If (SomethingIsValid) // Check the value before parsing
Parse(...)

TryParse(...) // Using TryParse

try
{
Parse(...)
}
catch
{
// Catch any thrown exceptions
}

最佳答案

总是使用T.TryParse(string str, out T value)。抛出异常代价高昂,如果您可以先验 处理这种情况,则应该避免这种情况。使用 try-catch block 来“节省”性能(因为您的无效数据率很低)是对异常处理的滥用,以牺牲可维护性和良好的编码实践为代价。遵循合理的软件工程开发实践,编写测试用例,运行应用程序,然后进行基准测试和优化。

"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil. Yet we should not pass up our opportunities in that critical 3%" -Donald Knuth

因此,您可以像在碳信用额度中那样任意指定 try-catch 的性能较差,而 TryParse 的性能较好。只有在我们运行我们的应用程序并确定我们有某种减速 w.r.t. 之后。我们甚至会考虑使用 TryParse 以外的任何字符串解析。

(编辑:因为提问者似乎想要计时数据来提供好的建议,这里是请求的计时数据)

来自用户的 10,000 个输入的各种失败率的时间(对于非信徒):

Failure Rate      Try-Catch          TryParse        Slowdown
0% 00:00:00.0131758 00:00:00.0120421 0.1
10% 00:00:00.1540251 00:00:00.0087699 16.6
20% 00:00:00.2833266 00:00:00.0105229 25.9
30% 00:00:00.4462866 00:00:00.0091487 47.8
40% 00:00:00.6951060 00:00:00.0108980 62.8
50% 00:00:00.7567745 00:00:00.0087065 85.9
60% 00:00:00.7090449 00:00:00.0083365 84.1
70% 00:00:00.8179365 00:00:00.0088809 91.1
80% 00:00:00.9468898 00:00:00.0088562 105.9
90% 00:00:01.0411393 00:00:00.0081040 127.5
100% 00:00:01.1488157 00:00:00.0078877 144.6


/// <param name="errorRate">Rate of errors in user input</param>
/// <returns>Total time taken</returns>
public static TimeSpan TimeTryCatch(double errorRate, int seed, int count)
{
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
Random random = new Random(seed);
string bad_prefix = @"X";

stopwatch.Start();
for(int ii = 0; ii < count; ++ii)
{
string input = random.Next().ToString();
if (random.NextDouble() < errorRate)
{
input = bad_prefix + input;
}

int value = 0;
try
{
value = Int32.Parse(input);
}
catch(FormatException)
{
value = -1; // we would do something here with a logger perhaps
}
}
stopwatch.Stop();

return stopwatch.Elapsed;
}

/// <param name="errorRate">Rate of errors in user input</param>
/// <returns>Total time taken</returns>
public static TimeSpan TimeTryParse(double errorRate, int seed, int count)
{
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
Random random = new Random(seed);
string bad_prefix = @"X";

stopwatch.Start();
for(int ii = 0; ii < count; ++ii)
{
string input = random.Next().ToString();
if (random.NextDouble() < errorRate)
{
input = bad_prefix + input;
}

int value = 0;
if (!Int32.TryParse(input, out value))
{
value = -1; // we would do something here with a logger perhaps
}
}
stopwatch.Stop();

return stopwatch.Elapsed;
}

public static void TimeStringParse()
{
double errorRate = 0.1; // 10% of the time our users mess up
int count = 10000; // 10000 entries by a user

TimeSpan trycatch = TimeTryCatch(errorRate, 1, count);
TimeSpan tryparse = TimeTryParse(errorRate, 1, count);

Console.WriteLine("trycatch: {0}", trycatch);
Console.WriteLine("tryparse: {0}", tryparse);
}

关于c# - 解析性能(If、TryParse、Try-Catch),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/150114/

24 4 0
Copyright 2021 - 2024 cfsdn All Rights Reserved 蜀ICP备2022000587号
广告合作:1813099741@qq.com 6ren.com