java - Android如何像在iOS中一样将异步任务分组在一起

Question

我在 iOS 应用中有一个函数，它使用 dispatch_group 对多个休息请求进行分组:

static func fetchCommentsAndTheirReplies(articleId: String, failure: ((NSError)->Void)?, success: (comments: [[String: AnyObject]], replies: [[[String: AnyObject]]], userIds: Set<String>)->Void) {
    var retComments = [[String: AnyObject]]()
    var retReplies = [[[String: AnyObject]]]()
    var retUserIds = Set<String>()

    let queue = dispatch_get_global_queue(QOS_CLASS_USER_INITIATED, 0)
    Alamofire.request(.GET, API.baseUrl + API.article.listCreateComment, parameters: [API.article.articleId: articleId]).responseJSON {
        response in

        dispatch_async(queue) {

            guard let comments = response.result.value as? [[String: AnyObject]] else {
                failure?(Helper.error())
                return
            }
            print(comments)
            retComments = comments

            let group = dispatch_group_create()

            for (commentIndex, comment) in comments.enumerate() {
                guard let id = comment["_id"] as? String else {continue}

                let relevantUserIds = helperParseRelaventUserIdsFromEntity(comment)
                for userId in relevantUserIds {
                    retUserIds.insert(userId)
                }

                retReplies.append([[String: AnyObject]]())

                dispatch_group_enter(group)
                Alamofire.request(.GET, API.baseUrl + API.article.listCreateReply, parameters: [API.article.commentId: id]).responseJSON {
                    response in

                    dispatch_async(queue) {
                        if let replies = response.result.value as? [[String: AnyObject]] {
                            for (_, reply) in replies.enumerate() {

                                let relevantUserIds = helperParseRelaventUserIdsFromEntity(reply)
                                for userId in relevantUserIds {
                                    retUserIds.insert(userId)
                                }
                            }
                            retReplies[commentIndex] = replies
                        }
                        dispatch_group_leave(group)
                    }

                }
            }

            dispatch_group_wait(group, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER)
            success(comments: retComments, replies: retReplies, userIds: retUserIds)

        }

    }
}

从我的代码中可以看出，我获取了同一个article下的所有comments，然后获取每个下对应的replies >评论。在所有请求完成后，我调用我的 success 回调。这可以使用 GCD 的 dispatch_group 来实现。

现在我正在将相同的功能迁移到 android。

public static void fetchCommentsAndTheirReplies(Context context, String articleId, final StringBuffer outErrorMessage, final Runnable failure, final ArrayList<JSONObject> outComments, final ArrayList<ArrayList<JSONObject>> outReplies, final HashSet<String> outUserIds, final Runnable success) {
    final RequestQueue queue = Volley.newRequestQueue(context);
    HashMap<String, String> commentParams = new HashMap<>();
    commentParams.put(API.article.articleId, articleId);
    JsonArrayRequest commentRequest = new JsonArrayRequest(Request.Method.GET, API.baseUrl + API.article.listCreateComment, new JSONObject(commentParams), new Response.Listener<JSONArray>() {
        @Override
        public void onResponse(JSONArray response) {
            try {
                for (int i = 0; i < response.length(); i++) {
                    JSONObject comment = response.getJSONObject(i);
                    outComments.add(comment);

                    outUserIds.addAll(helperParseRelaventUserIdsFromEntity(comment));
                    outReplies.add(new ArrayList<JSONObject>());

                    //TODO: DISPATCH_GROUP?
                    String id = comment.getString("_id");
                    HashMap<String, String> replyParams = new HashMap<>();
                    replyParams.put(API.article.commentId, id);
                    final int finalI = i;
                    JsonArrayRequest replyRequest = new JsonArrayRequest(Request.Method.GET, API.baseUrl + API.article.listCreateReply, new JSONObject(replyParams), new Response.Listener<JSONArray>() {
                        @Override
                        public void onResponse(JSONArray response) {
                            try {
                                for (int j = 0; j < response.length(); j++) {
                                    JSONObject reply = response.getJSONObject(j);
                                    outUserIds.addAll(helperParseRelaventUserIdsFromEntity(reply));
                                    outReplies.get(finalI).add(reply);
                                }
                            } catch (JSONException ex) {}
                        }
                    }, new Response.ErrorListener() {
                        @Override
                        public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {}
                    });
                    queue.add(replyRequest);
                }
                success.run();

            } catch (JSONException ex) {}
        }
    }, new Response.ErrorListener() {
        @Override
        public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
            outErrorMessage.append(error.getMessage());
            failure.run();
        }
    });
    queue.add(commentRequest);
}

请注意，我使用的 success 是在我获得所有 comments 之后和获得所有 replies 之前执行的。

那么我怎样才能对它们进行分组并延迟响应呢？

我正在研究毛茸茸的实现，比如

taskCount++;
if (taskCount == totalCount) {
    success.run();
} 

在回复 block 中，但是看起来很乏味。

Answer 1

您可以简单地使用我为模仿 iOS 行为而制作的此类。调用 enter() 和 leave() 的方式与在 iOS 中使用 dispatch_group_enter 和 dispatch_group_leave 的方式相同，并在要分组的请求之后调用 notify()，就像 dispatch_group_notify 一样。它也像 iOS 使用 block 一样使用 runnable:

public class DispatchGroup {

    private int count = 0;
    private Runnable runnable;

    public DispatchGroup()
    {
        super();
        count = 0;
    }

    public synchronized void enter(){
        count++;
    }

    public synchronized void leave(){
        count--;
        notifyGroup();
    }

    public void notify(Runnable r) {
        runnable = r;
        notifyGroup();
    }

    private void notifyGroup(){
        if (count <=0 && runnable!=null) {
             runnable.run();
        }
    }
}

希望对你有帮助；)