- mongodb - 在 MongoDB mapreduce 中,如何展平值对象?
- javascript - 对象传播与 Object.assign
- html - 输入类型 ="submit"Vs 按钮标签它们可以互换吗?
- sql - 使用 MongoDB 而不是 MS SQL Server 的优缺点
在 C++ 中,成员函数指针可以用来指向派生(甚至是基)类成员吗?
编辑:也许一个例子会有所帮助。假设我们有三个类的层次结构X
、Y
、Z
,按照继承顺序。Y
因此有一个基类 X
和一个派生类 Z
。
现在我们可以为类Y
定义一个成员函数指针p
。这写成:
void (Y::*p)();
(为简单起见,我假设我们只对签名为 void f()
的函数感兴趣)
这个指针p
现在可以用来指向类Y
的成员函数。
那么这个问题(真的是两个问题)是:
p
可以用来指向派生类Z
中的函数吗?p
可以用来指向基类X
中的函数吗?最佳答案
C++03 标准,§4.11 2 Pointer to member conversions :
An rvalue of type “pointer to member of B of type cv T,” where B is a class type, can be converted to an rvalue of type “pointer to member of D of type cv T,” where D is a derived class (clause 10) of B. If B is an inaccessible (clause 11), ambiguous (10.2) or virtual (10.1) base class of D, a program that necessitates this conversion is ill-formed. The result of the conversion refers to the same member as the pointer to member before the conversion took place, but it refers to the base class member as if it were a member of the derived class. The result refers to the member in D’s instance of B. Since the result has type “pointer to member of D of type cv T,” it can be dereferenced with a D object. The result is the same as if the pointer to member of B were dereferenced with the B sub-object of D. The null member pointer value is converted to the null member pointer value of the destination type. 52)
52)The rule for conversion of pointers to members (from pointer to member of base to pointer to member of derived) appears inverted compared to the rule for pointers to objects (from pointer to derived to pointer to base) (4.10, clause 10). This inversion is necessary to ensure type safety. Note that a pointer to member is not a pointer to object or a pointer to function and the rules for conversions of such pointers do not apply to pointers to members. In particular, a pointer to member cannot be converted to a void*.
简而言之,您可以将指向可访问的非虚拟基类的成员的指针转换为指向派生类成员的指针,只要该成员没有歧义。
class A {
public:
void foo();
};
class B : public A {};
class C {
public:
void bar();
};
class D {
public:
void baz();
};
class E : public A, public B, private C, public virtual D {
public:
typedef void (E::*member)();
};
class F:public E {
public:
void bam();
};
...
int main() {
E::member mbr;
mbr = &A::foo; // invalid: ambiguous; E's A or B's A?
mbr = &C::bar; // invalid: C is private
mbr = &D::baz; // invalid: D is virtual
mbr = &F::bam; // invalid: conversion isn't defined by the standard
...
另一个方向的转换(通过 static_cast
)由 § 5.2.9 控制9:
An rvalue of type "pointer to member of D of type cv1 T" can be converted to an rvalue of type "pointer to member of B of type cv2 T", where B is a base class (clause 10 class.derived) of D, if a valid standard conversion from "pointer to member of B of type T" to "pointer to member of D of type T" exists (4.11 conv.mem), and cv2 is the same cv-qualification as, or greater cv-qualification than, cv1.11) The null member pointer value (4.11 conv.mem) is converted to the null member pointer value of the destination type. If class B contains the original member, or is a base or derived class of the class containing the original member, the resulting pointer to member points to the original member. Otherwise, the result of the cast is undefined. [Note: although class B need not contain the original member, the dynamic type of the object on which the pointer to member is dereferenced must contain the original member; see 5.5 expr.mptr.oper.]
11) Function types (including those used in pointer to member function types) are never cv-qualified; see 8.3.5 dcl.fct.
简而言之,您可以从派生的 D::*
转换到基地B::*
如果您可以从 B::*
转换到 D::*
,尽管您只能使用 B::*
在 D 类型或 D 的后代对象上。
关于C++ 继承和成员函数指针,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60000/
我使用的是 PHP 5.3 稳定版,有时会遇到非常不一致的行为。据我所知,在继承中,父类(super class)中的所有属性和方法(私有(private)、公共(public)和 protected
所以我一直在努力寻找正确的方法来让应该非常简单的继承发挥作用(以我想要的方式 ;)),但我失败得很惨。考虑一下: class Parent { public String name = "Pare
给定这些类: class Father { public Father getMe() { return this; } } class Child extends Father {
为什么最后打印“I'm a Child Class”。 ? public class Parent { String parentString; public Parent()
我知道有很多类似的问题对此有很多很好的答案。我试着看看经典的继承方法,或者那些闭包方法等。不知何故,我认为它们对我来说或多或少是“hack”方法,因为它并不是 javascript 设计的真正目的。
我已经使用表单继承有一段时间了,但没有对以下方法进行太多研究。只需创建一个新类而不是表单并从现有表单继承并根据需要将所需控件转换为 protected 。 Visual Studio 2010 设计器
我原以为下面的代码片段会产生编译错误,因为派生类不会有我试图在 pub_fun() 中访问的 priv_var。但是它编译了,我得到了下面提到的输出。有人可以解释这背后的理论吗? class base
继承的替代方案有哪些? 最佳答案 Effective Java:优先考虑组合而不是继承。 (这实际上也来自《四人帮》)。 他提出的情况是,如果扩展类没有明确设计为继承,继承可能会导致许多不恰当的副作用
我有2个类别:动物( parent )和狗(动物的“ child ”),当我创建一个 Animal 对象并尝试提醒该动物的名称时,我得到了 undefined ,而不是她的真名。为什么?(抱歉重复发帖
我试图做继承,但没想到this.array会像静态成员一样。我怎样才能让它成为“ protected /公开的”: function A() { this.array = []; } func
在创建在父类中使用的 lambda 时,我试图访问子类方法和字段。代码更容易解释: class Parent { List> processors; private void do
如果我有一个对象,我想从“ super 对象”“继承”方法以确保一致性。它们将是混合变量。 修订 ParentObj = function() { var self = this; t
class Base { int x=1; void show() { System.out.println(x); } } class Chi
目前我正在尝试几种不同的 Javascript 继承方法。我有以下代码: (“借用”自 http://www.kevlindev.com/tutorials/javascript/inheritanc
我在 .popin-foto 元素中打开一个 popin。当我尝试在同一元素中打开子类 popin 时,它不起作用。 代码 这是 parent function Popin(container, ti
我有以下两个类: class MyClass { friend ostream& operatorvalue +=1; return *this; } 现在
有没有办法完全忽略导入到 html 文件中的 header 中的 CSS 文件? 我希望一个页面拥有自己独立的 CSS,而不是从任何其他 CSS 源继承。 最佳答案 您可以在本地样式表中使用 !imp
Douglas Crockford似乎喜欢下面的继承方式: if (typeof Object.create !== 'function') { Object.create = functio
假设我有以下代码: interface ISomeInterface { void DoSomething(); void A(); void B(); } public
class LinkedList{ public: int data; LinkedList *next; }; class NewLinkedList: public Lin
我是一名优秀的程序员,十分优秀!