c++ - 在位字段中使用枚举是否安全？

Question

说，我有以下结构:

typedef struct my_struct{
    unsigned long       a;
    unsigned long       b;
    char*               c;
    unsigned int        d1  :1;
    unsigned int        d2  :4;
    unsigned int        d3  :4;
    unsigned int        d4  :23;
} my_type, *p_type;

字段 d3当前由 #define 定义从 0x00 到达的直到 0x0D .

其实，d3是一个枚举。所以很想继续替换

    unsigned int        d3  :4;

通过

    my_enum             d3  :4;

这是安全/允许的吗？

代码必须用各种编译

• 编译器(GCC、Visual Studio、嵌入式)
• 平台(Win32、Linux、嵌入式)
• 配置(编译为 C，编译为 C++)

显然，我可以保留 d3 的定义。照原样并在我的代码中使用枚举，将其分配给 d3等等，但这不适用于 C++。

Answer 1

在所有支持标准的 C++ 编译器中都允许。

C++03 标准 9.6/3

A bit-field shall have integral or enumeration type (3.9.1). It isimplementation-defined whether a plain (neither explicitly signed nor unsigned) char, short, int orlong bit-field is signed or unsigned.

C++03 标准 9.6/4

If the value of an enu-merator is stored into a bit-field of the same enumeration type and the number of bits in the bit-field is largeenough to hold all the values of that enumeration type, the original enumerator value and the value of the bit-field shall compare equal.

例子

enum BOOL { f=0, t=1 };

struct A {
    BOOL b:1;
};

void f() {
    A a;
    a.b = t;
    a.b == t // shall yield true
}

但你不能认为枚举具有无符号基础类型。

C++03 标准 7.2/5

The underlying type of an enumeration is an integral type that can represent all the enumerator valuesdefined in the enumeration. It is implementation-defined which integral type is used as the underlying typefor an enumeration except that the underlying type shall not be larger than int unless the value of an enu-merator cannot fit in an int or unsigned int